Prevalence and Risk Factors of Spine,Shoulder, Hand,Hip, and Knee Osteoarthritis in Community-dwelling Koreans Older Than Age 65 Years

Background

Osteoarthritis (OA) is common and disabling among older patients around the world. Data exploring the prevalence and risk factors of OA are of paramount importance in establishing healthcare policies. However, few studies have evaluated these topics among Asian populations.

Questions/purposes

This study was conducted to determine the prevalence and risk factors of radiographic OA in the spine, shoulder, hand, hip, and knee in Koreans older than age 65 years.

Methods

A simple random sample (N = 1118) was drawn from a roster of elderly individuals older than age 65 years in Seongnam. Of the 1118 invited subjects, 696 (males = 298, females = 398) participated in this study (a response rate of 62%). The mean age of respondents was 72 ± 5 years (range, 65–91 years). Radiographs of the lumbar spine, shoulder, hand, hip, and knee were taken and afterward evaluated for radiographic OA. The Kellgren-Lawrence grading system was used for all mentioned joints, and radiographic OA was defined as Grade 2 changes or higher. The association of sex, aging, and obesity with OA in each of the mentioned joints was determined with the help of multivariate logistic regression.

Results

The highest prevalence of radiographic OA was seen in the spine (number of subjects with OA/number of whole population = 462 of 696 [66%]) followed by the hand (415 of 692 [60%]), knee (265 of 696 [38%]), shoulder (36 of 696 [5%]), and hip (15 of 686 [2%]). Female sex was associated with knee OA (odds ratio [OR], 5.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.9–8.4; p < 0.001) and hand OA (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.6–3.1; p < 0.001), and male sex was associated with spine OA (OR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.5–1.0; p = 0.025). Aging was associated with radiographic OA in the spine, knee, and hand (OR per 5-year increments, 1.3 [95% CI, 1.1–1.6; p = 0.001], 1.6 [95% CI, 1.4–1.9; p < 0.001], and 1.4 [95% CI, 1.2–1.7; p < 0.001]), respectively) but not associated with OA in the hip and shoulder. Obesity was associated with knee OA (OR, 3.4; 95% CI, 2.4–5.0; p < 0.001) and spine OA (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1–2.2; p = 0.014) but not with OA in other joints.

Conclusions

OA of the spine, hand, and knee is likely to become a major public health problem rather than shoulder and hip OA in Korea. Associations of demographic factors with radiographic OA differed among each joint, and that would be valuable information to assess the role and influence of risk factors of OA in various joints.

Level of Evidence

Level III, prognostic study.     

DNA Methylation Variants at HIF3A Locus,B-Vitamin Intake,and Long-term Weight Change: Gene-Diet Interactions in Two U.S. Cohorts

The first epigenome-wide association study of BMI identified DNA methylation at an HIF3A locus associated with BMI. We tested the hypothesis that DNA methylation variants are associated with BMI according to intake of B vitamins. In two large cohorts, we found significant interactions between the DNA methylation–associated HIF3A single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs3826795 and intake of B vitamins on 10-year changes in BMI. The association between rs3826795 and BMI changes consistently increased across the tertiles of total vitamin B₂ and B₁₂ intake (all P for interaction <0.01). The differences in the BMI changes per increment of minor allele were −0.10 (SE 0.06), −0.01 (SE 0.06), and 0.12 (SE 0.07) within subgroups defined by increasing tertiles of total vitamin B₂ intake and −0.10 (SE 0.06), −0.01 (SE 0.06), and 0.10 (SE 0.07) within subgroups defined by increasing tertiles of total vitamin B₁₂ intake. In two independent cohorts, a DNA methylation variant in HIF3A was associated with BMI changes through interactions with total or supplemental vitamin B₂, vitamin B₁₂, and folate. These findings suggest a potential causal relation between DNA methylation and adiposity.     

