Use of critical pathways to improve the care of patients with acute myocardial infarction.

PURPOSE: While critical pathways have become a popular strategy to improve the quality of care, their effectiveness is not well defined. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of a critical pathway on processes of care and outcomes for Medicare patients admitted with acute myocardial infarction. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional and longitudinal cohort study was made of Medicare patients aged 65 years and older hospitalized at 32 nonfederal Connecticut hospitals with a principal diagnosis of myocardial infarction during two periods: June 1, 1992, to February 28, 1993, and August 1, 1995, to November 30, 1995. The main endpoints of the cross-sectional analyses for the 1995 cohort were the proportion of patients without contraindications who received evidence-based medical therapies, length of stay, and 30-day mortality. Hospitals with specific critical pathways for patients with myocardial infarction were compared with hospitals without critical pathways. The main endpoints of the longitudinal analyses were change between 1992-93 and 1995 in the proportion of patients receiving evidence-based medical therapies, length of stay, and 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Ten hospitals developed critical pathways between 1992-93 and 1995. Eighteen of 22 nonpathway hospitals employed some combination of standard orders, multidisciplinary teams, or physician champions. Patients admitted to hospitals with critical pathways did not have greater use of aspirin within the first day, during hospitalization, or at discharge; beta-blockers within the first day or at discharge; reperfusion therapy; or use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors at discharge in 1995. The mean (+/- SD) length of stay in 1995 was not significantly different between pathway (7.8 +/- 4.6 days) versus nonpathway hospitals (8.0 +/- 4.2 days), and the change in length of stay between 1992-93 and 1995 was 2.2 days for pathway hospitals and 2.3 days for nonpathway hospitals. Patients admitted to critical pathway hospitals had lower 30-day mortality in 1995 (8.6% versus 11.6% for nonpathway hospitals, P = 0.10) and in 1992-93 (12.6% versus 13.8%, P = 0.39), but the differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitals that instituted critical pathways did not have increased use of proven medical therapies, shorter lengths of stay, or reductions in mortality compared with other hospitals that commonly used alternative approaches to quality improvement among Medicare patients with myocardial infarction.     

A statewide initiative to improve the care of hospitalized pneumonia patients: The Connecticut Pneumonia Pathway Project

PURPOSE: A statewide quality improvement initiative was conducted in Connecticut to improve process-of-care performance and to decrease length of stay for patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia. SETTING AND METHODS: Data were collected on 1,242 elderly (> or =65 years) pneumonia patients hospitalized at 31 of 32 acute care hospitals between January 16, 1995, and March 15, 1996, and on 1,146 patients hospitalized between January 1, 1997, and June 30, 1997. Interventions included feedback of performance data (Qualidigm, the Connecticut Peer Review Organization), dissemination of an evidence-based pneumonia critical pathway (Connecticut Thoracic Society), and sharing of pathway implementation experiences (hospitals). Process and outcome measures included early antibiotic administration, blood culture collection, oxygenation assessment, length of stay, 30-day mortality, and 30-day readmission rates. Analyses were adjusted for severity of illness and hospital-specific practice patterns. RESULTS: After the statewide initiative, improvements were noted in antibiotic administration within 8 hours of hospital arrival (improvement from 83.4% to 88.8%, relative risk [RR] = 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.10 to 1.32), oxygenation assessment within 24 hours of hospital arrival (93.6% to 95.4%; RR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.11 to 1.38), and length of stay (7 days to 5 days, P <0.001). There were no significant changes in blood culture collection within 24 hours of hospital arrival, blood culture collection before antibiotic administration, 30-day mortality, or 30-day readmission rates. CONCLUSIONS: Statewide improvements were demonstrated in the care of hospitalized pneumonia patients concurrent with a multifaceted quality improvement intervention. Further research is needed to separate the effects of the quality improvement interventions from secular trends.     

Promoting physicians' self-assessment and quality improvement: the ABIM diabetes practice improvement module

INTRODUCTION: The American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) recognized that certification and recertification must be based on an assessment of performance in practice as well as an examination of medical knowledge. Physician self-assessment of practice performance is proposed as one method that certification boards may use to evaluate competence in practice-based learning and improvement and systems-based practice. METHODS: Sixteen practicing general internists and endocrinologists with 10-year time-limited certification participated in a beta test of the ABIM's diabetes practice improvement module (PIM) as part of their recertification program. A PIM consists of a self-directed medical record audit, practice system survey, and patient survey. A quality improvement education specialist from the Connecticut Quality Improvement Organization provided on-site and distance consultation on quality improvement methods and tools. An independent audit assessed the reliability of physician self-audit. Qualitative interviews were conducted at 2 time points to assess for physician satisfaction and behavioral change in quality improvement. RESULTS: Fourteen physicians completed the diabetes PIM. All but 1 physician found the medical record audit to provide important information about the practice. Of the 11 physicians who completed a follow-up interview, 10 stated that the quality improvement education specialist helped improve their practice. DISCUSSION: Self-assessment using the ABIM diabetes PIM as part of recertification provides valuable practice information and can lead to meaningful behavioral change by physicians. Collaboration with an educator in quality improvement appears to facilitate the effects of the practice improvement module. Future work should investigate the effect on patient outcomes.