At least six forms of extremely homologous cytochromes P-450 in rat liver are encoded at two closely linked genetic loci.

A subpopulation of phenobarbital-induced cytochrome P-450 in rat liver has been shown to consist of four closely related forms of the enzyme that appeared to be strain-related. In the present study, polypeptides composing this family were analyzed by two-dimensional electrophoresis of hepatic microsomes from 64 individual phenobarbital-treated rats. The animals surveyed included both sexes from four inbred and five outbred strains/colonies and F1 progenies from 10 crosses. Two new members of this polypeptide family were identified on the basis of their unique electrophoretic behavior and peptide maps. Eight phenotypes were observed that consisted of two to four member polypeptides. The six closely related cytochromes P-450 were found to be encoded at two genetic loci with at least four alleles at the P-450b locus and at least two alleles at the P-450e locus. Most colonies of outbred strains were characterized by polymorphism at one or both of these loci, and in no case did they contain unique alleles. Analyses of parents and their F1 progenies indicated that the P-450b and P-450e loci are closely linked on the same autosome and are expressed codominantly. Furthermore, the products of these loci appear to be coordinately regulated. The extreme homology between P-450b and P-450e genes, their high degree of polymorphism, and their close linkage suggest that they are subject to the same genetic mechanisms that maintain these features in other multigene families.     

The Future of Polycystic Kidney Disease Research—As Seen By the 12 Kaplan Awardees

Polycystic kidney disease (PKD) is one of the most common life-threatening genetic diseases. Jared J. Grantham, M.D., has done more than any other individual to promote PKD research around the world. However, despite decades of investigation there is still no approved therapy for PKD in the United States. In May 2014, the University of Kansas Medical Center hosted a symposium in Kansas City honoring the occasion of Dr. Grantham''s retirement and invited all the awardees of the Lillian Jean Kaplan International Prize for Advancement in the Understanding of Polycystic Kidney Disease to participate in a forward-thinking and interactive forum focused on future directions and innovations in PKD research. This article summarizes the contributions of the 12 Kaplan awardees and their vision for the future of PKD research.     

Mutation of POC1B in a Severe Syndromic Retinal Ciliopathy

We describe a consanguineous Iraqi family with Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA), Joubert syndrome (JBTS), and polycystic kidney disease (PKD). Targeted next‐generation sequencing for excluding mutations in known LCA and JBTS genes, homozygosity mapping, and whole‐exome sequencing identified a homozygous missense variant, c.317G>C (p.Arg106Pro), in POC1B, a gene essential for ciliogenesis, basal body, and centrosome integrity. In silico modeling suggested a requirement of p.Arg106 for the formation of the third WD40 repeat and a protein interaction interface. In human and mouse retina, POC1B localized to the basal body and centriole adjacent to the connecting cilium of photoreceptors and in synapses of the outer plexiform layer. Knockdown of Poc1b in zebrafish caused cystic kidneys and retinal degeneration with shortened and reduced photoreceptor connecting cilia, compatible with the human syndromic ciliopathy. A recent study describes homozygosity for p.Arg106Pro_POC1B in a family with nonsyndromic cone‐rod dystrophy. The phenotype associated with homozygous p.Arg106Pro_POC1B may thus be highly variable, analogous to homozygous p.Leu710Ser in WDR19 causing either isolated retinitis pigmentosa or Jeune syndrome. Our study indicates that POC1B is required for retinal integrity, and we propose POC1B mutations as a probable cause for JBTS with severe PKD.     

