全文获取类型
| 收费全文 | 1820739篇 |
| 免费 | 114568篇 |
| 国内免费 | 2279篇 |
专业分类
| 耳鼻咽喉 | 25018篇 |
| 儿科学 | 58912篇 |
| 妇产科学 | 49203篇 |
| 基础医学 | 263847篇 |
| 口腔科学 | 51014篇 |
| 临床医学 | 164886篇 |
| 内科学 | 346048篇 |
| 皮肤病学 | 40569篇 |
| 神经病学 | 143508篇 |
| 特种医学 | 68898篇 |
| 外国民族医学 | 374篇 |
| 外科学 | 264042篇 |
| 综合类 | 36170篇 |
| 现状与发展 | 3篇 |
| 一般理论 | 637篇 |
| 预防医学 | 138430篇 |
| 眼科学 | 41181篇 |
| 药学 | 138078篇 |
| 53篇 | |
| 中国医学 | 3714篇 |
| 肿瘤学 | 103001篇 |
出版年
| 2019年 | 14357篇 |
| 2018年 | 20014篇 |
| 2017年 | 15642篇 |
| 2016年 | 17565篇 |
| 2015年 | 19212篇 |
| 2014年 | 26372篇 |
| 2013年 | 40069篇 |
| 2012年 | 54479篇 |
| 2011年 | 58086篇 |
| 2010年 | 33771篇 |
| 2009年 | 31230篇 |
| 2008年 | 54845篇 |
| 2007年 | 58739篇 |
| 2006年 | 58527篇 |
| 2005年 | 56915篇 |
| 2004年 | 54177篇 |
| 2003年 | 52317篇 |
| 2002年 | 50596篇 |
| 2001年 | 85878篇 |
| 2000年 | 88356篇 |
| 1999年 | 73533篇 |
| 1998年 | 19825篇 |
| 1997年 | 17818篇 |
| 1996年 | 17892篇 |
| 1995年 | 16655篇 |
| 1994年 | 15431篇 |
| 1993年 | 14501篇 |
| 1992年 | 56056篇 |
| 1991年 | 54413篇 |
| 1990年 | 53110篇 |
| 1989年 | 51409篇 |
| 1988年 | 47088篇 |
| 1987年 | 45936篇 |
| 1986年 | 43573篇 |
| 1985年 | 41180篇 |
| 1984年 | 30700篇 |
| 1983年 | 26406篇 |
| 1982年 | 15279篇 |
| 1979年 | 28622篇 |
| 1978年 | 20086篇 |
| 1977年 | 17481篇 |
| 1976年 | 15813篇 |
| 1975年 | 17236篇 |
| 1974年 | 20712篇 |
| 1973年 | 20147篇 |
| 1972年 | 19244篇 |
| 1971年 | 18004篇 |
| 1970年 | 16831篇 |
| 1969年 | 15955篇 |
| 1968年 | 14597篇 |
排序方式： 共有10000条查询结果，搜索用时 15 毫秒
81.
82.
83.
84.
Lisa Daniels Rachael W. Taylor Sheila M. Williams Rosalind S. Gibson Samir Samman Benjamin J. Wheeler Barry J. Taylor Elizabeth A. Fleming Nicola K. Hartley Anne-Louise M. Heath 《Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics》2018,118(6):1006-1016.e1
Background
Little is known about zinc intakes and status during complementary feeding. This is particularly true for baby-led approaches, which encourage infants to feed themselves from the start of complementary feeding, although self-feeding may restrict the intake of zinc-rich foods.Objective
To determine the zinc intakes, sources, and biochemical zinc status of infants following Baby-Led Introduction to SolidS (BLISS), a modified version of Baby-Led Weaning (BLW), compared with traditional spoon-feeding.Design
Secondary analysis of the BLISS randomized controlled trial.Participants/setting
Between 2012 and 2014, 206 community-based participants from Dunedin, New Zealand were randomized to a Control or BLISS group.Intervention
BLISS participants received eight study visits (antenatal to 9 months) providing education and support regarding BLISS (ie, infant self-feeding from 6 months with modifications to address concerns about iron, choking, and growth).Main outcome measures
Dietary zinc intakes at 7 and 12 months (weighed 3-day diet records) and zinc status at 12 months (plasma zinc concentration).Statistical analyses performed
Regression analyses were used to investigate differences in dietary intakes and zinc status by group, adjusted for maternal education and parity and infant age and sex.Results
There were no significant differences in zinc intakes between BLISS and Control infants at 7 (median: 3.5 vs 3.5 mg/day; P=0.42) or 12 (4.4 vs 4.4 mg/day; P=0.86) months. Complementary food groups contributing the most zinc at 7 months were “vegetables” for Control infants, and “breads and cereals” for BLISS infants, then “dairy” for both groups at 12 months. There was no significant difference in mean±standard deviation plasma zinc concentration between the Control (62.8±9.8 μg/dL [9.6±1.5 μmol/L]) and BLISS (62.8±10.5 μg/dL [9.6±1.6 μmol/L]) groups (P=0.75).Conclusions
BLISS infants achieved similar zinc intake and status to Control infants. However, the BLISS intervention was modified to increase iron intake, which may have improved zinc intake, so these results should not be generalized to infants following unmodified BLW. 相似文献85.
