Healing spaces: elements of environmental design that make an impact on health

The "ambiance" of a space has an effect on people using the space. In recent years, design for health care environments has begun to include esthetic enhancements in an attempt to reduce stress and anxiety, increase patient satisfaction, and promote health and healing. In this paper, the authors survey the existing research on those elements of the built and natural environment most often asserted by proponents as being inherently healing or promoting health. We postulate a hierarchy of effect of environmental elements ranging from simply nontoxic to safe (both physically and psychologically) to "providing a positive context" to being actively salutogenic. Most relevant research has been concentrated on a limited number of settings and is inadequate to inform the creation of design guidelines for the physical elements of an optimal healing environment. Opportunities exist to make meaningful contributions in this area that are likely to make a significant impact on health outcomes of human beings.     

Patch tests versus use tests in skin irritation risk assessment

In the risk assessment of the ability of a substance or preparation to cause skin irritation, a patch test involving human volunteers is often seen as providing definitive information. However, the skin exposure conditions found in an occluded patch may be far removed from those in a particular use situation, not least for such reasons as the high dose per unit area, the duration of exposure and the maceration of the skin. Whilst these factors may enhance sensitivity in the identification of intrinsic hazard, they may do little to ensure accurate safety evaluation for real use. In this paper, we report data from a series of studies with an unmarketed facial skin cosmetic product. Whilst the product was unexpectedly highly irritating in a standard patch test in 30 volunteers, subsequent use tests, including a 6× daily open application to the elbow for 3 weeks and 2× daily application in a half-face test lasting 3 to 4 weeks and involving 52 volunteers failed to show any evidence of skin irritation. It is concluded that the most meaningful results for skin irritation risk assessment are likely to come from studies which involve relevant patterns of exposure.     

National Partnership for Maternal Safety: Consensus Bundle on Safe Reduction of Primary Cesarean Births— Supporting Intended Vaginal Births

Cesarean births and associated morbidity and mortality have reached near epidemic proportions. The National Partnership for Maternal Safety under the guidance of the Council on Patient Safety in Women's Health Care responded by developing a patient safety bundle to reduce the number of primary cesarean births. Safety bundles outline critical practices to implement in every maternity unit. This National Partnership for Maternity Safety bundle, as with other bundles, is organized into four domains: Readiness, Recognition and Prevention, Response, and Reporting and Systems Learning. Bundle components may be adapted to individual facilities, but standardization within an institution is advised. Evidence‐based resources and recommendations are provided to assist implementation.     

The relationship of carotid intima-media thickness with anthropometric and metabolic parameters in patients with classic congenital adrenal hyperplasia

Background/aimWe aimed to determine the presence of subclinical atherosclerosis using carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) and biochemical parameters in children and adolescents with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH).Materials and methods Thirty-four patients with classic congenital adrenal hyperplasia due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency on regular glucocorticoid treatment for ≥3 years and 31 healthy subjects were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups according to the degree of control of the clinic, laboratory, and radiological parameters as a) “uncontrolled” [n= 22; with increased height velocity (HV) standard deviation score (SDS) (≥2 SDS), advanced bone age, serum 17-OH progesterone <2.0 and ≥10.0 ng/mL or androstenedione <0.3 and ≥ 3.0 ng/mL] or b) “controlled” [n= 12; with HV SDS < 2, bone age (BA)/ chronologic age (CA) ratio < 1.2, serum 17-OH progesterone between 2 and 10 ng/mL and androstenedione between 0.3 and 3.0 ng/mL]. Ultrasonographic examination of carotid artery was performed by the same radiologist using a B-mode ultrasound system.Results There was no significant difference between the CAH and control groups in terms of median (IQR) CIMT values [0.47 (0.05) mm and 0.47 (0.07) mm, respectively; p > 0.05]. When subgroup comparisons were done in terms of median (IQR) CIMT values, there was no significant difference among the controlled, uncontrolled, and healthy control groups [0.45 (0.03) mm, 0.47 (0.04) mm, 0.47 (0.07) mm, respectively; p> 0.05]. In addition, CIMT levels were similar according to sex and disease control status.Conclusion In this study, the CIMT values of CAH cases were similar to those of healthy subjects.     

Risk factors associated with mortality in ıntensive care COVID-19 patients: the importance of chest CT score and intubation timing as risk factors

Background/aim Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a disease with a high rate of progression to critical illness. However, the predictors of mortality in critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) are not yet well understood. In this study, we aimed to investigate the risk factors associated with ICU mortality in our hospital.Materials and methods In this single-centered retrospective study, we enrolled 86 critically ill adult patients with COVID-19 admitted to ICU of Dokuz Eylül UniversityHospital (İzmir, Turkey) between 18 March 2020 and 31 October 2020. Data on demographic information, preexisting comorbidities, treatments, the laboratory findings at ICU admission, and clinical outcomes were collected. The chest computerized tomography (CT) of the patients were evaluated specifically for COVID-19 and CT score was calculated. Data of the survivors and nonsurvivors were compared with survival analysis to identify risk factors of mortality in the ICU.Results The mean age of the patients was 71.1 ± 14.1 years. The patients were predominantly male. The most common comorbidity in patients was hypertension. ICU mortality was 62.8%. Being over 60 years old, CT score > 15, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II score ≥ 15, having dementia, treatment without favipiravir, base excess in blood gas analysis ≤ –2.0, WBC > 10,000/mm³, D-dimer > 1.6 µg/mL, troponin > 24 ng/L, Na ≥ 145 mmol/L were considered to link with ICU mortality according to Kaplan–Meier curves (log-rank test, p < 0.05). The APACHE II score (HR: 1.055, 95% CI: 1.021–1.090) and chest CT score (HR: 2.411, 95% CI:1.193–4.875) were associated with ICU mortality in the cox proportional-hazard regression model adjusted for age, dementia, favipiravir treatment and troponin. Howewer, no difference was found between survivors and nonsurvivors in terms of intubation timing.ConclusionsCOVID-19 patients have a high ICU admission and mortality rate. Studies in the ICU are also crucial in this respect. In our study, we investigated the ICU mortality risk factors of COVID-19 patients. We determined a predictive mortality model consisting of APACHE II score and chest CT score. It was thought that this feasible and practical model would assist in making clinical decisions.     

Clinical characteristics and risk factors for 28-day mortality in critically ill patients with COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study

BackgroundTo date, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused more than 2.6 million deaths all around the world. Risk factors for mortality remain unclear. The primary aim was to determine the independent risk factors for 28-day mortality.Materials and MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, critically ill patients (≥ 18 years) who were admitted to the intensive care unit due to COVID-19 were included. Patient characteristics, laboratory data, radiologic findings, treatments, and complications were analyzed in the study.ResultsA total of 249 patients (median age 71, 69.1% male) were included in the study. 28-day mortality was 67.9% (n = 169). The median age of deceased patients was 75 (66–81). Of them, 68.6% were male. Cerebrovascular disease, dementia, chronic kidney disease, and malignancy were significantly higher in the deceased group. In the multivariate analysis, sepsis/septic shock (OR, 15.16, 95% CI, 3.96–58.11, p < 0.001), acute kidney injury (OR, 4.73, 95% CI, 1.55–14.46,p = 0.006), acute cardiac injury (OR, 9.76, 95% CI, 1.84–51.83, p = 0.007), and chest CT score higher than 15 (OR, 4.49, 95% CI, 1.51-13.38, p = 0.007) were independent risk factors for 28-day mortality.ConclusionEarly detection of the risk factors and the use of chest CT score might improve the outcomes in patients with COVID-19.