Psychometric properties of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) pediatric item bank peer relationships in the Dutch general population

Quality of Life Research - This study aimed to validate the PROMIS Pediatric item bank v2.0 Peer Relationships and compare reliability of the full item bank to its short form, computerized adaptive...     

Course and prognosis of knee complaints in general practice

OBJECTIVE: Patients frequently present with knee complaints in general practice. Information about the course and prognosis of knee complaints is needed to inform patients and facilitate decisions on referral and treatment. The objective of the study was to assess the course of knee complaints and to identify predictors of outcome in patients visiting their general practitioner with a new episode of knee complaints. METHODS: Data were collected by means of self-administered questionnaires. After 3 and 12 months of followup, the following outcomes were assessed: perceived recovery, change in pain, and change in physical functioning. As potential predictors of outcome, several sociodemographic variables, characteristics of the symptom, baseline scores of the outcome measures, and intra- and extra-individual variables were analyzed using multiple regression analyses. RESULTS: We included 251 patients with a new episode of knee complaints presented in general practice. Only 25% reported recovery after 3 months, increasing to 44% after 12 months. A history of knee complaints, a longer duration of the current episode of knee complaints, other coexisting musculoskeletal complaints, and a higher level of distress were associated with a worse prognosis. In the linear regression models, 41-53% of the variance in pain reduction and improvement in functioning could be explained by the predictors. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves, estimating the predictive accuracy of the Cox regression models concerning perceived recovery, was 0.77 after 3 months and 0.72 after 12 months. CONCLUSION: Many patients did not recover after 12 months. Distress was found to be strongly associated with less pain reduction and less improvement in functioning.     

Quality of life after curative or palliative surgical treatment of pancreatic and periampullary carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Quality of life (QOL) is an important outcome measure after treatment of pancreatic and periampullary carcinoma. The aim of this prospective longitudinal study was to analyse QOL after surgery for resectable pancreatic or periampullary carcinoma. METHODS: Patients with potentially resectable tumours underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (n = 72) or a double-bypass procedure (n = 42). They were asked to complete a questionnaire before laparotomy and at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after surgery. Fifty-nine patients completed a shortened questionnaire on a weekly basis. RESULTS: There was a temporary decrease in physical and gastrointestinal functioning after pancreaticoduodenectomy. A similar decrease in QOL was observed after double bypass, as well as decreases in mental functioning and overall QOL. Almost all QOL scores returned to preoperative values by about 3 months after surgery, although only briefly so in patients who had a double-bypass procedure. There were no differences between groups in the terminal stages of disease. A rapid decrease on all QOL scales was observed in the last 8 weeks before death. CONCLUSION: Surgery for pancreatic and periampullary carcinoma was not associated with irreversible impairment or protracted recovery of QOL. The relatively long plateau phase after recovery supports the argument for surgical treatment, including surgical palliation in selected patients.     

Health-related and overall quality of life of patients with chronic hip and knee complaints in general practice

Background: Information about quality of life of patients with chronic hip or knee complaints in general practice is scarce. This study describes the health-related and overall quality of life (HRQL) of these complaints. Methods: Data were obtained from a cohort study in general practice. HRQL at three months follow-up was analysed. HRQL was measured as: symptoms, physical, psychological and social functioning, and general health perceptions, using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) and the MOS 36-item short-form-health survey (SF-36). Overall quality of life was measured using a 5-point rating scale. Results: The results show that patients with chronic hip or knee complaints have a substantial lower HRQL compared to patients who had recovered from baseline hip or knee complaints. The largest effect was found on symptoms and physical functioning: up to 2.9 standard deviations below patients who had recovered from baseline hip or knee complaints. Scores of patients with both chronic hip and knee complaints were significantly worse than scores of patients with only knee complaints on most subscales. Conclusion: In patients with chronic hip or knee complaints the worst scores were seen on scales that measure symptoms and physical functioning, but still a substantially lower score was obtained for overall quality of life. Quality of life was poorer for patients with both chronic hip and knee complaints compared to those with chronic hip or knee complaints only.     

When to use agreement versus reliability measures

BACKGROUND: Reproducibility concerns the degree to which repeated measurements provide similar results. Agreement parameters assess how close the results of the repeated measurements are, by estimating the measurement error in repeated measurements. Reliability parameters assess whether study objects, often persons, can be distinguished from each other, despite measurement errors. In that case, the measurement error is related to the variability between persons. Consequently, reliability parameters are highly dependent on the heterogeneity of the study sample, while the agreement parameters, based on measurement error, are more a pure characteristic of the measurement instrument. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using an example of an interrater study, in which different physical therapists measure the range of motion of the arm in patients with shoulder complaints, the differences and relationships between reliability and agreement parameters for continuous variables are illustrated. CONCLUSION: If the research question concerns the distinction of persons, reliability parameters are the most appropriate. But if the aim is to measure change in health status, which is often the case in clinical practice, parameters of agreement are preferred.     

Artificial crystalline lens

If presbyopia is caused by hardening of the crystalline lens, replacing it with a material with mechanical properties similar to the young crystalline lens should restore accommodative ability. Such a silicone material has been developed. Refilling the capsular bag with this material results in 3 to 5 D of accommodation in primates in response to pilocarpine.     

Predicting sequelae and death after bacterial meningitis in childhood: A systematic review of prognostic studies

Background  

Bacterial meningitis (BM) is a severe infection responsible for high mortality and disabling sequelae. Early identification of patients at high risk of these outcomes is necessary to prevent their occurrence by adequate treatment as much as possible. For this reason, several prognostic models have been developed. The objective of this study is to summarize the evidence regarding prognostic factors predicting death or sequelae due to BM in children 0-18 years of age.     

Sleep and Sleep Disturbance in Children: Reliability and Validity of the Dutch Version of the Child Sleep Habits Questionnaire

Study Objectives:

The Child Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ) was developed in the US for measuring medical and behavioral sleep disorders in school-aged children. This study was conducted to assess the reliability and structural validity of the Dutch version of the CSHQ.

Design:

Population-based study

Setting:

Questionnaires (n = 2385) were distributed to children in primary schools and daycare centers to be completed by the parent/guardian. An identical second questionnaire was distributed for test-retest and interobserver reliability, which were assessed using intraclass correlation, and compared with published data. Internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach α (per subscale). Validity was analyzed by confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis.

Participants:

School-aged children.

Interventions:

None.

Measurements & Results:

The questionnaire was returned by 1502 (63%) parents, 47% returned the questionnaire for test-retest, and 32% for interobserver reliability. Test-retest reliability was moderate to good, ranging from 0.47 to 0.93. Interobserver reliability was moderate to good, ranging from 0.53 to 0.87, with the exception of Sleep duration. Cronbach α ranged from 0.47 to 0.68. In confirmatory factor analysis the domain structure of the original American CSHQ could not be confirmed. Exploratory factor analysis suggested a 4-factor structure rather than the original 8 domains.

Conclusions:

The CSHQ seems to have an adequate reliability and moderate internal consistency in a Dutch population with different sociocultural characteristics than the US population in which it was devised. Factor analysis suggests that translation, cultural background, or subscales of the original instrument may affect the performance of the CSHQ.

Citation:

Waumans RC; Terwee CB; Van den Berg G; Knol DL; Van Litsenburg RRL; Gemke RJBJ. Sleep and sleep disturbance in children: reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the Child Sleep Habits Questionnaire. SLEEP 2010;33(6):841-845.