Religious orientation, aging, and blood pressure reactivity to interpersonal and cognitive stressors

Background: Research on religion and health suggests general health benefits for those who are more religiously involved. Particular aspects of religiosity that may influence this finding, however, have not been sufficiently investigated.Purpose: This study was designed to explore the relationship between religious orientation (intrinsic, extrinsic) and blood pressure reactivity among older (over 60 years) and younger (18–24 years) adults exposed to two qualitatively different laboratory stressors (cognitive, interpersonal).Methods:Participants were categorized as exhibiting either a predominately intrinsic or extrinsic religious orientation based on scores on the Religious Orientation Scale. They were subsequently exposed (in counterbalanced order) to two laboratory stressors that varied in terms of whether an interpersonal confrontation was involved. Measures of blood pressure were obtained at baseline and during stressor presentation.Results: Analyses indicated that older extrinsically religious individuals demonstrated exaggerated reactivity compared to younger participants and older intrinsically religious individuals. Older intrinsically religious participants did not differ from younger persons. Similar results were found for analysis of baseline data. Extrinsic participants had greater reactivity during the interpersonal confrontation condition than did intrinsic individuals.Conclusions: These findings suggest that religious orientation may be an important variable to study regarding cardiovascular reactivity in, particularly, older adults. This research was supported in part by National Institute on Aging Grant 1 R03 AG 18554-01. A previous version of this article was presented in August 2002 as a Citation Paper at the 110th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Chicago. We thank Timothy W. Smith, James A. Blumenthal, Carl E. Thoresen, and Edward M. Heath for their assistance throughout this project. We also thank Llewellyn Jones and Jodi Hildabrandt for their efforts in collecting data.     

Benefits from peer teaching in the dental gross anatomy laboratory

This study examined the impact of implementing a rotating dissection schedule on the attitudes and performance of first-year dental students in the gross anatomy laboratory at the University of Kentucky. In 2002-2003, half of the students assigned to each cadaver dissected the assigned objectives during the first 90 min of the laboratory session. During the last 30 min, the non-dissecting group members came into the laboratory and had the day's dissection demonstrated and explained to them via peer instruction. Dissection responsibilities rotated with each laboratory session. Eighty-eight percent of student participants were satisfied with the rotating dissection approach according to a mid-term survey, and this satisfaction level remained unchanged at the end of the semester for most students. Students' perceptions of the quality of peer laboratory presentations varied, with only 44% rating them as good or better. Eighty percent of students perceived that rotating dissection did not impede their performance, and this was confirmed by analysis of grade data. Student satisfaction and the ability to devote additional weekly curriculum time to studying anatomy in a very compressed curriculum were the main student-described benefits.     

The Survey of Recent Life Experiences: A decontaminated hassles scale for adults

A new decontaminated hassles measure for adults, the Survey of Recent Life Experiences, was developed and validated. An initial pool of 92 items was administered to 100 subjects along with the Perceived Stress Scale. Fifty-one items were selected, based on significant correlations with the latter scale. The alpha reliability of the resultant final form of the Survey of Recent Life Experiences and its correlation with perceived stress were both high. In a separate cross-replication sample of 136 adults, the alpha reliability of the Survey and its correlation against the Perceived Stress Scale remained acceptably high. Moreover, separate-sex analyses supported the reliability and validity of the Survey of Recent Life Experiences across gender. Factor analysis of the Survey yielded six interpretable factors. Intercorrelations among subscales based on these factors were generally modest, suggesting that the scale is relatively free from contamination by psychological distress.The work reported was facilitated by a grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada's Small Grant Program, administered by the Office of Research Administration, York University. The authors appreciate the cooperation of staff at the Ontario Science Centre, Toronto, and the assistance of Maria Gurevich in verifying the data.     

Time taken to produce dispensing labels in hospital pharmacies,and factors affecting it

The time taken in hospital pharmacies to produce labels for individual patients' medication was measured, and factors affecting the labelling process investigated. Labelling time was measured by direct observation using a stopclock at randomly chosen semi-stratified time periods. Four combinations of major London hospitals and computer systems were studied. The time to produce 2,167 labels was measured and 59 operators were observed. There were significant differences in average labelling time between the studied hospitals/systems (16.6 to 39.3 seconds per label). Operators' experience with their system and the occurrence of interruptions were found to affect labelling significantly (P<0.0001 in both cases). There was an overall trend for labelling time to decrease with increasing experience (P<0.0001), and interruptions added 11 to 12 seconds on average. Operator experience also affected the rate and duration of interruptions, which subsequently affected labelling time. Fewer interruptions occurred with more experienced staff (P=0.0015) and when interrupted, they took less time than inexperienced staff to complete the labelling process. A performance indicator of person-days per 100,000 labels varied from 62.3 to 147.6. Pharmacy managers should be aware that there are significant differences in performance using different labelling systems and that staff training and systems of work may have a marked effect on labelling time.