Updated consensus guidelines on the management of Phelan–McDermid syndrome

Phelan–McDermid syndrome (PMS) is a genetic condition caused by SHANK3 haploinsufficiency and characterized by a wide range of neurodevelopmental and systemic manifestations. The first practice parameters for assessment and monitoring in individuals with PMS were published in 2014; recently, knowledge about PMS has grown significantly based on data from longitudinal phenotyping studies and large-scale genotype–phenotype investigations. The objective of these updated clinical management guidelines was to: (1) reflect the latest in knowledge in PMS and (2) provide guidance for clinicians, researchers, and the general community. A taskforce was established with clinical experts in PMS and representatives from the parent community. Experts joined subgroups based on their areas of specialty, including genetics, neurology, neurodevelopment, gastroenterology, primary care, physiatry, nephrology, endocrinology, cardiology, gynecology, and dentistry. Taskforce members convened regularly between 2021 and 2022 and produced specialty-specific guidelines based on iterative feedback and discussion. Taskforce leaders then established consensus within their respective specialty group and harmonized the guidelines. The knowledge gained over the past decade allows for improved guidelines to assess and monitor individuals with PMS. Since there is limited evidence specific to PMS, intervention mostly follows general guidelines for treating individuals with developmental disorders. Significant evidence has been amassed to guide the management of comorbid neuropsychiatric conditions in PMS, albeit mainly from caregiver report and the experience of clinical experts. These updated consensus guidelines on the management of PMS represent an advance for the field and will improve care in the community. Several areas for future research are also highlighted and will contribute to subsequent updates with more refined and specific recommendations as new knowledge accumulates.     

Human combinatorial libraries yield rare antibodies that broadly neutralize hepatitis C virus

One way to dissect the antibody response to an invading microorganism is to clone the antibody repertoire from immune donors and subsequently characterize the specific antibodies. Recently, methodological advances have allowed investigations of neutralizing antibodies against hepatitis C virus (HCV) in vitro. We have investigated three human mAbs, previously isolated from an individual infected with HCV of genotype 2b, that are known to cross-react in a binding assay to the envelope E2 protein of genotypes 1a and 1b. We now report that two of them have a neutralizing activity with a breadth not previously observed. Indeed, mAbs 1:7 and A8 recognized E2 from all of the six major genotypes, and they neutralized retroviral pseudoparticles [HCV pseudoparticles (HCVpp)] carrying genetically equally diverse HCV envelope glycoproteins. Importantly, these antibodies were also able to neutralize the cell culture infectious HCV clone JFH-1 in vitro, with IC(50) values of 60 ng/ml and 560 ng/ml, respectively. The conformational epitopes of these two broadly reactive antibodies were overlapping yet distinct and involved amino acid residues in the 523-535 region of E2, known to be important for the E2-CD81 interaction. The third antibody clone, representing a dominant population in the initial screen for these antibodies, was less broadly reactive and was unable to neutralize the genotype 2a infectious clone JFH-1. Our results confirm at the clonal level that broadly neutralizing human anti-HCV antibodies can be elicited and that the region amino acids 523-535 of the HCV envelope glycoprotein E2 carries neutralizing epitopes conserved across all genotypes.     

LIPOPROTEIN(α) IN HEALTH AND DISEASE

SUMMARY Elevated plasma levels of Lp(a) do seem to influence the progression of atherosclerosis. Evidence is emerging that certain apo(a) isoforms may be more atherogenic than others, and in transgenic mice free apo(a) has been shown to be associated with accelerated atherosclerosis. Currently it is not known whether treating elevated Lp(a) levels will reduce progression of atherosclerosis and, as therapeutic options are limited, mass screening of Lp(a) levels in populations is not indicated. The presence of raised Lp(a) levels, however, warrants aggressive treatment to reduce other cardiovascular risk factors. Continuing research to investigate the relationship of the apo(a) gene to other genes, including the plasminogen gene and apo(a)-related genes, will add further information pertaining to the evolution, function, regulation and clinical implications of Lp(a).