Comparing immunogenicity and efficacy of two different mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines as a fourth dose; six-month follow-up,Israel, 27 December 2021 to 24 July 2022

We assess the immunogenicity and efficacy of Spikevax and Comirnaty as fourth dose COVID-19 vaccines. Six months post-fourth-dose, IgG levels were higher than pre-fourth dose at 1.58-fold (95% CI: 1.27–1.97) in Spikevax and 1.16-fold (95% CI: 0.98–1.37) in Comirnaty vaccinees. Nearly 60% (159/274) of vaccinees contracted SARS-CoV-2. Infection hazard ratios (HRs) for Spikevax (0.82; 95% CI: 0.62–1.09) and Comirnaty (0.86; 95% CI: 0.65–1.13) vaccinees were similar, as were substantial-disease HRs, i.e. 0.28 (95% CI: 0.13–0.62) and 0.51 (95% CI: 0.27–0.96), respectively.     

Differential diagnosis of corneal oedema assisted by in vivo confocal microscopy

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate microstructural differences between clinically similar, but aetiologically different, cases of corneal oedema in four subjects. In vivo confocal microscopy highlighted oedema of the basal epithelium, prominent nerve–keratocyte interactions, and typical ‘epithelialization’ of the endothelium in a case of iridocorneal endothelial syndrome; however, a similar microstructural appearance was observed in a case of presumed herpetic disciform keratitis. The latter diagnosis was subsequently revised on this basis. Confocal examination of Fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy demonstrated oedema of the basal epithelium, prominent wing cells, anterior stromal alterations, fibrosis of Descemet’s membrane and a typical ‘strawberry’ appearance of the endothelium. In contrast, in vivo microstructural examination of bilateral keratoconus with hydrops confirmed oedema mainly involving the epithelium and anterior stroma. In vivo confocal microscopy allows the clinician to observe the living cornea at a microstructural level and to better diagnose and differentiate borderline or unusual cases of corneal oedema.     

The friction of explanted hip prostheses

Charnley prostheses, retrieved at revision surgery, were studied to assess the effects of friction on the total hip replacement procedure. Frictional resistance was measured using the Durham hip function simulator under both dry and lubricated conditions. The friction factor values (f) for the explanted prostheses were found to have a non- Gaussian distribution with medians of 0.13 [inter-quartile range (IQR) 0.10-0.16] and 0.06 (IQR 0.005-0.08) for dry and lubricated (n = 0.01 Pa s) regimes, respectively. New Charnley prostheses had values of f equal to 0.11 +/- 0.025 and 0.04 +/- 0.01 under the same conditions, and showed no large deviation from a Gaussian distribution. There was found to be a statistically significant difference in the medians of the friction factors for new and retrieved prostheses in the lubricated regime. Ingression of cement into the worn region of the cup was found to increase the friction factor significantly under dry conditions. There was no evidence of an increase in the friction factor or torque for those joints that had a loose socket with respect to those that were fixed at revision. A decrease in the frictional torque against number of cycles undergone by the joint in vivo may indicate that a fatigue-type process may have a role in the loosening of the socket. However, this relationship was found not to be significant for friction measured under lubricated conditions and it seems unlikely that the frictional torque generated in this type of prosthesis will contribute significantly to the long-term loosening of the socket.      

The Sheba Medical Center healthcare workers' children's school: can we open schools safely?

ObjectiveThe role of school closure in mitigating coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) transmission has been questioned. In our medical centre, during a 9-week national lockdown, an alternative school was opened for health-care workers' (HCW) children with a small number of children per class and strict symptom surveillance. After lockdown was lifted we screened children and their parents for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) serology.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study of HCW parents and their children after one teacher contracted COVID-19 following exposure at home and 53 children were exposed, isolated and tested by RT-PCR. We compared families with children attending the alternative school with families whose children who remained at home during the 9-week lockdown. Epidemiological and medical data were collected using a short questionnaire; nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs were obtained and tested for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR, and blood was collected for SARS-CoV-2 IgA and IgG titres.ResultsA total of 435 children attended the Sheba alternative school. Among the 53 children exposed to the infected teacher, none tested positive by RT-PCR. Of these, 18 children–parent pairs were tested for serology and all were negative. A total of 106/435 (24%) children and their 78 parents were recruited for the cross-sectional study; 70 attended the Sheba school and 36 did not. Approximately 16% of children in either group reported symptoms (11/70 in the school group and 6/36 in the ‘stay home’ group), but SARS-CoV-2 was not detected by PCR in any, and previous exposure, as determined by serological tests, was low and not significantly different between the groups.ConclusionIn an alternative school for children of HCWs, active during COVID-19 national outbreak, we found no evidence of increased infection compared with children that stayed home.     

Continuous intravenous intradialysis versus intravenous postdialysis erythropoietin therapy in chronic haemodialysis patients: a randomized, controlled, crossover study

Background: Subcutaneous recombinant human erythropoietin seems to be more effective than intravenous administration. Local pain, however, may diminish patient compliance with the subcutaneous route. Recently continuous intravenous intradialysis administration of rHuEpo has been reported to be more efficacious in stimulating erythropoiesis than the usual postdialysis intravenous bolus. Methods: We conducted a randomized, controlled, crossover study on stable chronic haemodialysis patients to compare the efficacy of continuous intradialysis rHuEpo therapy with intravenous postdialysis administration. Twenty patients were selected and randomly assigned to receive rHuEpo either postdialysis (control phase) or by continuous intradialysis perfusion (slow Epo phase) for 12 weeks. After this period, patients were switched to the alternative method for 12 additional weeks. The erythropoietin dose remained unchanged during the study. Haematocrit was monitored weekly and iron metabolism, serum Epo, and vitamins were measured monthly. Urea kinetics and iPTH measurements were performed every 3 months. Results: Three patients were excluded because of unrelated problems. The final mean haematocrit was unchanged from previous basal values in both phases and no statistical differences were found for any parameter between the groups. No differences were found in iron metabolism nor in urea kinetic parameters. Conclusions: Continuous intravenous intradialysis administration of rHuEpo is no more effective than an intravenous postdialysis bolus as rHuEpo maintenance therapy in stable chronic haemodialysis patients.