Imaging strategies in children with suspected appendicitis

Appendicitis is the commonest acute surgical emergency of childhood, and occurs in approximately 2–4 per 1000 infants. It is usually seen in infants older than 5 years but can occur at any age. Atypical clinical findings are seen in 30–50% of children, especially the younger ones, and often leads to a delayed diagnosis. Preoperative clinical assessment alone has yielded an accuracy ranging between 70 and 90% but is associated with a normal appendectomy rate of 13–25%. Preoperative imaging using the graded compression US technique and/or different helical CT techniques has been able to reduce this rate to 3–7% without an increase in perforation rate. An extensive review of the literature revealed several papers examining the accuracy of different imaging modalities and strategies of acute appendicitis in children. The reported sensitivity of US varied between 87 and 95%, vs 95–97% for helical CT, while the specificity ranged between 85 and 98% for US and 94 and 97% for helical CT. Only one truly randomised study was found, showing that compared with US alone, a combination of US and helical CT increased the sensitivity from 86 to 99%, while the specificity decreased from 95 to 89%. We conclude that imaging should be performed in all children with suspected appendicitis and that US should be the initial procedure with CT as a complementary tool.     

International cancer patterns in men: geographical and temporal variations in cancer risk and the role of gender

The comparison of disease risk in populations stratified by certain demographic variables provides important clues as to the underlying causes of disease. There are fundamental variations in the risk of occurrence of different cancers by gender, area of residence, and time of diagnosis. Men are, for instance, at considerably higher risk of developing most of the common cancers that occur in both sexes, and there are substantial variations in the occurrence of particular cancers in different regions of the World. This paper attempts to highlight some of these remarkable variations using cancer incidence data by sex, area of residence and year of diagnosis, emphasising the strong evidence that many of the contrasts can be appropriated to a number of modifiable “environmental” factors.Rates of cancer occurrence in the developed world are double that of less developed regions, although risk patterns are of very different magnitude and direction depending on the cancer site examined. Lung cancer is the most common neoplasm in men globally, but is overshadowed by prostate cancer in certain westernised countries, notably in the U.S. Cancers of the colon and rectum are important in the developed world, whereas stomach and liver cancer are common in developing areas.Men have systematically higher rates than women for the vast majority of the tumours that develop in both sexes, with the exception of thyroid cancer. There are also huge variations in the extent of the inequality: men have notably elevated risks, relative to women, of developing tumours of the head and neck, bladder, lung, oral cavity and liver.In Europe, incidence trends of lung cancer tend to be declining in men, although there is substantial between-country variation. In women, lung cancer rates are systematically on the increase in most Western, Southern and European countries. Trends in prostate cancer are increasing, as are trends in colorectal cancer (in both sexes), although more noticeably in Southern and Eastern Europe. Stomach cancer continues to fall in most European areas. Bladder cancer is decreasing in both men and women, apart from in Eastern Europe, whereas cancers of the kidney and non-Hodgkin lymphoma are steadily increasing in both sexes.We have estimated that men have better and more readily achievable prospects of avoiding death from cancer since they have lower rates of gender specific cancers, that are probably hormonal in origin, then women. Tobacco consumption plays a dominating role in the excess risk of cancer in men but it is apparent that the male excess disease burden can be effectively reduced by various prevention measures. As well as avoiding (or quitting) smoking, these include, moderating alcohol consumption, avoiding obesity, undertaking regular physical exercise, and maintaining a diet high in fruit and vegetables. The adoption of a healthier lifestyle will be of considerable benefit to the general health of both men and women, with an expectation of a major reduction in the burden of cancer, as well as other major diseases.     

Women's Satisfaction with Their Involvement in Health Care Decisions During a High‐Risk Pregnancy

ABSTRACT: Background: Increasingly, women seek involvement in decisions about their health care. The purpose of this study was to examine women's experience of, and satisfaction with, their involvement in health care decisions during a high‐risk pregnancy. Methods: Forty‐seven women with hypertension or threatened preterm delivery (including multiple births) were interviewed after the birth of their child. They received prenatal care at home from nurses in a community program or were hospitalized. The in‐depth interviews were audiotaped and transcribed; data were analyzed using constant comparative methods. Results: Women identified an increased feeling of responsibility for the health of their baby and themselves, but differed in choosing active or passive involvement in health care decisions. Women who wanted active involvement achieved it through one of three processes: struggling for, negotiating, or being encouraged. Women who wanted passive involvement and women facing health crises used the process of trusting in the expertise of nurses and physicians. Women were satisfied if the care from health care professionals was congruent with how they wanted to be involved in decision‐making. Conclusions: Although most women want to be actively involved in health decision‐making during a high‐risk pregnancy, some prefer a passive role. The setting of prenatal care, community‐based or in‐hospital, was less important than the ability of nurses and physicians to support the woman in her preferred role in decision‐making. (BIRTH 30:2 June 2003)     