Intravenous Lidocaine for Effective Pain Relief After a Laparoscopic Colectomy: A Prospective,Randomized, Double-Blind,Placebo-Controlled Study

A perioperative intravenous lidocaine infusion has been reported to decrease postoperative pain. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of intravenous lidocaine in reducing postoperative pain for laparoscopic colectomy patients. Fifty-five patients scheduled for an elective laparoscopic colectomy were randomly assigned to 2 groups. Group L received an intravenous bolus injection of lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg before intubation, followed by 2 mg/kg/h continuous infusion during the operation. Group C received the same dosage of saline at the same time. Postoperative pain was assessed at 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 hours after surgery by using the visual analog scale (VAS). Fentanyl consumption by patient-controlled plus investigator-controlled rescue administration and the total number of button pushes were measured at 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 hours after surgery. In addition, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were checked on the operation day and postoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 5. VAS scores were significantly lower in group L than group C until 24 hours after surgery. Fentanyl consumption was lower in group L than group C until 12 hours after surgery. Moreover, additional fentanyl injections and the total number of button pushes appeared to be lower in group L than group C (P < 0.05). The CRP level tended to be lower in group L than group C, especially on postoperative day1 and 2 and appeared to be statistically significant. The satisfaction score was higher in group L than group C (P = 0.024). Intravenous lidocaine infusion during an operation reduces pain after a laparoscopic colectomy.Key words: Analgesics, Colectomy, Pain, LidocaineBecause of a substantial increase in the incidence of benign and malignant tumors of the colon, the number of laparoscopic colorectal surgeries has increased.¹ Laparoscopic colectomy appears to be less painful, involves less bleeding, and has a faster recovery than an open colectomy.² Further, laparoscopic colorectal surgery has been proven to be beneficial in comparison with robot-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery in many aspects.³ However, postoperative pain because of surgical incision is still an issue that requires resolution. Therefore, various clinical applications such as intrathecal morphine, epidural analgesia, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are used to control pain after a laparoscopic colectomy.^4,5 However, optimal management has not yet been established. A regional block can have technical difficulties and complications. The epidural failure rate has been reported up to 40%, and other drugs, such as opioids or NSAIDs, have side effects or drug allergies.^5,6Intravenous lidocaine is inexpensive, easy to inject, and a relatively safe drug.⁷ A number of studies showed that intravenous lidocaine has analgesic, anti-hyperalgesic, and anti-inflammatory properties, as well as a fast recovery, reducing the hospital stay and the time for bowel function recovery.^8–10 In addition, lidocaine in a nontoxic concentration has been reported to decrease the variant volatile anesthesia requirement in an animal study.¹⁰ Therefore, the authors aimed to determine whether a continuous infusion of intravenous lidocaine would have an adequate postoperative analgesic effect for a laparoscopic colectomy. The hypothesis of this study was that an intravenous lidocaine infusion during an operation could decrease postoperative pain.     

氨甲环酸对类风湿关节炎患者全髋关节置换围手术期失血的影响

目的：探索氨甲环酸对类风湿关节炎患者全髋关节置换围手术期失血的影响。方法回顾性分析2012年6月至2014年6月行初次全髋关节置换术患者资料,仅纳入因类风湿关节炎（Steinbrocker 3、4级）行初次单侧全髋关节置换术患者数据,最终纳入197例。其中68例术前20 min静脉滴注氨甲环酸15 mg/kg（单次给药组）,74例术前20 min静脉滴注氨甲环酸15 mg/kg+术后3 h再次静脉滴注氨甲环酸10 mg/kg（重复给药组）,55例未使用氨甲环酸（对照组）。单次给药组女52例、男16例,平均年龄58岁;重复给药组女54例、男20例,平均年龄59岁;对照组女40例、男15例,平均年龄55岁。比较三组患者总失血量、输血率、深静脉血栓及肺栓塞发生率、术后引流量、术后血红蛋白下降值及并发症情况。结果单次给药组、重复给药组和对照组围手术期总失血量分别为（816.80±245.09）ml、（975.15±216.33）ml和（1295.68±263.85）ml,术后引流量为（221.60±70.05）ml、（337.20±113.10）ml和（479.74±120.66）ml,输血率为5.41%、10.29%和25.45%,术后血红蛋白降低值为（2.71±0.74）g/dl、（3.18±0.62）g/dl和（3.83±0.70）g/dl;各指标给药组均较对照组低,重复给药组较单次给药组围手术期总失血量、输血率、术后引流量更低。术后三组患者均未发生深静脉血栓及肺栓塞;单次给药组8例、重复给药组6例、对照组8例出现切口并发症,发生率分别为11.8%（8/68）、8.1%（6/74）、14.5%（8/55）,三者比较差异无统计学意义（χ2=1.355,P=0.508）。结论静脉使用氨甲环酸可有效降低类风湿关节炎患者全髋关节置换围手术期总失血量与输血率,且不增加血栓事件的风险,相对于术前单次使用氨甲环酸,更推荐术前及术后3h重复给药。