The effect of intravenous insulin,apheresis and oral lipid-lowering agents on non-fasting hypertriglyceridemia and associated pancreatitis

Objectives: There is evidence that increasing severity of hypertriglyceridemia increases the risk of acute pancreatitis. There is a debate about superiority of treatment methods and previous works have specifically called for direct comparison between IV insulin and apheresis techniques. Identify patient characteristics predictive of lipid-lowering therapy selection in a large community hospital for treatment of hypertriglyceridemia; evaluate for a concentration-dependent relationship between hypertriglyceridemia severity and risk of acute pancreatitis; assess for differences in clinical outcomes between patients treated with IV insulin versus apheresis.

Methods: Single center, retrospective cohort study including patients with hypertriglyceridemia between January 2007 and December 2016. Main measures included frequency of pancreatitis, choice of lipid-lowering therapy, and clinical comparisons of diet, oral lipid-lowering agents, IV insulin, and apheresis.

Results: Initial serum triglyceride level and disease acuity was higher among patients in insulin and apheresis groups. Neither triglyceride level, Charlson comorbidity index, age, BISAP score, nor initial CRP predicted use of IV insulin versus apheresis. Prevalence of pancreatitis increased with higher triglyceride level, reaching 48% with triglycerides >2000 md/dL (p < 0.001). There was a significant decrease in serum triglycerides at each time interval (p < 0.05) in patients treated with IV insulin and apheresis, but no difference in clearance rate between the two. Length of stay did not differ between IV insulin and apheresis.

Conclusion: The presence of pancreatitis, hyperglycemia, and hypertriglyceridemia severity influenced selection of therapies like IV insulin and apheresis. We found no superiority of either IV insulin or apheresis in the treatment of severe hypertriglyceridemia among patients hospitalized for pancreatitis.     

Feasibility of intravascular ultrasound studies: Predictors of imaging success before coronary interventions

Background: Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is currently used to study lesions during transcatheter coronary therapy. However, before dilation some lesions cannot be reached or crossed with the imaging catheter. Hypothesis: This study seeks to elucidate which factors determine the feasibility of IVUS examination before coronary interventions. Methods: Accordingly, 100 consecutive patients undergoing IVUS examination before coronary angioplasty were prospectively studied. The clinical and angiographic characteristics of 77 patients with a successful IVUS study (Group A) were compared with those of 23 patients in whom IVUS was attempted but the target lesion could not be interrogated (Group B). The echogenic characteristics of the target lesion [before (n = 77) or after intervention (in 18 patients in Group B)] were also studied. Results: Patients in Group B were significantly older (62 ± 7 vs. 57 ± 10 years, p < 0.05) and more frequently had stable angina [8 (35%) vs. 9 (11%), p < 0.05]. The distribution of lesions within the coronary tree and angiographic lesion characteristics including length, eccentricity, calcification, bend location, and the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association classification were similar in both groups. However, proximal tortuosities (>45° at end diastole) were more frequently found in Group B [20 (87%) vs. 47 (61%), p < 0.05]. In addition, by quantitative angiography, patients in Group B had smaller arteries (reference diameter 2.8 ± 0.4 vs. 3.1 ± 0.4 mm, p < 0.05) and more severe lesions (minimal lumen diameter 0.46 ± 0.24 vs. 0.65 ± 0.34 mm, p < 0.05). On IVUS, calcified lesions were more frequently visualized in Group B (61 vs. 38%, p < 0.05). On multivariate analysis, catheter size, baseline minimal lumen diameter, angiographic proximal tortuosities, and lesion calcification on imaging were independent predictors of the feasibility of IVUS studies. Conclusions: Unsuccessful IVUS studies before intervention occur more frequently (1) in vessels with proximal tortuosities or severe lumen narrowing, (2) in lesions that are calcified on IVUS, and (3) when large imaging catheters are used.     

Emergency cardiopulmonary bypass support in patients with cardiac arrest in the catheterization laboratory

Cardiac arrest in the catheterization laboratory is fatal if unresponsive to advanced cardiac life support (ACLS). Seven patients not responding to ACLS following cardiac arrest in the catheterization laboratory underwent percutaneously instituted cardiopulmonary bypass support. Cardiac arrest occurred following abrupt closure postcoronary angioplasty in three patients, during cardiogenic shock in three patients, and during diagnostic angiography in one patient. Cardiopulmonary bypass was instituted 10-45 min (mean, 21 min) following the onset of cardiac arrest. Flows on bypass ranged from 4.0 to 5.2 liter/min. Mean blood pressure ranged from 70 to 110 mm Hg on bypass. Six of the seven patients regained consciousness after the institution of bypass. Acid-base balance was normalized in all patients. Coronary bypass surgery was subsequently performed in three patients and coronary angioplasty in two. Four patients survived. One patient died following coronary bypass surgery. Two patients, who were not suitable candidates for revascularization, expired. Total bypass time was 1.5-8.5 hr (mean, 2.7 hr). At a mean follow-up of 6 months, all four survivors are alive and asymptomatic or NYHA class 1. We conclude that cardiopulmonary bypass support 1) can stabilize patients following cardiac arrest in the catheterization laboratory, 2) can facilitate emergency coronary angioplasty or transfer to the operating room for coronary bypass surgery, and (3) can improve survival in patients unresponsive to ACLS when instituted early following cardiac arrest in the catheterization laboratory.     

Imaging of dental infections

Emergency Radiology - Dental infections are a common presentation in the emergency department (ED). To help guide clinical management for these infections, the radiologist must be familiar with the...