Adoption of the 275-patient buprenorphine treatment waiver for treating opioid use disorder: A state-level longitudinal analysis

Abstract

Background: Increasing access to buprenorphine treatment is a critical tool for addressing the opioid epidemic in the United States. In 2016, a federal policy change allowed physicians who meet specific requirements to treat up to 275 concurrent buprenorphine patients. This study examines state-level measures of buprenorphine treatment supply over 21?months since this policy change and estimates associations between the supply of 275-patient waivers and state characteristics. Methods: Monthly state-level measures of the number of physicians holding the 275-patient waiver per 100,000 residents were constructed from September 2016 to May 2018 using the Drug Enforcement Agency’s Controlled Substance Act database. State characteristics were obtained from publicly available sources. Mixed-effects regression models were estimated to examine change over time. Results: During the 21-month period, the number of physicians waivered to treat 275 patients increased from 153 to 4009 physicians. The mean supply of 275-patient physicians per 100,000 state residents significantly increased from 0.07 (SD?=?0.21) in September 2016 to 1.43 (SD?=?1.08) in May 2018 (t?=??9.84, df?=?50, P?<?.001). The final mixed-effects regression model indicated that Census division and the preexisting supply of 100-patient waivered physicians were correlated with the rate of growth in 275-patient waivers over the study period. Conclusions: Although uptake of the 275-patient waiver has exceeded initial projections, growth is uneven across the United States. Unequal patterns of growth pose a challenge to efforts to increase treatment availability as a means of addressing the opioid epidemic.     

Assessing the impact of capacity building for HIV activists in Europe and Central Asia

ABSTRACT

STEP-UP is a capacity building and training programme for HIV community activists in Europe and Central Asia, led by the European AIDS Treatment Group (EATG). The programme aims to empower a new cohort of HIV activists each year to engage more deeply in HIV activism at local and national levels addressing key themes such as HIV treatment literacy, prevention technologies, living with HIV, project development, clinical trials, patient participation, advocacy and policy landscapes. The expected outcome of the project is that trainees become activists with knowledge of both policy and science who advocate for change to policy and or practice. To assess the impact of the programme on individual graduates, their organisations and the communities they work with, EATG conducted an evaluation of the programme for the period of 2013–2017. The methods used during the assessment were: a desk review of information about the programme; interviews with implementers and trainees; a focus group with trainees; inputs from national and regional networks, activists and references given by trainees; and an online survey of trainees. This article evaluates the lessons learnt and forms a set of recommendations to implement in the design of future editions of STEP-UP.     

Are HCAHPS Scores Higher for Private vs Double-Occupancy Inpatient Rooms in Total Joint Arthroplasty Patients?

Background

Private hospital rooms have a number of potential advantages compared to shared rooms, including reduced noise and increased control over the hospital environment. However, the association of room type with patient experience metrics in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) patients is currently unclear.

The Impact of Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Bundled Payment Program on Care Delivery

Background

Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) is a Medicare initiative to test the impact of holding a hospital accountable for services provided during an episode of care for a lower extremity joint arthroplasty on costs and quality. This study examines whether hospital participation in CJR is associated with having programs focused on improving posthospitalization care or reducing costs using a survey of orthopedic surgeons.

Mortality Rate and Mid-Term Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Dual Mobility Cups for the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures in a Middle Eastern Population

Background

The dual mobility cups (DMCs) were shown to reduce dislocation rate following total hip arthroplasty for any etiology, including femoral neck fractures. No reported studies evaluating DMC results for femoral neck fracture in a Middle Eastern population were found in the literature.

Role of Anatomical Patella Replacement on Anterior Knee Pain

Background

Anterior knee pain (AKP) remains a complex issue affecting patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty. Several radiographic parameters have been shown to be causative factors with various designs. The aim of this study is to evaluate the known radiographic parameters of AKP and clinical outcomes (ie, AKP) in the setting of a modern prosthesis with an anatomic patella button.

Liver Transplant From Controlled Cardiac Death Donors Using Normothermic Regional Perfusion: Comparison With Liver Transplants From Brain Dead Donors

Background

Liver transplantation from donors after either controlled or uncontrolled cardiac death (DCD) is associated with considerable rates of primary nonfunction (PNF) and ischemic cholangiopathy (IC). Normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) could significantly reduce such rates.

Long-Term Implications of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation

Background

Scientific guidelines consider atrial fibrillation (AF) complicating degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR) a debated indication for surgery.

Association Between Patient and Physician Sex and Physician-Estimated Stroke and Bleeding Risks in Atrial Fibrillation

Background

Physicians treating nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) assess stroke and bleeding risks when deciding on anticoagulation. The agreement between empirical and physician-estimated risks is unclear. Furthermore, the association between patient and physician sex and anticoagulation decision-making is uncertain.

Construct validity of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10)

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the construct validity of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) by determining its dimensionality, rating scale integrity, item-person match, precision and relationship with the degree of airway invasion and functional oral intake.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients’ EAT-10 scores. We used the Rasch rating scale model. We investigated correlations between the EAT-10 and scores on the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) and Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS).

Results: The median score of the EAT-10 from 127 patients was 16 of 40 (range 0–40). Confirmatory factor analysis supported unidimensionality. The 5-point rating scale categories met published criteria. Two items misfit the Rasch model and two other items displayed differential item functioning. Rasch person reliability was 0.79. Our patient cohort was divided into three person-strata. Correlations between the EAT-10 and the PAS and FOIS were weak to moderate in strength (respectively: r?=?0.26, p?=?0.0036; r?=??0.27, p?=?0.0027).

Conclusions: Our analyses identified deficits in the construct validity of the EAT-10 suggestive of a need to improve the EAT-10 to support its frequent use in clinical practice and research.

• Implications for Rehabilitation

• Swallowing disorders are associated with severe complications, such as pneumonia and malnutrition, and impose both social and psychological burdens on patients.

• The Eating Assessment Tool is a self-report instrument developed to estimate initial dysphagia severity and monitor change in patient-reported dysphagia symptoms as a response to treatment.

• This study shows that the Eating Assessment Tool has deficits in its construct validity and a need to improve the instrument to support its frequent use in clinical practice and research.