A comparison of histological and immunohistochemical methods for quantifying the pathological lesions of Pick's disease

Counts of Pick bodies (PB), Pick cells (PC), senile plaques (SP) and neurofibrillary tangles (NFT) were made in the frontal and temporal cortex from patients with Pick's disease (PD). Lesions were stained histologically with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) and the Bielschowsky silver impregnation method and labeled immunohistochemically with antibodies raised to ubiquitin and tau. The greatest numbers of PB were revealed by immunohistochemistry. Counts of PB revealed by ubiquitin and tau were highly positively correlated which suggested that the two antibodies recognized virtually identical populations of PB. The greatest numbers of PC were revealed by HE followed by the anti-ubiquitin antibody. However, the correlation between counts was poor, suggesting that HE and ubiquitin revealed different populations of PC. The greatest numbers of SP and NFT were revealed by the Bielschowsky method indicating the presence of Alzheimer-type lesions not revealed by the immunohistochemistry. In addition, more NFT were revealed by the anti-ubiquitin compared with the anti-tau antibody. The data suggested that in PD: (i) the anti-ubiquitin and anti-tau antibodies were equally effective at labeling PB; (ii) both HE and anti-ubiquitin should be used to quantitate PC; and (iii) the Bielschowsky method should be used to quantitate SP and NFT.     

差示—线性组合导数光谱法测定扑咳灵片中扑尔敏和溴化丙胺太林

本文提出了差示一线性组合导数光谱法用于测定混合组分体系的基本原理和实验方法。并试用本法消除了扑尔敏、溴化丙胺太林、灵芝粉及附加剂之间的相互干扰,从而分别测定了扑咳灵片巾扑尔敏和溴化丙胺太林的含量,其平均回收率分别为100.2±1.49％(CV)和99.89±1.03％(CV)。其精密度、准确度均好。     

Clinical differences between first and recurrent episodes in depressive patients

Background

Depressive disorder is one of the most common mental disorders in primary care. Depression is often a chronic disorder with recurrent episodes. Little is known about the differences in clinical profile between first and recurrent episodes. The aim of the study is to analyze the differences between clinical presentation of first and subsequent episodes of depressive disorders in primary care patients.

Method

A cross-sectional epidemiologic study in primary care centers in Spain was designed. A total of 10?257 primary care patients having a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition major depressive episode were analyzed. Clinical symptoms were measured using the Montgomery Asberg Depression Scale. Patient Health Questionnaire was used to assess somatic symptoms.

Results

There were 40.6% of patients who met the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition criteria for recurrent depression. Compared with those diagnosed of their first major depressive disorder, recurrent patients had greater rates and severity of depressive (t = −7.85, P < .001) and somatic symptoms (t = 5.64, P < .001). The severity of symptoms also increases with number of episodes (F = 40.2, P < .001, for depressive symptoms; F = 27.8, P < .001, for somatic symptoms). First-episode patients were more likely to experience reduced appetite (adjusted odds ratio, 1.2) and suicidal thoughts (adjusted odds ratio, 1.2).

Conclusion

There are differences in the clinical profile of initial and recurrent episodes in primary care depressive patients. Each recurrent depressive episode seems to have a greater impact on symptoms and well-being. The identification of a specific depression symptom profile in first or recurrent episodes is needed to improve the long-term management of major depressive episode patients in primary care settings.