Test-retest reliability in EEG frequency analysis.

This study was performed to gain a better understanding of EEG frequency analysis test-retest reliability in normal healthy adults, and to evaluate factors which could influence the measured inter-record differences. Nineteen subjects underwent serial EEG recordings at 5 min and 12-16 week intervals. Records were visually edited using a standardized protocol, and FFT frequency analysis performed on segments of 60, 40, or 20 sec total length. Correlation coefficients for broad band features averaged 0.92 over the 5 min retest interval and 0.84 over the 12-16 week interval. There was essentially no difference between correlation coefficients of absolute and relative power features. Coefficients based on 60 sec records were marginally higher than those of 40 or 20 sec records. On the other hand, test-retest percent differences were typically lower for relative as opposed to absolute power features, and 60 sec records showed consistently lower percent differences than did 40 or particularly 20 sec records. Peak alpha frequency and mean frequency were the most stable EEG features at either interval. Montage had significant effects on test-retest differences at the 12-16 week interval. A significant association between intra-record and inter-record variability could not be demonstrated.     

The influence of the helmet respirator on peak flow rate in aluminum potroom

The efficiency of the Racal Airstream helmet respirator in improving peak expiratory flow rates (PEFR) and symptoms (dyspnea, wheezing, and cough) in aluminum potroom workers with respiratory complaints was assessed in 19 workers. Peak expiratory flow readings and symptom recording from a 2-week working period with use of the respirator were compared with a period when the 3M 9906 disposable mask was used. The study was designed as a randomized, parallel, cross-over study with five or six daily measurements of PEFR and daily symptom recording. A significant number of workers (15) had a higher mean peak flow in the helmet period than in the nonhelmet period (p less than 0.01); symptoms did not improve significantly in the helmet period. Objective evidence of respiratory protection was observed for the group of workers as a whole, but the effect on symptoms as well as individual effect on peak flow was minor in the majority of the workers.     

Nutrition labels in bar graph format deemed most useful for consumer purchase decisions using adaptive conjoint analysis

This study estimated the effects of changing multiple levels and combinations of nutrition information format, load, expression, and order on consumers' perceptions of label usefulness in purchase decisions using adaptive conjoint analysis. A shopping mall intercept survey, which was administered by a marketing research firm, assessed consumer preferences for 12 label alternatives produced on Campbell's soup cans to portray nutrition information realistically; 252 of 258 respondents completed the computer interactive interview. Consumers significantly preferred the bar graph format to the bar graph/nutrient density and traditional label formats. Consumers considered the bar graph/nutrient density format to be as useful as the traditional label format. There was a highly significant difference among the three levels of information load; the most information load was preferred regardless of nutrient importance. Consumers significantly preferred nutrition information stated in absolute numbers and percentages vs in absolute numbers only in traditional, or in percentages only expressions. There was a significant difference between consumer preferences for the two types of information order. The findings indicate that consumers clearly preferred the nutrition label that displayed all nutrient values using a bar graph format, offered the most information load, and expressed nutrient values using both absolute numbers and percentages. Consumers also preferred nutrition information rearranged in an order that grouped nutrients that should be consumed in adequate amounts on the top, calories in the middle, and nutrients that should be consumed in lesser amounts on the bottom of the label.