Exploring the decision-making preferences of people with colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVES: To explore patient views on participation in treatment, physical care and psychological care decisions and factors that facilitate and hinder patients from making decisions. DESIGN: Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with patients. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Three NHS Trusts in the north-west of England. Theoretical sampling including 41 patients who had been treated for colorectal cancer. RESULTS: For patients, participation in the decision-making process was about being informed and feeling involved in the consultation process, whether patients actually made decisions or not. The perceived availability of treatment choices (surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy) was related to type of treatment. Factors that impacted on whether patients wanted to make decisions included a lack of information, a lack of medical knowledge and trust in medical expertise. Patients perceived that they could have a more participatory role in decisions related to physical and psychological care. CONCLUSION: This study has implications for health professionals aiming to implement policy guidelines that promote patient participation and shared partnerships. Patients in this study wanted to be well informed and involved in the consultation process but did not necessarily want to use the information they received to make decisions. The presentation of choices and preferences for participation may be context specific and it cannot be assumed that patients who do not want to make decisions about one aspect of their care and treatment do not want to make decisions about other aspects of their care and treatment.     

What does it mean to involve consumers successfully in NHS research? A consensus study

OBJECTIVE: To obtain consensus on the principles and indicators of successful consumer involvement in NHS research. DESIGN: Consensus methods were used. An expert workshop, employing the nominal group technique was used to generate potential principles and indicators. A two-round postal Delphi process was used to obtain consensus on the principles and indicators. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Participants were drawn from health, social care, universities and consumer organizations. A purposive sampling strategy was used to identify people who had experience and/or knowledge of consumer involvement in NHS research. Six researchers and seven consumers participated in an expert workshop. Ninety-six people completed both rounds of the Delphi process. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Consensus on principles and indicators of successful consumer involvement in NHS research. RESULTS: Eight principles were developed through an expert workshop and Delphi process, and rated as both clear and valid. Consensus was reached on at least one clear and valid indicator by which to measure each principle. CONCLUSIONS: Consensus has been obtained on eight principles of successful consumer involvement in NHS research. They may help commissioners, researchers and consumers to deepen their understanding of this issue, and can be used to guide good practice.     

角膜塑型术矫正近视二年后的临床观察

目的 :探讨角膜塑型术 (Orthokeratology ,简称Or tho K镜 )矫正近视的远期疗效 ,了解其对近视的矫正及控制近视进展的效果。并观察其安全程度。方法 :配戴Ortho K镜二年以上的青少年近视眼患者 ,共 86例 16 6眼 ,平均年龄(15 .5± 2 .6 )岁 ( 10～ 2 5岁 ) ,平均屈光度 ( - 4 .0 2± 1.78)D( -1.5～ - 7.0D)。对配戴前、后的角膜曲率、角膜地形图、角膜厚度、眼轴、眼压进行检测 ,平均观察期为 ( 2 8.2 5± 3.74 )个月。结果 :配戴前后平均裸眼视力分别为 0 .2 1± 0 .10和0 .99± 0 .2 3,差异有非常显著性 (P <0 .0 1) ;配戴前后角膜水平曲率均值分别为 ( 4 3.0 5± 1.10 )D和 ( 4 0 .84± 1.38)D ;配戴前后眼轴 (眼球前后径 )均值分别为 ( 2 4 .93± 0 .82 )mm和( 2 5 .16± 0 .82 )mm ,每年眼轴增长均值为 ( 0 .12± 0 .4 1)mm ;配戴前后角膜厚度均值分别为 ( 0 .5 6 5± 0 .0 30 )mm和 ( 0 .5 5 7±0 .0 34)mm ,配戴后角膜厚度平均变薄 0 .0 0 9mm ,差异有显著性 (P <0 .0 1) ;配戴前后眼压均值分别为 ( 15 .95± 2 .92 )mmHg和 ( 15 .35± 2 .6 0 )mmHg ,配戴后眼压平均下降 0 .6 0mmHg,差异有显著性 (P <0 .0 1)。配戴Ortho K镜期间有 79眼发生过角膜点状浸润 ,占配戴眼数的 4 7.31%。结论 :Or t     

Social work, general practice and evidence-based policy in the collaborative care of older people: current problems and future possibilities

