Endovascular stenting of veins and grafts: preliminary clinical experience

Stenotic lesions of veins and bypass grafts are often difficult to dilate and have a high frequency of recurrence. In an effort to provide an endoluminal mechanical support, the new concept of transluminal vascular stenting was applied in four patients with stenoses of nonarterial vessels, including two with postoperative venous stenoses, one with a stenosed mesenteric artery graft anastomosis, and one with a long stenosis of the basilic vein distal to a hemodialysis shunt graft. All four were successfully treated with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty followed by endovascular stenting. All but one of the stented segments were patent, with no significant restenosis after a follow-up of 4 1/2-12 months. There have been previous reports of transluminal vascular stenting in the arterial system, and the preliminary results from this study suggest that endovascular stenting also may play an important role in the treatment of venous and graft stenoses. However, further follow-up and careful patient selection will have to be done to establish the long-term benefit of this new procedure.     

Withholding and withdrawing dialysis: the role of physician specialty and education and patient functional status

Withholding and withdrawing dialysis are subjects of major concern to nephrologists, because both result in a significant number of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patient deaths. The medical literature on withholding dialysis is extremely limited, and that on withdrawing dialysis consists mainly of retrospective studies from the 1980s. The present study was conducted to identify ways to improve dialysis decision making by providing a current understanding of how decisions to withhold or withdraw dialysis are being made and by examining whether some patients who might benefit from dialysis are not being referred. In 1995, 22 of 27 (82%) nephrologists practicing in West Virginia agreed to participate in a year-long prospective study in which they completed forms on each patient from whom they withheld or withdrew dialysis. Seventy-six of a random sample of 214 (36%) primary care physicians returned questionnaires describing their practice experience in 1995 with patients with advanced chronic renal failure. The nephrologists withdrew dialysis from 60 of 822 (7%) patients. Academic nephrologists who had received education in the ethics and law of stopping dialysis withdrew it from a greater percentage of patients than those in private practice (12% v 6%; P = 0.009). Patients who were withdrawn more often resided in nursing homes (37% v 2%; P < 0.0001). Twenty-one patients (37%) lacked decision-making capacity at the time the decision was made to withdraw dialysis. Advance directives were available for 13 of the 21 (62%) patients: eight of the 10 treated by academic nephrologists and five of the 11 treated by private practice nephrologists. Academic nephrologists found advance directives to be helpful in decision making to withdraw dialysis of incapacitated patients more often than nephrologists in private practice (70% v 9%; P = 0.004). Nephrologists withheld dialysis from 25 of 357 (7%) ESRD patients compared with 42 of 193 (22%) withheld by primary care physicians (P < 0.001). In deciding not to refer a patient for a dialysis evaluation, 25% of primary care physicians did not consult a nephrologist; 60% cited age as a reason not to refer. These findings suggest that dialysis decision making might be improved by educating nephrologists about the ethics and law of withdrawing dialysis and about how to implement successfully advance care planning so that advance directives will be present and helpful when decisions need to be made for incapacitated dialysis patients. Education of primary care physicians about when to refer patients with chronic renal failure for a dialysis evaluation might also result in more referrals for patients who will benefit from dialysis.     

Ankylosing spondylarthritis beginning in childhood]

As many as 200 patients underwent comparative clinicoroentgenological and genetic examinations. The patients suffered from ankylosing spondylarthritis and were followed up for a long time. The patients were distributed into 2 groups depending on the age at which the disease commenced. Group I included 40 persons with the juvenile variant of the disease onset (under 16 years), group II comprised 160 subjects who fell ill at an age over 16 years. It has been shown that the patients who fell ill at an age under 16 years are prone to a more acute disease onset with involvement of the peripheral joints, to a slower and not so pronounced damage to the spine whereas the rate and the degree of injury to the iliosacral joints are practically the same in both the groups. On the contrary, adults are characterized by a gradual onset with earlier clinicoroentgenological signs of injury to the axial skeleton, which leads to rapid derangement of the posture in such patients.