Molecular architecture of the αβ T cell receptor–CD3 complex

αβ T-cell receptor (TCR) activation plays a crucial role for T-cell function. However, the TCR itself does not possess signaling domains. Instead, the TCR is noncovalently coupled to a conserved multisubunit signaling apparatus, the CD3 complex, that comprises the CD3εγ, CD3εδ, and CD3ζζ dimers. How antigen ligation by the TCR triggers CD3 activation and what structural role the CD3 extracellular domains (ECDs) play in the assembled TCR–CD3 complex remain unclear. Here, we use two complementary structural approaches to gain insight into the overall organization of the TCR–CD3 complex. Small-angle X-ray scattering of the soluble TCR–CD3εδ complex reveals the CD3εδ ECDs to sit underneath the TCR α-chain. The observed arrangement is consistent with EM images of the entire TCR–CD3 integral membrane complex, in which the CD3εδ and CD3εγ subunits were situated underneath the TCR α-chain and TCR β-chain, respectively. Interestingly, the TCR–CD3 transmembrane complex bound to peptide–MHC is a dimer in which two TCRs project outward from a central core composed of the CD3 ECDs and the TCR and CD3 transmembrane domains. This arrangement suggests a potential ligand-dependent dimerization mechanism for TCR signaling. Collectively, our data advance our understanding of the molecular organization of the TCR–CD3 complex, and provides a conceptual framework for the TCR activation mechanism.T cells are key mediators of the adaptive immune response. Each αβ T cell contains a unique αβ T-cell receptor (TCR), which binds antigens (Ags) displayed by major histocompatibility complexes (MHCs) and MHC-like molecules (1). The TCR serves as a remarkably sensitive driver of cellular function: although TCR ligands typically bind quite weakly (1–200 μM), even a handful of TCR ligands are sufficient to fully activate a T cell (2, 3). The TCR does not possess intracellular signaling domains, uncoupling Ag recognition from T-cell signaling. The TCR is instead noncovalently associated with a multisubunit signaling apparatus, consisting of the CD3εγ and CD3εδ heterodimers and the CD3ζζ homodimer, which collectively form the TCR–CD3 complex (4, 5). The CD3γ/δ/ε subunits each consist of a single extracellular Ig domain and a single immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif (ITAM), whereas CD3ζ has a short extracellular domain (ECD) and three ITAMs (6–11). The TCR–CD3 complex exists in 1:1:1:1 stoichiometry for the αβTCR:CD3εγ:CD3εδ:CD3ζζ dimers (12). Phosphorylation of the intracellular CD3 ITAMs and recruitment of the adaptor Nck lead to T-cell activation, proliferation, and survival (13, 14). Understanding the underlying principles of TCR–CD3 architecture and T-cell signaling is of therapeutic interest. For example, TCR–CD3 is the target of therapeutic antibodies such as the immunosuppressant OKT3 (15), and there is increasing interest in manipulating T cells in an Ag-dependent manner by using naturally occurring and engineered TCRs (16).Assembly of the TCR–CD3 complex is primarily driven by each protein’s transmembrane (TM) region, enforced through the interaction of evolutionarily conserved, charged, residues in each TM region (4, 5, 12). What, if any, role interactions between TCR and CD3 ECDs play in the assembly and function of the complex remains controversial (5): there are several plausible proposed models of activation, which are not necessarily mutually exclusive (5, 17–19). Although structures of TCR–peptide–MHC (pMHC) complexes (2), TCR–MHC-I–like complexes (1), and the CD3 dimers (6–10) have been separately determined, how the αβ TCR associates with the CD3 complex is largely unknown. Here, we use two independent structural approaches to gain an understanding of the TCR–CD3 complex organization and structure.     

The Ser/Thr protein kinase AfsK regulates polar growth and hyphal branching in the filamentous bacteria Streptomyces

In cells that exhibit apical growth, mechanisms that regulate cell polarity are crucial for determination of cellular shape and for the adaptation of growth to intrinsic and extrinsic cues. Broadly conserved pathways control cell polarity in eukaryotes, but less is known about polarly growing prokaryotes. An evolutionarily ancient form of apical growth is found in the filamentous bacteria Streptomyces, and is directed by a polarisome-like complex involving the essential protein DivIVA. We report here that this bacterial polarization machinery is regulated by a eukaryotic-type Ser/Thr protein kinase, AfsK, which localizes to hyphal tips and phosphorylates DivIVA. During normal growth, AfsK regulates hyphal branching by modulating branch-site selection and some aspect of the underlying polarisome-splitting mechanism that controls branching of Streptomyces hyphae. Further, AfsK is activated by signals generated by the arrest of cell wall synthesis and directly communicates this to the polarisome by hyperphosphorylating DivIVA. Induction of high levels of DivIVA phosphorylation by using a constitutively active mutant AfsK causes disassembly of apical polarisomes, followed by establishment of multiple hyphal branches elsewhere in the cell, revealing a profound impact of this kinase on growth polarity. The function of AfsK is reminiscent of the phoshorylation of polarity proteins and polarisome components by Ser/Thr protein kinases in eukaryotes.