Interferon Free Hepatitis C Treatment Regimens: The Beginning of Another Era

Hepatitis C is a virus affecting millions worldwide and is a major health risk. With the potentially severe adverse event profile of the current backbone of therapy, interferon, there is an impetus to discover interferon free treatment regimens. With the development of new oral direct acting antivirals, interferon free regimens may be available in the next few years. This article discusses some of the preliminary data from interferon free studies.     

Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Asian Patients: 100 Consecutive Patients in a Single Institution

Background

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) have been shown to improve survival in selected patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. We review our institutional experience with the procedure and evaluate the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates in 100 consecutive patients.

Methods

Data were prospectively collected from 100 consecutive patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis treated by CRS and HIPEC at the National Cancer Centre Singapore between April 2001 and May 2012. Our primary end points were OS and DFS.

Results

Of the 100 patients, 84 were of Chinese ethnicity, 3 were Malay, 6 were Indian, and 7 were of other ethnicities. Primary tumors were ovarian cancer (n = 39), colorectal cancer (n = 28), primary peritoneal (n = 6), appendiceal cancer (n = 20), and mesothelioma (n = 7). Median follow-up duration was 21 months. At 5 years, the DFS was 26.3 % and OS was 50.9 %. Factors influencing OS and DFS were cytoreductive score, primary cancer, and disease-free interval of more than 12 months on univariate analysis. The only factors that remained significant for prognosis after multivariate analysis were primary cancer and cytoreductive score. Thirty-day morbidity was 56 %, and there were no 30-day mortalities.

Conclusions

CRS and HIPEC can be safely carried out in Asian patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from ovarian, colorectal, appendiceal, mesothelioma, and primary peritoneal origins. Overall, the ovarian, appendiceal, mesothelioma, and primary peritoneal cancer patients tended to do better than the colorectal patients, but careful patient selection ensuring that optimal cytoreduction can be achieved is essential for the success of this procedure.     

Adhesives for the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions: a systematic review

ObjectivesTo establish whether simplified adhesives (self-etch) are as clinically effective as conventional adhesives (etch-and-rinse) with multiple application steps for treatment of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs).Null hypothesis: there is no difference in the clinical effectiveness of the four different bonding strategies: Three-step etch-and-rinse; Two-step etch-and-rinse; Two-step self-etch; One-step self-etch for treatment of NCCLs.SourcesElectronic databases were searched including: Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and EMBASE. In addition, studies were identified by handsearching of selected journals.Study selectionRandomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing at least two adhesives in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs), with at least 18 months follow-up were selected. The primary outcome was loss of retention/restoration loss, with marginal adaptation and marginal discolouration as secondary outcomes. Criteria for quality assessment included: random sequence generation; allocation concealment; blinding of outcome assessment; and information on withdrawals. Twenty six studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria. In general, studies were not of sufficient quality to fully address the objectives of this review.ConclusionThere is not enough evidence to support one adhesive or bonding strategy over another for treatment of NCCLs. Consequently, the null hypothesis of no difference cannot be supported or rejected with the data currently available. There is a need for better standardisation and reporting of randomised controlled trials investigating adhesive performance.Clinical significanceStudies with low overall risk of bias demonstrated good clinical performance for adhesives with all four bonding strategies. However, included studies showed wide variation between adhesives of the same category.     

Language Matters: The Autism-Spectrum Quotient in English,Mandarin and Bahasa Malaysia

Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders - The autism-spectrum quotient (AQ) measures autistic traits and has been studied in different countries, sometimes with the English version, and...     

Correction to: Factors Contributing to Psychological Ill#Effects and Resilience of Caregivers of Children with Developmental Disabilities During a Nation#wide Lockdown During the COVID#19 Pandemic

Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders -     

A comparison of feasibility and safety of percutaneous fluoroscopic guided thoracic pedicle screws between Europeans and Asians: is there any difference?

Purpose

To directly compare the safety of fluoroscopic guided percutaneous thoracic pedicle screw placement between Caucasians and Asians.

Methods

This was a retrospective computerized tomography (CT) evaluation study of 880 fluoroscopic guided percutaneous pedicle screws. 440 screws were inserted in 73 European patients and 440 screws were inserted in 75 Asian patients. Screw perforations were classified into Grade 0: no violation; Grade 1: <2 mm perforation; Grade 2: 2–4 mm perforation; and Grade 3: >4 mm perforation. For anterior perforations, the pedicle perforations were classified into Grade 0: no violation, Grade 1: <4 mm perforation; Grade 2: 4–6 mm perforation; and Grade 3: >6 mm perforation.

Results

The inter-rater reliability was adequate with a kappa value of 0.83. The mean age of the study group was 58.3 ± 15.6 years. The indications for surgery were tumor (70.3 %), infection (18.2 %), trauma (6.8 %), osteoporotic fracture (2.7 %) and degenerative diseases (2.0 %). The overall screw perforation rate was 9.7 %, in Europeans 9.1 % and in Asians 10.2 % (p > 0.05). Grade 1 perforation rate was 8.4 %, Grade 2 was 1.2 % and Grade 3 was 0.1 % with no difference in the grade of perforations between Europeans and Asians (p > 0.05). The perforation rate was the highest in T1 (33.3 %), followed by T6 (14.5 %) and T4 (14.0 %). Majority of perforations occurred medially (43.5 %), followed by laterally (25.9 %), and anteriorly (23.5 %). There was no statistical significant difference (p > 0.05) in the perforation rates between right-sided pedicle screws and left-sided pedicle screws (R: 10.0 %, L: 9.3 %).

Conclusions

There were no statistical significant differences in the overall perforation rates, grades of perforations, direction of perforations for implantation of percutaneous thoracic pedicle screws insertion using fluoroscopic guidance between Europeans and Asians. The safety profile for this technique was comparable to the current reported perforation rates for conventional open pedicle screw technique.