Comparison of onset and steady-state responses of hearing aids: implications for use of the auditory brainstem response in the selection of hearing aids

Input-output (I/O) functions of hearing aids were measured in response to a 2000-Hz tone burst, having 0.5 ms rise/fall time and 10 ms duration. I/O functions, measured with a hearing-aid analyzer, served as reference conditions. Hearing-aid outputs at onset and during the steady-state portion of the waveform differed; these differences often depended upon stimulus rate. The relation between onset and steady-state estimates of output were not always predictable from hearing-aid attack and release times. These findings indicate that the steady-state output limitation characteristics of hearing aids cannot be estimated from their onset responses. In turn, this suggests that ABR measurements may not provide accurate estimates of the compressive characteristics of hearing aids.     

T cell subsets in human colostrum

Lymphocytes from 10 paired colostrum and peripheral blood specimens were examined to determine if the colostral T cell population differs from the peripheral blood T cell population in subset distribution. The percentages of lymphocytes staining with OKT3, OKT4, and OKT8 murine monoclonal antibody were determined. Lymphocytes from colostrum were 74.7 +/- 2.5% OKT3+, 50.6 +/- 2.3% OKT4+, 24.0 +/- 1.7% OKT8+, whereas peripheral blood lymphocytes were 78.7 +/- 1.9% OKT3+, 48.4 +/- 1.4% OKT4+, and 29.8 +/- 1.6% OKT8+. The percentage of colostrum lymphocytes positive for OKT3 was significantly although not strikingly lower than the OKT3 percentage for blood lymphocytes (p less than 0.05). This difference was due to the lower percentage of OKT8 positive lymphocytes in colostrum compared with blood (p less than 0.01). Although the T cell subset distribution of colostrum generally appears to be similar to that in the peripheral blood, there were small differences in OKT3 and OKT8 percentages that were statistically significant suggesting the possibility of some selectivity of the colostral T cell population.     

The effects of severe visual challenges on steering performance in visually healthy young drivers.

PURPOSE: Two experiments explored the extent to which induced blur, reduced luminance, and reduced visual fields affect drivers' steering performance in a driving simulator. METHODS: In experiment 1, ten young participants (M = 21.2 years) drove at approximately 89 km/h (55 mph) along a curvy roadway while being exposed to blur (0 to + 10 D), luminance (0.003 to 16.7 cd/m), and visual field (1.7 and 150 degrees) manipulations. In experiment 2, a new group of ten young participants (M = 18.5 years) drove while exposed to seven visual field sizes (1.7 to 150 degrees). RESULTS: Steering was sensitive to a reduced field size but not to the blur and luminance challenges. Acuity, on the other hand, was sensitive to the blur and luminance challenges but not to reduced field size. DISCUSSION: In healthy young drivers, steering performance is remarkably robust to severe blur and to extremely low luminances. These results support a key element of the selective degradation hypothesis advanced by Leibowitz and colleagues--that steering abilities are preserved at night even when the ability to recognize objects and hazards is not. Additional research should address the other element of this hypothesis--that drivers fail to appreciate the extent to which their visual abilities are degraded at night.