Evaluating surgical competency with the American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination, skill testing, and intraoperative assessment

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of surgical competency should include assessment of knowledge, technical skill, and judgment. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between the American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE), skill testing, and intraoperative assessment. METHODS: Postgraduate year 2 (PGY-2) and postgraduate year 3 (PGY-3) surgery residents (n = 33) were tested by means of (1) the ABSITE, (2) skill testing on a laparoscopic video-trainer, and (3) intra-operative global assessments during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The Pearson correlation was used to determine the correlation between the ABSITE, skill testing, and intraoperative assessments. For the comparison of PGY-2 and PGY-3 resident performance, Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used. RESULTS: The ABSITE scores did not correlate with skill testing or intraoperative assessments (not significant). Skill testing correlated with the intraoperative composite score and with 4 of 8 operative performance criteria (P<.05). The ABSITE scores and skill testing were not different for PGY-2 and PGY-3 residents (not significant). Intraoperative assessments were better in 5 of 8 criteria and the composite score for PGY-3 versus PGY-2 residents (P<.05), which demonstrated construct validity. CONCLUSIONS: The ABSITE measures knowledge but does not correlate with technical skill or operative performance. Residency programs should use multiple assessment instruments to evaluate competency. There may be a role for both skill testing and intraoperative assessment in the evaluation of surgical competency.     

Cyclodextrins: Their Future in Drug Formulation and Delivery

Pharmaceutical Research - Since their discovery, cyclodextrins and their ability to form inclusion complexes have fascinated chemists, formulators and recently, entrepreneurs. This mini-review has...     

Prospective technical validation and assessment of intra-tumour heterogeneity of a low density array hypoxia gene profile in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Background and purposeTumour hypoxia is associated with a poor prognosis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), however there is no accepted method for assessing hypoxia clinically. We aimed to conduct a technical validation of a hypoxia gene expression signature using the TaqMan Low Density Array (TLDA) platform to investigate if this approach reliably identified hypoxic tumours.Materials and methodsTumour samples (n = 201) from 80 HNSCC patients were collected prospectively from two centres. Fifty-three patients received pimonidazole prior to surgery. TaqMan Low Density Array-Hypoxia Scores (TLDA-HS) were obtained by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) using a 25-gene signature and customised TLDA cards. Assay performance was assessed as coefficient of variation (CoV).ResultsThe assay was sensitive with linear reaction efficiencies across a 4log₁₀ range of inputted cDNA (0.001–10 ng/μl). Intra- (CoV = 6.9%) and inter- (CoV = 2.0%) assay reproducibility were excellent. Intra-tumour heterogeneity was lower for TLDA-HS (23.2%) than for pimonidazole (67.2%) or single gene measurements of CA9 (62.2%), VEGFA (45.0%) or HIG2 (39.4%). TLDA-HS in HNSCC cell lines increased with decreasing pO₂. TLDA-HS correlated with Affymetrix U133 Plus 2.0 microarray HS (p < 0.01) and positive pimonidazole scores (p = 0.005).ConclusionsGene expression measurements of hypoxia using a 25-gene signature and TLDA cards are sensitive, reproducible and associated with lower intra-tumour heterogeneity than assaying individual genes or pimonidazole binding. The approach is suitable for further assessment of prognostic and predictive capability in clinical trial material.     

Pain in birds: a review for veterinary nurses

Pain assessment and management in animals is still a new and growing field of research. Although it is still early days for pain research in birds, this article aims to provide information on the pain behaviours known so far, and describes current analgesic drugs and doses.