Differential c-Fos expression in cholinergic, monoaminergic, and GABAergic cell groups of the pontomesencephalic tegmentum after paradoxical sleep deprivation and recovery.

Multiple lines of evidence indicate that neurons within the pontomesencephalic tegmentum are critically involved in the generation of paradoxical sleep (PS). From single-unit recording studies, evidence suggests that unidentified but "possibly" cholinergic tegmental neurons discharge at higher rates during PS than during slow wave sleep or even waking and would thus play an active role, whereas "presumed" monoaminergic neurons cease firing during PS and would thus play a permissive role in PS generation. In the present study performed on rats, c-Fos immunostaining was used as a reflection of neuronal activity and combined with immunostaining for choline acetyltransferase (ChAT), serotonin (Ser), tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), or glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) for immunohistochemical identification of active neurons during PS recovery ( approximately 28% of recording time) as compared with PS deprivation (0%) and PS control (approximately 15%) conditions. With PS recovery, there was a significant increase in ChAT+/c-Fos+ cells, a significant decrease in Ser+/c-Fos+ and TH+/c-Fos+ cells, and a significant increase in GAD+/c-Fos+ cells. Across conditions, the percent PS was correlated positively with tegmental cholinergic c-Fos+ cells, negatively with raphe serotonergic and locus coeruleus noradrenergic c-Fos+ cells, and positively with codistributed and neighboring GABAergic c-Fos+ cells. These results support the hypothesis that cholinergic neurons are active, whereas monoaminergic neurons are inactive during PS. They moreover indicate that GABAergic neurons are active during PS and could thus be responsible for inhibiting neighboring monoaminergic neurons that may be essential in the generation of PS.     

Deep lamellar keratoplasty using viscoelastic dissection

We describe a technique for performing deep lamellar keratoplasty using viscoelastic dissection. Deep lamellar dissections of the cornea using viscoelastic substances (sodium hyaluronate) were performed on 4 eyes of 4 patients. One patient with keratoconus and another with corneal scarring underwent lamellar keratoplasty using the technique as the sole procedure for visual rehabilitation. Two patients (2 eyes) with opaque corneas underwent deep lamellar dissection with removal of stromal tissue to allow visualization of the anterior segment structures prior to penetrating keratoplasty, thereby facilitating separation of iridocorneal adhesions as the Descemet membrane was incised. Deep lamellar dissection was performed without complications related to the procedure in all 4 eyes. The 2 lamellar grafts cleared completely, and both eyes achieved excellent visual acuity with spectacle correction. In the other 2 eyes, deep lamellar dissection provided clear visualization of anterior segment structures during incision of the Descemet membrane. Deep lamellar dissection using viscoelastic substances is a useful technique during lamellar keratoplasty.     

Visual performance after photorefractive keratectomy with a 6-mm ablation zone.

PURPOSE: To prospectively examine the effect of photorefractive keratectomy with a 6-mm ablation zone on best-spectacle-corrected visual performance. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted of 164 eyes of 164 patients with an average (+/-SD) of -4.02 +/- 1.74 diopters (range, -0.63 to -8.38 diopters spherical equivalent). Best-spectacle-corrected high-contrast and low-contrast visual acuity (18% Weber contrast) was measured with both natural and dilated pupils. Patients were tested preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months after photorefractive keratectomy. Photorefractive keratectomy was performed with an argon fluoride excimer laser. Fifty-five eyes of 55 patients also underwent astigmatic keratotomy. RESULTS: Twelve months after photorefractive keratectomy, best-spectacle-corrected high-contrast visual acuity with natural pupils showed no significant change from preoperative values; mean (+/-SD) change was 0.004 +/- 0.10 logMAR (t = 0.45, P = .65). Best-spectacle-corrected low-contrast visual acuity with natural pupils was significantly reduced compared to baseline; mean (+/-SD) change was 0.04 +/- 0.13 logMAR (t = 3.3, P = .001). The low-contrast loss was larger (1.5 lines) with dilated pupils; mean (+/-SD) change was 0.13 +/- 0.15 logMAR (t = 9.31, P < .001). Greater losses in dilated low-contrast visual acuity were associated with concurrent astigmatic ketatotomy (t = 2.28, P = .025) and corneal haze of grade 1 or greater (t = 2.71, P = .005). CONCLUSIONS: Reductions in visual performance occur after photorefractive keratectomy with a 6-mm zone. These changes are greatest for low-contrast visual acuity with dilated pupils. Corneal haze and concurrent astigmatic keratotomy are associated with greater losses in low-contrast visual acuity. Best-spectacle-corrected low-contrast visual acuity is a sensitive measure for evaluating visual performance after refractive surgery.     

Is the Degree of Arrhythmia Suppression a Predictor of Survival?

The effectiveness of an antiarrhythmic drug is judged by the degree of ventricular arrhythmia (VA) suppression. We evaluated the relationship between the degree of VA suppression and survival in a dose-adjusted trial of 110 symptomatic patients treated with amiodarone. Cohorts had left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 41 plus minus 18%, ventricular premature contractions (VPCs) of 445 plus minus 571 h, couplets (C) of 733 plus minus 1498 24 h and nonsustained (N) ventricular tachycardia (VT) of 65 plus minus 217 24 h; these conditions were followed for 15 plus minus 11.5 months. Amiodarone was initiated with an oral loading of 670 plus minus 111.7 mg per day for 10 days and continued on maintenance of 274.9 plus minus 102 mg per day. Survival rates of responders and nonresponders with VPCs <70%, 70--89%, greater-than-or-equal90%; C greater-than-or-equal 90%; NVT (100%); and the response to all 3 criteria (suppresion of VPCs greater-than-or-equal70%, C greater-than-or-equal 90% and complete abolition of NVT) were not statistically significant. Survival rates as a function of LVEF <40% (51 patients) or greater-than-or-equal40% (59 patients), as well as responders or nonresponders to all three criteria, were not significant (p = NS). We conclude that, in patients treated with low-dose amiodarone, the degree of VA suppression of PVCs, C and NVT does not predict survival; the survival of patients with LVEF <40% improved irrespective of VA suppression; and criteria for VA suppression should be reassessed at lower levels of suppression for the improvement of the drug risk:benefit ratio. More improvement is not necessarily better.     

Guidelines to productivity bargaining in the health care industry

A potential conflict exists between the recent growth of unionization in the health care industry and management efforts to increase productivity. One method of managing this conflict is to link employee rewards to employee productivity through productivity bargaining.     

Effects of hypnotics on the sleep EEG of healthy young adults: new data and psychopharmacologic implications

Benzodiazepine hypnotics increase NREM sleep and alter its EEG by reducing delta (0.3–3 Hz) and increasing sigma (12–15 Hz) and beta (15–23 Hz) activity. We tested whether the nonbenzodiazepine hypnotic, zolpidem (10 mg), produced the same pattern of sleep and EEG changes as two “classical” benzodiazepines, triazolam (0.25 mg) and temazepam (30 mg). Sleep EEG of 16 subjects was analyzed with period amplitude analysis for 3 nights during drug administration or placebo. The effects of zolpidem were in the same direction but generally of smaller magnitude than those of the classical benzodiazepines. These differences are more likely the result of non-equivalent dosages than different pharmacologic actions. Period amplitude analysis showed that the decreased delta activity resulted mainly from a decrease in wave amplitude. In contrast, the increased sigma and beta activity were produced by increased wave incidence. Delta suppression increased with repeated drug administration but sigma and beta stimulation did not. While these findings have little relevance for the clinical choice of hypnotics they may hold important implications for the brain mechanisms involved in hypnotic tolerance and withdrawal delirium.