Are patients being transferred to level-I trauma centers for reasons other than medical necessity?

BACKGROUND: In the United States, the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act defines broad guidelines regarding interhospital transfer of patients who have sought care in the emergency department. However, patient transfers for nonmedical reasons are still considered a common practice. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the possible risk factors for hospital transfer in a population of patients unlikely to require transfer to a level-I center for medical reasons. METHODS: A retrospective case-control national database study was performed with use of data from the National Trauma Data Bank (version 4.3). The study group consisted of patients with low Injury Severity Scores (< or =9) who were transferred to a level-I trauma center from another hospital. The controls were patients with low Injury Severity Scores who were treated at any hospital that was lower than a level-I trauma center and were not transferred. Hypothesized risk factors for hospital transfer were the age, gender, race, and insurance status of the patient; the time of day the transfer was received; and the number and type of comorbidities. RESULTS: The total sample included 97,393 patients, 21% of whom were transferred to a level-I trauma center. The odds ratios adjusted for all risk factors indicated that transfer rates were higher for male patients compared with female patients (adjusted odds ratio = 1.46), children compared with seniors (3.54), blacks compared with whites (1.28), evening or night transfers compared with morning or afternoon transfers (2.25), patients with Medicaid compared with those with other types of insurance (2.02), and for those with one or more comorbidities compared with those with no comorbidity (2.79). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest the need for prospective studies to further investigate the relationships between hospital transfer and medical and nonmedical factors.     

Decreased protein levels of key insulin signalling molecules in adipose tissue from young men with a low birthweight – potential link to increased risk of diabetes?

Aims/hypothesis

Individuals with low birthweight are at increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms are unknown. Previously we have shown that low birthweight is associated with changes in muscle insulin signalling proteins. Here we determined whether low birthweight is associated with changes in insulin signalling proteins in adipose tissue.

Methods

Men (age 23 years) with either a low (bottom 10th percentile) (n?=?17) or a normal (50th–90th percentile) (n?=?17) birthweight were recruited from the Danish Medical Birth Registry and subcutaneous adipose biopsies were taken.

Results

Between the two groups there was no difference in protein level of the insulin receptor, protein kinase C zeta, glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK3) alpha, GSK3 beta, protein kinase B alpha and beta, peroxisome proliferative activated receptor gamma coactivator 1 or Src-homology-2-containing protein. However, the levels of GLUT4 (also known as solute carrier family 2 [facilitated glucose transporter], member 4 [SLC2A4]) (52?±?10.9% reduction, p?p?p?=?0.06) and IRS1 (59?±?24% reduction, p?Conclusions/interpretation These findings show that low birthweight is associated with reduced levels of adipose insulin signalling proteins, thus providing a potential molecular framework to explain why people with low birthweight are at increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes. These differences precede the development of diabetes and thus may help predict disease risk.