Assessing Health Disparities in Rural Hawaii Using the Hoshin Facilitation Method

CONTEXT: Health disparities between rural and urban communities are well documented. There are many suggested causes and many proposed solutions but no one-size-fits-all answer. The most successful community interventions have been introduced by communities themselves. However, before communities invest in such interventions, each group must identify and prioritize their needs. PURPOSE: This article describes the Hoshin facilitation method as a practical option assisting communities in assessing their needs and gaining consensus for future steps. METHODS: Thirty-four meetings were held in 11 rural communities in Hawaii using the Hoshin process to identify factors that impact rural health. Themes were identified by constant comparative analysis and thematic frequency described. Commonality of responses between communities was examined. Informal feedback was collected from meeting participants. FINDINGS: There was a great deal of commonality between community responses, with economic factors, drug use, lack of community leadership, lack of health care services and access to services, lack of healthy activities for youth, and poor public education being the most common issues noted. Group involvement in the meetings was high, and the facilitation method received positive feedback from participants. CONCLUSIONS: The Hoshin facilitation method is a very useful tool to help communities rapidly identify and prioritize areas for programmatic attention.     

Project 2000: perceptions of the philosophy and practice of nursing: shifting perceptions—a new practitioner?

This is the first of two papers which address aspects of the findings of a large scale study commissioned by the English National Board which set out to examine the impact of Project 2000 on perceptions of the philosophy and practice of nursing. The findings presented here suggest that there have been fundamental shifts in perceptions of the nature and discipline of nursing. Students and diplomates of the course perceive themselves as knowledgeable doers, with their practice well grounded in theory and research. They value the interpersonal skills teaching and place the patient firmly at the centre of care delivery, viewing the patient holistically and being prepared to be fierce patient advocates where necessary. It is difficult to determine the extent to which these shifts can be attributed to the Project 2000 course, although the Project 2000 approach to education appears to be an important factor.     

The effect of acidic fibroblast growth factor and live yeast cell derivative on tympanic membrane regeneration in a rat model

The current treatment of choice for chronic tympanic membrane perforations is surgery. Recent studies using various polypeptide growth factors to accelerate closure of tympanic membrane perforations in model systems have produced mixed results. This study evaluates the effect of acidic fibroblast growth factor (AFGF) and live yeast cell derivative (LYCD) on the rate of healing of acute tympanic membrane perforations in a rat model. Thirty-seven rats had both ears separately randomized in a blinded fashion to receive AFGF in one of three concentrations, LYCD, or a control solution. The rats initially underwent subtotal removal of the tympanic membranes bilaterally. Solutions were applied to the randomized ears daily for 3 days, starting at the time of the surgical perforation. The ears were photographed every 3 to 8 days for 35 days. The photographs were digitally scanned and a computer analysis was used to calculate the percentage of residual perforation. No significant difference in the rate of healing was observed for ears treated with AFGF or LYCD versus the controls. Given the potential advantages of medical treatment of tympanic membrane perforations and the established efficacy of growth factors in other model systems, however, further research is warranted. (Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;117:616-21.)     

Gender differences in young adults' beliefs about sunscreen use.

This study employs focus group methodology to explore gender differences in sunscreen use. Guided by the theory of reasoned action, males and females were found to differ on each of the following constructs: behavior, behavioral beliefs, and normative beliefs. Males and females differed in their sunscreen use, with females adopting a more preventive style of sunscreen use and males a more reactive style. Males and females differed in their salient beliefs that motivated their sunscreen use, many of which were related to traditional American gender roles. In addition, although males and females were aware of both positive and negative sources of normative beliefs regarding sunscreen use, females received more encouragement from their mothers and peers than males. Findings are discussed in terms of their implications for the design of future interventions.