Treatment of myofascial trigger points in common shoulder disorders by physical therapy: A randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN75722066]

Background  

Shoulder disorders are a common health problem in western societies. Several treatment protocols have been developed for the clinical management of persons with shoulder pain. However available evidence does not support any protocol as being superior over others. Systematic reviews provide some evidence that certain physical therapy interventions (i.e. supervised exercises and mobilisation) are effective in particular shoulder disorders (i.e. rotator cuff disorders, mixed shoulder disorders and adhesive capsulitis), but there is an ongoing need for high quality trials of physical therapy interventions. Usually, physical therapy consists of active exercises intended to strengthen the shoulder muscles as stabilizers of the glenohumeral joint or perform mobilisations to improve restricted mobility of the glenohumeral or adjacent joints (shoulder girdle). It is generally accepted that a-traumatic shoulder problems are the result of impingement of the subacromial structures, such as the bursa or rotator cuff tendons. Myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) in shoulder muscles may also lead to a complex of symptoms that are often seen in patients diagnosed with subacromial impingement or rotator cuff tendinopathy. Little is known about the treatment of MTrPs in patients with shoulder disorders.     

Setting targets: a three-stage model for determining priorities for health promotion

This paper describes a three-stage model for setting targets for health promotion. The model was developed in 1992 in response to the need to identify priority areas for health promotion for women in the Hunter Region of New South Wales. The approach enabled epidemiological data and views from the community to be synthesised and integrated with those of experts from health and social services (key informants), using a nominal group process. The reliability of the method was investigated by replicating the process with two groups of key informants. There was considerable commonality in the targets generated by the two groups. The process resulted in the identification of seven targets that reflected the concerns of the community and local experts as well as the health priorities suggested by local epidemiological data. The model used could be adapted for determining priorities in a wide range of health and health care settings, where available resources restrict the range of services or activities which can be offered. (Aust J Public Health 1995; 19: 263–9)     

Effect of calcium replacement on the hemodynamic changes associated with high dose interleukin-2 therapy.

Administration of high-dose IL-2 results in hemodynamic changes that are similar to those seen in septic shock. These include a decrease in systemic vascular resistance (SVR) with a resultant drop in mean arterial pressure (MAP). Hypocalcemia is seen in septic shock and with IL-2 administration. Calcium replacement in septic shock has been reported to result in hemodynamic improvement; we therefore administered calcium to patients receiving high dose IL-2 to correct ionized hypocalcemia. Five consecutive patients underwent invasive hemodynamic monitoring before and during IL-2 administration. Calcium chloride was administered to correct ionized hypocalcemia, and hemodynamic parameters were monitored before and after calcium administration. Ionized hypocalcemia was associated with an elevation in parathyroid hormone levels. There was no toxicity related to the administration of calcium. An improvement in the MAP and SVR was seen early and late (after a dose of IL-2 was held) in the IL-2 treatment cycle; there were minimal effects at other points. Because of the potential hemodynamic benefit of calcium replacement, we recommend that ionized hypocalcemia be corrected in patients receiving high-dose IL-2.     

Early detection of colorectal cancer: a profile of current practice.

This study examines the prevalence of colorectal cancer screening among individuals in the general community. The survey was undertaken as part of a large scale general population survey of health practices and attitudes. A sample of 1090 people aged 40 years and over with no previous history of colorectal cancer or other predisposing condition was interviewed. Only 56% of this group reported that they regularly checked their bowel movements, the toilet bowl, or the toilet paper for signs of rectal bleeding. Only 13% could recall a doctor ever advising them to check for rectal bleeding; and 21% could recall a doctor asking them if they had ever noticed blood in their bowel movements. More involved practitioner-based procedures, such as digital rectal examination, fecal occult blood testing, endoscopy, and barium enema, were reported by only a minority of participants. Analysis of screening rates in the 9.3% of people who reported a family history of colorectal cancer revealed that this higher risk group was no more likely to be screened than those at average risk.     

Detection of alcohol-related problems in general practice.

While primary care has considerable potential as a site for detecting and intervening for alcohol-related problems, few doctors currently identify these problems. The judgments of eight primary care physicians about alcohol-related problems in 371 of their patients were compared with the patients' responses to the Short Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (SMAST) and the CAGE. The CAGE classified 11.4% of the patients as alcoholics and the SMAST identified 23.9% as probable alcoholics. However, the doctors identified only a small proportion (7.0%) of their patients as having any level of alcohol-related problem. The doctors did not identify 65.0% of CAGE-defined alcoholics and 82.3% of those patients classified by the SMAST as probable alcoholics. The discrepancy between primary care physician's judgments and the SMAST and CAGE may be attributable to the doctor's failure to identify patients with alcohol-related problems. An alternative explanation is that the SMAST and CAGE are inappropriate screening tools for use in Australian primary care. The findings are discussed in terms of the implications for training doctors and for the development of better measures of alcohol-related problems for use within a primary care context.