EFFICACY OF RAMIPRIL VERSUS ENALAPRIL IN PATIENTS WITH MILD TO MODERATE ESSENTIAL HYPERTENSION

SUMMARY This double-blind, randomised, cross-over study investigated the antihypertensive efficacy of ramipril and enalapril was completed by 30 patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. After a four-week placebo run-in phase, the patients received either 2.5mg ramipril or 10mg enalapril once daily for four weeks. The dosages were increased to 5mg ramipril and 20mg enalapril for a further four weeks. After a placebo washout phase of four weeks, the patients were crossed over to the alternative treatment. The decrease in average 24-hour ambulatory diastolic blood pressure from week 0 to week 8 was 1.6mmHg greater with ramipril than enalapril (90% confidence interval 0.6-2.7mmHg). The corresponding reduction in for systolic blood pressure was also greater with ramipril than enalapril by 2.4mmHg (90% confidence interval: 0.5-4.2mmHg). For the difference in the drop of 24-hour ambulatory diastolic blood pressure between ramipril and enalapril the lower level of the 90% confidence interval (CI) is above the clinically relevant difference of -3mmHg. This is an indication that ramipril (2.5 and 5mg dose) is at least as effective as enalapril (10 and 20mg dose) in decreasing blood pressure in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. The duration of adequate antihypertensive effect was relatively long for both ramipril and enalapril; however, ramipril tended to have a more prolonged antihypertensive effect. Ramipril had a higher diastolic and systolic trough/peak ratio than enalapril, resulting in a more uniform antihypertensive effect over the 24-hour treatment period. Both ramipril and enalapril were well tolerated and the two treatment groups had similar safety profiles.     

基于7次跨膜受体的药物发现基本方法——细胞检测

随着检测技术进步,含7个跨膜α螺旋结构的受体性质已渐为人们所了解。7次跨膜（7TM）受体不仅具有开关功能,更类似于信息微处理器;特定配体只能参与特定受体介导的部分信号机制,这就为药物发现开拓了一个新领域。为进一步发现7TM受体与配体间的新行为并量化评价药物对这一复杂系统的作用效能,进而指导药物化学研究,药理学检测已成为关注焦点。本文阐述从还原重组体到整体系统测定方法的回归,讨论药物效价与评价其效应的特定检测方法间的联系,强调新的检测方法在药物发现过程中的价值。     

Pancreaticoduodenectomy with vascular reconstruction for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas with borderline resectability

AIM: To analyze whether pancreaticoduodenectomy with simultaneous resection of tumor-involved vessels is a safe approach with acceptable patient survival.METHODS: Between January 2001 and March 2012, 136 patients received pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma at our hospital. Seventy-eight patients diagnosed with pancreatic head carcinoma were included in this study. Among them, 46 patients received standard pancreaticoduodenectomy (group 1) and 32 patients received pancreaticoduodenectomy with simultaneous resection of the portal vein or the superior mesenteric vein or artery (group 2) followed by reconstruction. The immediate surgical outcomes and survivals were compared between the groups. Fifty-five patients with unresectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas without liver metastasis who received only bypass operations (group 3) were selected for additional survival comparison.RESULTS: The median ages of patients were 67 years (range: 37-82 years) in group 1, and 63 years (range: 35-86 years) in group 2. All group 2 patients had resection of the portal vein or the superior mesenteric vein and three patients had resection of the superior mesenteric artery. The pancreatic fistula formation rate was 21.7% (10/46) in group 1 and 15.6% (5/32) in group 2 (P = 0.662). Two hospital deaths (4.3%) occurred in group 1 and one hospital death (3.1%) occurred in group 2 (P = 0.641). The one-year, three-year and five-year overall survival rates in group 1 were 71.1%, 23.6% and 13.5%, respectively. The corresponding rates in group 2 were 70.6%, 33.3% and 22.2% (P = 0.815). The one-year survival rate in group 3 was 13.8%. Pancreaticoduodenectomy with simultaneous vascular resection was safe for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma.CONCLUSION: The short-term and survival outcomes with simultaneous resection were not compromised when compared with that of standard pancreaticoduodenectomy.     

Sleep and waking states in infancy: normative studies

Twelve-hour polygraphic recordings were obtained in 20 normal healthy term infants at 1 week of age, at monthly intervals up to 4 months, and at 6 months of age. Each minute of these recordings was coded into active sleep (AS), quiet sleep (QS), wakefulness (AW), or indeterminate (IN) based on polygraphic and behavioral variables. For each state, a dozen variables were computed with the help of a laboratory computer. Together these variables describe trends in the development of sleep and wakefulness in the laboratory: an increase in QS and a concomitant decrease in AS, an increase in sustained episodes of these states, and continuous sleep onset in AS throughout this time span. Considerable variability appears to characterize immature sleep patterns, but a reduction in variability was noted between 3 and 4 months of age. The number of sustained sleep-state episodes and the percentage of AS and IN proved to be stable characteristics of individual infants. The large variability among and within infants sheds doubt on the usefulness of polygraphic monitoring of sleep states for early detection of abnormalities.     

双能量X线骨质密度测量仪监测小儿下肢骨延长骨矿物质的变化

目的　在儿童骨延长的患儿中 ,为了能够有效地控制骨延长的速率 ,达到骨延长的目的 ,采用双能量X线骨质密度测量仪 (dualenergyX Rayabsorptiometry ,DEXA)监测延长断端骨矿含量 (bonemineralcontent,BMC)的变化。方法　 30例患儿中有 5 0处下肢作了骨延长术 ,平均年龄10 .9岁 (5～ 17岁 ) ,引起短肢的病因不同。术后 7～ 10d开始行骨延长 ,每次延长 0 .2 5mm ,每天 4次。牵引延长期间每周扫描一次 ,拆除外固定器后每 2周扫描一次到术后 2年。DEXA扫描的分辨率是 1mm× 1mm ,扫描速度 30mm/s。比较不同延长时期中骨矿含量的变化。分析不同病因和不同外固定器之间骨矿含量变化的差别。结果　不同固定器之间骨矿含量的差别无著性意义。根据骨延长区BMC增加速率 ,将患儿分为快速组、一般组和慢速组。快速组每日BMC增加速率为 0 .3%～ 0 .6 % ,新骨生长快速 ;一般组每日BMC增加 0 .1%～ 0 .3% ,新骨中速生长 ;慢速组每日增加 <0 .1% ,新骨生成缓慢。骨矿化速率与原发病因相关。结论　DEXA能动态监测骨延长中新生骨的骨矿含量的变化 ,根据骨矿含量变化的程度 ,能够调整骨延长的速率 ,从而达到预期骨延长的目的。