The ability to perceive geomagnetic fields (GMFs) represents a fascinating biological phenomenon. Studies on transgenic flies have provided evidence that photosensitive Cryptochromes (Cry) are involved in the response to magnetic fields (MFs). However, none of the studies tackled the problem of whether the Cry-dependent magnetosensitivity is coupled to the sole MF presence or to the direction of MF vector. In this study, we used gene silencing and a directional MF to show that mammalian-like Cry2 is necessary for a genuine directional response to periodic rotations of the GMF vector in two insect species. Longer wavelengths of light required higher photon fluxes for a detectable behavioral response, and a sharp detection border was present in the cyan/green spectral region. Both observations are consistent with involvement of the FADox, FAD
•− and FADH
– redox forms of flavin. The response was lost upon covering the eyes, demonstrating that the signal is perceived in the eye region. Immunohistochemical staining detected Cry2 in the hemispherical layer of laminal glia cells underneath the retina. Together, these findings identified the eye-localized Cry2 as an indispensable component and a likely photoreceptor of the directional GMF response. Our study is thus a clear step forward in deciphering the in vivo effects of GMF and supports the interaction of underlying mechanism with the visual system.Behavioral evidence for sensitivity to geomagnetic fields (GMFs) has been found in numerous vertebrate and invertebrate taxa (
1); however, the underlying mechanisms remain a biological and biophysical enigma. In the late 1970s, the effect of light on the orientation of birds inspired Schulten and colleagues (
2) to suggest that reactions of radical pairs (RPs) formed by photosensitive biological processes may be susceptive to external magnetic fields (MFs), and thus provide the basis for in vivo chemical magnetoreception. Since then, ample studies have supported this hypothesis (reviewed, e.g., in refs.
3 and
4).In the past decade, proteins from the Cryptochrome/Photolyase family (CPF) have been widely discussed as being relevant to the light-dependent biological compass relying on the RP mechanism (
5–
7). Plant Crys mediate sensitivity to blue ∕ UVA light (
8), and this sensitivity was reported to be influenced by a MF (
9), although later verification failed (
10). Crys are essential for circadian clock function in mammals, but are likely not directly involved in light reception (
11). In the fruit fly,
Drosophila melanogaster, Cry mediates the light entrainment of the circadian clock (
12). Both fly circadian rhythmicity and geotaxis turned out to be Cry-dependent and were also affected by a MF (
13–
15). Curiously, some insect species have only a
Drosophila-type of Cry (Cry1 or animal type I Cry), whereas others have a mammalian-type of Cry (Cry2 or animal type II Cry) or both (
16).The validity of the RP mechanism was proven in the carotenoid–porphyrin–fullerene triad (
17). In CPF proteins, the change in redox state of their flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) cofactor can result in magnetosensitive RPs (
18). Although the RPs studied in two CPF proteins were magnetosensitive (
19,
20), RP-based GMF effects and anisotropic MF effects have not been shown in CPF proteins. In contrast, ultrafast GMF effects on transient FAD fluorescence in an apparently purified Cry from birds was reported in a recent study (
21), suggesting the existence of a GMF-sensitive reaction that differs from spin-selective RP recombination.The biological output of the RP–GMF interaction might hypothetically be generated when a particular redox status of a FAD cofactor is reached, changing the configuration of the Cry protein (
22) or its C terminus, which switches the Cry to a signaling state (
23). Concerning possible downstream effects, Cry activation was shown to control permeability of potassium channels in
Drosophila (
24).In terms of Cry-mediated in vivo chemical magnetoreception in general, an organism’s sensitivity to the presence of GMF should be considered separate from its sensitivity to the GMF’s orientation (
25). Although the sole detection of the presence or intensity of a GMF can be accomplished in vitro via a disordered RP system (
17), a number of additional critical requirements should be met to function as a sensor of magnetic direction, from the anisotropy of electron–nucleus interactions to the anatomy of a sensory organ (see
Discussion).The most convincing evidence of Cry-dependent magnetosensitivity was provided on
Drosophila (
26,
27). The ability to recognize the presence of a MF relies on functional Cry1, and this magnetoreception in Cry-deficient fruit fly mutants could be rescued using mammalian-like Cry2 (
28). The flies were trained to recognize the local magnetic anomaly up to 10 times stronger than the natural GMF in T-shape maze experiments. Although the choice of one of two arms involved orientation, the actual physiological effect was consistent with nondirectional magnetic sensitivity (
29), as was discussed for plants (
9,
10), fruit fly geotaxis (
14), and the fruit fly circadian clock (
13,
15). Therefore, rather than demonstrating a genuine directional sensor serving as a GMF compass, these studies proved that Cry mediated detection of a rather intense, artificial magnetic anomaly.Here, we have taken advantage of an assay enabling us to test directional magnetic sensitivity in insects at naturally occurring GMF intensities (
30) and functionally confirmed that mammalian-like Cry2 is necessary for sensing the directional component of MFs of natural intensities by two different species of cockroaches.
相似文献