Rilmenidine in the hypertensive type-2 diabetic: a controlled pilot study versus captopril

BACKGROUND: Rilmenidine is an innovative antihypertensive agent that binds specifically to I1 imidazoline receptors. The antihypertensive efficacy of rilmenidine in treating type-2 diabetics has been demonstrated, and is associated with very good clinical and laboratory tolerance. DESIGN: This was a 6-month, double-blind, randomized, controlled study comparing the effects of rilmenidine and captopril on the progression of microalbuminuria in a population of patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension [90 mmHg < diastolic blood pressure (DBP) < 110 mmHg], type-2 diabetes, and microalbuminuria (30 mg/24 h < urine albumin excretion < or = 300 mg/24 h). RESULTS: Between month 0 and month 6, the mean supine blood pressure was reduced in a similar manner by rilmenidine (systolic blood pressure from 159 to 141 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure from 98 to 84 mmHg) and captopril (systolic blood pressure from 157 to 144 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure from 101 to 82 mmHg). The median value for microalbuminuria was reduced from 160 (90-260) to 56 (27-87) mg per 24 h by rilmenidine and from 144 (51-200) to 54 (41-123) mg per 24 h by captopril. Rate of clearance of creatinine was not significantly changed during the study by either treatment (with rilmenidine it varied from 95.2 to 95.6 ml/min; with captopril it varied from 86.2 to 90.4 ml/min). There was no statistical difference between the changes in levels of glycosylated hemoglobin for the groups treated with rilmenidine and captopril. Clinical and laboratory acceptabilities were good, and those for the two groups were comparable. CONCLUSION: Rilmenidine exerts similar antihypertensive effects to those of captopril on the hypertensive with type-2 diabetes. Decreases in microalbuminuria elicited by the two treatments do not differ. That administration of rilmenidine decreases microalbuminuria suggests that it could exert nephroprotective effects.     

Wound healing effect of methanolic leaf extract of Napoleona vogelii(Family:Lecythidaceae) in rats

Objective:To investigate the wound healing properly of Napoleona vogelii leaf extract in folkloric medicine.Methods:Roth sexes of adult albino rats(n=25) were used in this study and another group(n=30) were subjected to acute toxicity test(LD_(50)) of the plant extract.For the LD_(50),three randomized groups of 5 rats were first treated with 10,100,1 000 mg/kg body weight(bw),orally.This w as followed by a second treatment of 1500,3000,and 5 000 mg/kg bw of the leaf extract with continual monitoring of the animals for mortality or non-mortality.Incision wounds(1.3cm) were created on the skin of five groups of 5 rals using surgical blade under anesthesia.The first group was topically treated with petroleum jelly alone,group 2 was topically applied 400 mg/mL w/v of the reference drug,Neobaein,while group 3-5 were topically treated with 5-50 mg/mL w/v of the plant extract,respectively.Results:The percentage yield of the extract was 49.80%w/w dry matter.The phytochemical analysis revealed several bioactive constituents including glycosides,tannins,alkaloids,perpenoids.saponins,steroids,proteins,and carbohydrates.The LD_(50) was beyond our experimental limit and was not determined.Increased concentrations(5,20,and 50mg/mL w/v) of the extract had significant(ANOVA,P0.05) healing effect on the incision wounds giving rise to 125%-140% while treatmentawith Neobacin resulted in 150% healing effect on the third treatment regimen compared to the control(100%).Conclusions:These data indicate that Napoleona vogelii leaf extract contains potent bioactive compounds containing wound healing activity,substantiating its use as a wound healer in folkloric medicine.     

Validation of a new standardized cystatin C turbidimetric assay: Evaluation of the three novel CKD-EPI equations in hypertensive patients

Objectives

Analytical and clinical performances of the new standardized cystatin C particle-enhanced turbidimetric immunoassay (PETIA) using DiaSys reagents on Olympus AU2700® analyzer were evaluated.

Design and methods

We have studied imprecision, linearity, limit of detection and limit of quantification of this new immunoassay. Method comparison was assessed in relation to results generated by the standardized Siemens-particle-enhanced nephelometric immunoassay (PENIA). In order to evaluate the clinical relevance of this assay, estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was calculated using MDRD, CKD-EPI creatinine, CKD-EPI cystatin C 2012 and CKD-EPI creatinine–cystatin C 2012 equations and compared to GFR measured using urinary clearance of ^99mTc-DTPA in 100 hypertensive patients.

Results

Cystatin C measurements using DiaSys reagents have reliable analytical performances and are comparable to the standardized Siemens-PENIA method (bias of 0.01 mg/L). The mean measured GFR was 90.0 ± 29.7 mL/min/1.73 m². Bias and accuracy of the three CKD-EPI equations were better than the MDRD. Both CKD-EPI creatinine-based and cystatin C-based formulae had similar bias, precision and accuracy. The combined creatinine–cystatin C equation was significantly more accurate and precise than the CKD-EPI creatinine equation in patients with GFR above 60 mL/min/1.73 m².

Conclusions

The use of cystatin C in a combined equation with creatinine could improve the accuracy of eGFR in the reference interval.