Long-Term Outcome of Laparoscopic Surgery for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Background

As most pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNET) are relatively small and solitary, they may be considered well suited for removal by a minimally invasive approach. There are few large series that describe laparoscopic surgery for PNET. The primary aim of this study was to describe the feasibility, outcome, and histopathology associated with laparoscopic pancreatic surgery (LS) of PNET in a large series.

Methods

All patients with PNET who underwent LS at a single hospital from March 1997 to April 2011 were included retrospectively in the study.

Results

A total of 72 patients with PNET underwent 75 laparoscopic procedures, out of which 65 were laparoscopic resections or enucleations. The median operative time of all patients who underwent resections or enucleations was 175 (60–520) min, the median blood loss was 300 (5–2,700) ml, and the median length of hospital stay was 7 (2–27) days. The overall morbidity rate was 42 %, with a surgical morbidity rate of 21 % and postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) formation in 21 %. Laparoscopic enucleations were associated with a higher rate of POPF than were laparoscopic resections. Five-year disease-specific survival rate was 90 %. The T stage, R stage, and a Ki-67 cutoff value of 5 % significantly predicted 5-year survival.

Conclusion

LS of PNET is feasible with acceptable morbidity and a good overall disease-specific long-term prognosis.     

Impact of Early Parenteral Nutrition on Metabolism and Kidney Injury

A poor nutritional state and a caloric deficit associate with increased morbidity and mortality, but a recent multicenter, randomized controlled trial found that early parenteral nutrition to supplement insufficient enteral nutrition increases morbidity in the intensive care unit, including prolonging the duration of renal replacement therapy, compared with withholding parenteral nutrition for 1 week. Whether early versus late parenteral nutrition impacts the incidence and recovery of AKI is unknown. Here, we report a prespecified analysis from this trial, the Early Parenteral Nutrition Completing Enteral Nutrition in Adult Critically Ill Patients (EPaNIC) study. The timing of parenteral nutrition did not affect the incidence of AKI, but early initiation seemed to slow renal recovery in patients with stage 2 AKI. Early parenteral nutrition did not affect the time course of creatinine and creatinine clearance but did increase plasma urea, urea/creatinine ratio, and nitrogen excretion beginning on the first day of amino acid infusion. In the group that received late parenteral nutrition, infusing amino acids after the first week also increased ureagenesis. During the first 2 weeks, ureagenesis resulted in net waste of 63% of the extra nitrogen intake from early parenteral nutrition. In conclusion, early parenteral nutrition does not seem to impact AKI incidence, although it may delay recovery in patients with stage 2 AKI. Substantial catabolism of the extra amino acids, which leads to higher levels of plasma urea, might explain the prolonged duration of renal replacement therapy observed with early parenteral nutrition.The development of AKI is a frequent and devastating condition in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Short-term mortality is high and increases with worsening AKI stages.¹ In AKI survivors, renal recovery is often incomplete, progression to ESRD may be accelerated, and longer-term mortality rates are increased compared with non-AKI patients.^2,3 Patient management consists of maximal prevention of additional renal damage by hemodynamic stabilization and prevention of (iatrogenic) nephrotoxicity. A curative strategy for established AKI is currently unavailable.⁴Observational studies, finding associations between a poor nutritional state and increased morbidity and mortality of AKI patients⁵ and between accumulation of a caloric deficit and poor renal and survival outcome of ICU patients,^6,7 have led to the hypothesis that feeding could ameliorate kidney injury and improve survival of ICU patients. However, nutrition, especially parenteral nutrition (PN), also has potential complications.^8–11 Because of the lack of adequately designed studies, nutritional guidelines are largely based on expert opinion.^12–14 These opinions invariably recommend the early initiation of enteral feeding but substantially differ in their recommendation on when to start supplemental PN.The Early Parenteral Nutrition Completing Enteral Nutrition in Adult Critically Ill Patients (EPaNIC) study was the first large, multicenter, randomized controlled trial (RCT) addressing this important question. The study showed that early initiation of PN increased dependency on intensive care compared with withholding supplemental PN for 1 week (hereafter labeled early PN and late PN, respectively).¹⁵ Indeed, early PN prolonged the ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS), increased the incidence of new infections, and prolonged the need for mechanical ventilation. Renal harm was suggested by a clear prolongation of the duration of renal replacement therapy (RRT) in ICU and a trend for more AKI (defined as a doubling or more of ICU admission plasma creatinine). However, the number of patients requiring RRT was unaltered, and recovery to premorbid kidney function was not investigated.It was preplanned to study the detailed impact of early versus late PN on the incidence and recovery of AKI and the time course of blood/urine markers of renal function during ICU stay.¹⁶ A priori, we hypothesized that early PN would attenuate kidney injury. However, the original study findings suggested that AKI incidence and renal recovery could be aggravated by increased macronutrient provision in the acute phase of critical illness.