While collaborative (or joint) working between social services and primary healthcare continues to rise up the policy agenda, current policy is not based on sound evidence of benefit to either patients or the wider community. Both sets of practitioners report benefits for their own work from adopting new arrangements for collaboration. The underlying assumption behind much of this activity is that a greater degree of integration provides benefits to both users and their carers, a perspective that at times obscures the issue of resource availability, especially in the form of practical community services such as district nursing and home help. At the present time there is insufficient evidence to demonstrate that formal arrangements for collaborative working (CW) are better than those forged informally between committed individuals or teams. Furthermore, arrangements for CW have not hitherto been widely evaluated in systematic studies with a comparative design and focus on outcomes for users and carers rather than on processes. In this paper we propose a number of process measures for future evaluation of CW: (1) study populations must be comparable; (2) details of how services are actually delivered must be obtained and colocation should not be assumed to mean collaboration; (3) care packages in areas of comparable resources should be examined; (4) both destinational outcomes and user‐defined evaluations of benefit should be considered; (5) possible disadvantages of integrated care also need to be actively considered; (6) evaluations should include an economic analysis. Those implementing new policies in Primary Care Trusts have, at present, little sound evidence to guide them in their innovative work. However, they should take the opportunity to rigorously test the advantages and disadvantages of collaboration.     

试论医院工程项目的经济评价

工程项目经济评价的战略性、前瞻性、科学性、经济性、有效性和安全性是项目决策的前提与基础。目前,医院对工程项目的经济评价沿用的是传统的成本核算方法,是对医院内部之间的财务成本核算与管理的评价,评价缺乏对医院隐含的成本因素中的战略性定位分析、成本动因分析、价值链分析、全寿命周期经济效益分析和医疗市场发展态势分析。传统的评价方法己不能满足和适应医院战略管理的需要,实施战略成本管理方法,全方位、多角度采集信息,进行战略性的分析、评价,是现阶段医院工程项目经济评价的有效方法。     

基于小波变换纹理分析的医学图像检索

根据医学图像的特点．提出了一种基于哈尔小波变换纹理分析的图像检索方法．并与基于共生矩阵的纹理识别方法进行比较和分析。据此．实现了一个图像检索原型系统。实验证明．本方法具有良好的检索效果。     

Surgical management of intra-abdominal desmoid tumours

BACKGROUND: Intra-abdominal desmoids are uncommon neoplasms. The aggressive nature of these tumours and the potential for major morbidity secondary to resection can present a difficult surgical dilemma. METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed intra-abdominal desmoid tumours undergoing laparotomy were identified from a prospective database. Clinical features and outcomes in this group were evaluated. RESULTS: The study group comprised 24 patients. Sixteen patients underwent complete resection of the tumour while eight had biopsy only, with or without intestinal bypass. Small intestinal resection was performed in 12 patients, including three who had a near-total enterectomy. Median follow-up was 62 months, with an actuarial overall survival rate of 73 per cent at 10 years. There was no difference in survival rate between completely resected and unresected patients (P = 0.73). There were seven deaths in the entire group, of which four were in those undergoing complete resection. CONCLUSION: Operation can cure patients with intra-abdominal desmoid tumours, but may result in significant morbidity, especially from loss of small intestine. No other therapy is a predictably good alternative to operation but the natural history of desmoids is often characterized by prolonged periods of stability or even regression. A period of watchful waiting, until significant symptoms develop, may be the most appropriate course in patients who risk mesenteric vascular injury or substantial enterectomy with attempts at resection.     

NP与EP方案治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的比较

为观察比较长春瑞滨（NVB）联合顺铂（DDP）组成的NP方案与依托泊苷（Vp-16）联合DDP组成的EP方案,治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌（non-small cell lung cancer,NSCLC）的疗效和毒性反应,选取82例晚期NSCLC患者,随机分为NP和EP两组进行化疗.结果示,NP组有效率为52.5%（21/40）,EP组有效率为28.6%（12/42）,NP组疗效优于EP组,但差异尚无统计学意义,u=1.855,P=0.064.两组剂量限制毒性均为骨髓抑制,消化道反应可以耐受.初步研究结果提示,NP方案治疗晚期NSCLC的疗效高于EP方案.