Although it is known that diverse bacterial flagellar motors produce different torques, the mechanism underlying torque variation is unknown. To understand this difference better, we combined genetic analyses with electron cryo-tomography subtomogram averaging to determine in situ structures of flagellar motors that produce different torques, from
Campylobacter and
Vibrio species. For the first time, to our knowledge, our results unambiguously locate the torque-generating stator complexes and show that diverse high-torque motors use variants of an ancestrally related family of structures to scaffold incorporation of additional stator complexes at wider radii from the axial driveshaft than in the model enteric motor. We identify the protein components of these additional scaffold structures and elucidate their sequential assembly, demonstrating that they are required for stator-complex incorporation. These proteins are widespread, suggesting that different bacteria have tailored torques to specific environments by scaffolding alternative stator placement and number. Our results quantitatively account for different motor torques, complete the assignment of the locations of the major flagellar components, and provide crucial constraints for understanding mechanisms of torque generation and the evolution of multiprotein complexes.Flagellated bacteria have tailored their motility to diverse habitats. For example, the enteric model organisms
Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and
Escherichia coli colonize animal digestive tracts and can reside outside a host, assembling flagella over their cell body to swim. However, a diverse spectrum of flagellar swimming ability is seen across the bacterial kingdom.
Caulobacter crescentus inhabits low-nutrient freshwater environments where it swims using a high-efficiency flagellar motor (
1,
2), whereas
Vibrio species produce high-speed, sodium-driven polar flagella to capitalize on the high sodium gradient of their marine habitat (
3). On the other hand, the ε-proteobacteria and spirochetes, many of which thrive exclusively in association with a host, have evolved characteristically rapid and powerful swimming capabilities that enable them to bore through mucous layers coating epithelial cells or between tissues. Indeed, the ε-proteobacteria
Campylobacter jejuni and
Helicobacter pylori are capable of continued swimming in high-viscosity media that immobilize
E.
coli or
Vibrio cells (
4–
6), and similar behavior is observed for spirochetes (
7,
8).Despite differences in the organisms’ swimming ability, the flagellar motor is composed of a conserved core of ∼20 structural proteins (
9). The mechanism of flagellar motility is conserved (
10), with torque generated by rotor and stator components (
9). Stator complexes, heterooligomers of four motility A (MotA) and two motility B (MotB) proteins, are thought to form a ring that surrounds the axial driveshaft. Transmembrane helices of MotA and MotB form an ion channel, and MotB features a large periplasmic domain that binds peptidoglycan (
11,
12) and the flagellar structural component, the P-ring (
13). The stator complex couples ion flux to exertion of force on the cytoplasmic rotor ring (the C-ring), which transmits torque to the axial driveshaft (the rod), universal joint (the hook), and helical propeller (the filament), culminating in propulsion of the bacterium. Biophysical (
14) and freeze-fracture (
15) studies together with modeling (
16) have proposed that a tight ring of ∼11 stator complexes dynamically assembles around the rod above the outer lobe of the C-ring in closely related
Salmonella and
E.
coli motors (which we collectively refer to as the “enteric motor”). However, despite these conclusions, and although the structures observed in subtomogram averages have been proposed to be the stator complexes (
17–
19), the locations and stoichiometries of the stator complexes remain to be confirmed.How can we explain the wide diversity in flagellar swimming abilities in the context of a conserved core flagellar motor? Biophysical studies suggest that the source of the difference lies, at least in part, in variations in the mechanical output of the motors themselves. Torques of motors from different bacteria have been shown to range over an order of magnitude, and torque correlates with swimming speed and the ability of bacteria to propel themselves through different viscosities, indicating that adaptations are likely to be at the level of the motor itself. [Torque also varies within a single species, up to a maximum value, as a function of the number of stator complexes incorporated into the motor (
14)]. For example,
C.
crescentus motors have been measured to produce torques of 350 pN⋅nm (
2). Estimates for the torque of the enteric motor ranges from
∼1,300 to ∼2,000 pN⋅nm (
20,
21). The ε-proteobacterium
H.
pylori has been estimated to swim with torque of 3,600 pN⋅nm (
22), and spirochetes are capable of swimming with 4,000 pN⋅nm of torque (
21,
23). Sodium-driven motor torques in
Vibrio spp. have been measured between ∼2,000 and 4,000 pN⋅nm (
24), depending on the magnitude of the sodium gradient. It is noteworthy, however, that an estimated sodium motive force in
Vibrio spp. that is lower than the standard
E.
coli proton motive force nevertheless drives the
Vibrio motor with higher torque than the
E.
coli motor (
24,
25), further suggesting that torque differences likely exist at the level of the motor. However, the molecular mechanism by which different motors might produce different torques has not been investigated.The simplest scenario for tuning motor torque would be evolved adaptation of motor architecture. In support of this scenario, we recently showed that many motors have evolved additional structures not found in the well-studied enteric motors (
18), and we observed that the C-ring radius varies among species (
17,
18). One of the most widespread novel structures is a periplasmic basal disk directly beneath the outer membrane, often co-occurring with varied uncharacterized additional structures, which we collectively term “disk complexes.” Consistently, disk complexes have been seen only in motors that produce torque higher than that in
E.
coli or
Salmonella. For example, the sodium-driven ∼2,000+ pN⋅nm torque motors of
Vibrio species assemble a disk complex featuring a basal disk beneath the outer membrane (
18) in addition to smaller H- and T-rings composed of FlgOT (flagella O, T) and MotXY (motility X, Y), respectively (
26,
27). It has been shown that the T-ring interacts with stator complexes in
Vibrio spp. (
28), although the exact location and number of stator complexes in
Vibrio spp. remains unclear. ε-Proteobacteria such as
Helicobacter species,
C.
jejuni, and
Wolinella succinogenes also assemble disk complexes composed of large basal disks beneath the outer membrane together with additional smaller disks (
18,
29). Although these and other cases of additional disks have been reported (
18,
30), their relation to flagellar function remains enigmatic, and it is unclear if these widespread disk complexes are homologous or analogous.In this study, we hypothesized that bacteria have tuned their swimming abilities by evolving structural adaptations to their flagellar motors that would result in altered torque generation. Using electron cryo-tomography and subtomogram averaging, we found that
Vibrio polar γ-proteobacterial and
Campylobacter ε-proteobacterial flagellar motors incorporate 13 and 17 stator complexes, respectively, compared with the ∼11 in enteric bacteria. In both cases, these stator complexes are scaffolded into wider stator rings relative to the enteric motor by components of their respective disk complexes. The wider
C.
jejuni stator ring is further reflected in a considerably wider rotor C-ring. Further analysis of the components of the
Vibrio and
C.
jejuni disk complexes reveals that they share a core protein, FlgP, but each has acquired diverse additional components to form divergent disk-complex architectures. We conclude by showing that our structural data of wider stator rings featuring additional stator complexes can quantitatively account for the differences in torque between different flagellar motors.
相似文献