Lindsey Haynes-Maslow Lauri Andress Stephanie Jilcott Pitts Isabel Osborne Barbara Baquero Lisa Bailey-Davis Carmen Byker-Shanks Bailey Houghtaling Jane Kolodinsky Brian K. Lo Emily H. Morgan Emily Piltch Elaine Prewitt Rebecca A. Seguin Alice S. Ammerman 《Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics》2018,118(9):1664-1672
Background
In 2016, the US Department of Agriculture (USDA)’s Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Retailer Rule proposed several changes for SNAP-authorized retailers, including: requiring retailers to have at least 85% of their food sales come from items that are not cooked or heated on site before or after purchase; requiring stores to stock seven varieties of qualifying foods from four staple food groups; requiring stores to carry perishable foods in three of the four staple groups; requiring stores to carry six units of qualifying foods at all times (depth of stock); disqualifying multiple ingredient foods and accessory foods from counting toward depth of stock requirements.Objectives
To better understand arguments used to support or oppose the USDA’s proposed rule that all SNAP-authorized retailers carry more nutritious foods.Design
We conducted a qualitative content analysis of a random sample of public comments posted to the US Federal Register (a publicly available database) in response to the USDA’s proposed rule.Participants/setting
A random sample of 20% of all public comments submitted by individuals and organizations to the US Federal Register were analyzed (n=303) for this study.Results
Three main themes were discussed: 1) arguments used in opposition to the rule; 2) arguments used in support of the rule; and 3) facilitators to assist stores in implementing the rule. Some of the subthemes included focusing on definitions used in the rule, reduced food access caused by stores leaving the SNAP program, lack of space and equipment for healthy foods, and the potential for increasing healthy food access.Conclusions
Nutrition and dietetics practitioners may be tasked with working with stores to implement healthy changes. Nutrition and dietetics practitioners must understand the role that the USDA has in food policy. In addition, understanding how federal food policy influences the environments in which dietetics professionals’ clients are making food choices is important. 相似文献86.
87.
88.
Joseph J. Knapik Krista G. Austin Emily K. Farina Harris R. Lieberman 《Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics》2018,118(8):1370-1388
Background
Dietary supplement (DS) use is prevalent among the US Armed Forces personnel, but representative cross-service comparisons and characteristics of personnel using DSs are limited.Objective
Examine DS use and characteristics associated with use in a representative sample of US Armed Forces personnel (Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, and Coast Guard) using data from the 2011 Department of Defense Survey of Health-Related Behaviors.Design and participants
A stratified random sample of service members (SMs) was contacted and asked to complete a questionnaire assessing personal characteristics and DS use.Results
Overall, 69% of the 39,877 SMs reported using DSs ≥1 time per week. The most commonly used DSs were multivitamin or multiminerals (50%), antioxidants (34%), individual vitamins or minerals (33%), bodybuilding supplements (27%), fish oils (26%), herbals (16%), and weight-loss supplements (16%). Multiple logistic regression indicated overall DS use was higher among women, those with higher educational levels, Marine Corps SMs, officers, those with higher body mass index, those engaged in greater physical activity and weight training, and people in weight control programs. DS use was lower when peer groups or leadership discouraged substance abuse.Conclusions
DS use was considerably higher in the US Armed Forces compared with civilian populations, although many demographic and lifestyle factors associated with use were similar. Some categories of DSs extensively used by SMs such as bodybuilding supplements have been associated with adverse events. Discouraging substance abuse through peer groups and leadership actions may reduce use of unnecessary or dangerous DSs. 相似文献89.
90.