首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   479篇
  免费   40篇
  国内免费   3篇
耳鼻咽喉   16篇
儿科学   6篇
妇产科学   7篇
基础医学   147篇
口腔科学   21篇
临床医学   28篇
内科学   90篇
皮肤病学   10篇
神经病学   44篇
特种医学   5篇
外科学   46篇
综合类   3篇
预防医学   45篇
眼科学   2篇
药学   22篇
中国医学   1篇
肿瘤学   29篇
  2023年   4篇
  2022年   18篇
  2021年   17篇
  2020年   10篇
  2019年   15篇
  2018年   7篇
  2017年   6篇
  2016年   18篇
  2015年   13篇
  2014年   24篇
  2013年   19篇
  2012年   34篇
  2011年   46篇
  2010年   15篇
  2009年   19篇
  2008年   35篇
  2007年   23篇
  2006年   25篇
  2005年   24篇
  2004年   15篇
  2003年   16篇
  2002年   10篇
  2001年   12篇
  2000年   9篇
  1999年   11篇
  1998年   7篇
  1997年   6篇
  1996年   4篇
  1995年   5篇
  1994年   5篇
  1993年   2篇
  1992年   2篇
  1991年   4篇
  1990年   4篇
  1989年   8篇
  1987年   4篇
  1986年   2篇
  1985年   1篇
  1984年   2篇
  1981年   1篇
  1979年   1篇
  1975年   1篇
  1974年   2篇
  1973年   2篇
  1971年   2篇
  1969年   2篇
  1968年   3篇
  1967年   1篇
  1927年   4篇
  1924年   2篇
排序方式: 共有522条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
51.
Introduction: In comparison to their HIV-negative counterparts, people living with HIV (PLWH) have a higher prevalence of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in various anatomical sites coupled with increased HPV persistence, higher risk of HPV-related tumors, and faster disease progression.

Areas covered: Gender-neutral prevention strategies for HPV-related cancers in PLWH discussed: ABC approach, HPV vaccination, antiretroviral treatment (ART), anal cancer screening, and smoking cessation. Gender specific strategies: cervical cancer screening reduces the incidence and mortality of cervical cancer and circumcision might reduce the risk of HPV infections in men.

Expert commentary: HPV-related cancer incidence has not declined (e.g. cervical cancer) and has even increased (e.g. anal cancer) in the ART era, demanding an effective HPV prevention strategy. HPV vaccination should be introduced into national prevention programs worldwide immediately because current prophylactic vaccines are safe, tolerable, and immunogenic in PLWH. HPV vaccine efficacy trials in PLWH are essential to determine the most appropriate immunization schedule. The population most at risk of anal cancer is HIV-positive men who have sex with men, who are not protected by herd immunity if only the female population is vaccinated. Unvaccinated PLWH need enhanced surveillance for early detection of HPV-related cancers and their precursors.  相似文献   

52.
53.
A genotyping study of 285 Hybrid Capture 2 low-risk probe cocktail-positive specimens showed cross-reactivity with several untargeted human papillomavirus genotypes. Cross-reactivity was often clinically beneficial due to the detection of untargeted low-risk genotypes. A total of 8.4% of positive results, usually weak, were due to cross-reactivity with high-risk genotypes. Establishment of a gray zone is recommended.Low-risk alpha-human papillomaviruses (HPV) have never been at the fore in HPV research, due to their connection with benign neoplasm only. However, interest in these genotypes has increased substantially in recent years, due to the fact that quadrivalent HPV vaccine contains, in addition to a “cervical cancer component” (against HPV16 and HPV18), virus-like particles of the two most important low-risk alpha-HPV genotypes: HPV6 and HPV11. These two closely related HPV genotypes are the etiological agents of at least 90% of genital warts and laryngeal papillomas (1, 8, 10, 20) and at least 12.1% of cervical low-risk squamous intraepithelial lesions (5). In phase III clinical trials, this quadrivalent prophylactic HPV vaccine was shown to be highly effective against genital warts, e.g., reducing the burden of genital warts by 99% (95% confidence interval = 93.7 to 100%) among HPV-naïve vaccinated women aged 16 to 26 years (11). The quadrivalent HPV vaccine is currently licensed in more than 105 countries and has already been included in national vaccination programs in several countries. The widespread use of this vaccine has created an immediate need for a very specific detection tool for low-risk alpha-HPV.The Hybrid Capture 2 HPV DNA test (hc2), originally developed by Digene Corporation (Gaithersburg, MD) and currently marketed by Qiagen (Hilden, Germany), is the most widely used molecular method for the detection of a subset of clinically important HPV genotypes (14-16, 18). In this assay, exfoliated cells are first treated with alkali-denaturing reagent, and the processed samples are hybridized under high-stringency conditions with two mixtures of unlabeled full-genomic-length RNA probes, one specific for 13 high-risk HPV genotypes (HPV16, HPV18, HPV31, HPV33, HPV35, HPV39, HPV45, HPV51, HPV52, HPV56, HPV58, HPV59, and HPV68) and one for 5 low-risk HPV genotypes (HPV6, HPV11, HPV42, HPV43, and HPV44). Positive specimens are detected by binding the hybridization complexes onto the surface of a microplate well coated with monoclonal antibodies specific to RNA-DNA hybrids. Immobilized hybrids are detected by the addition of an alkaline phosphatase-conjugated antibody to RNA-DNA hybrids, followed by the addition of a chemiluminiscent substrate. The emission of light is measured as relative light units (RLU) in a luminometer. Thus, hc2 does not allow the exact determination of HPV genotype(s) present in a clinical specimen but rather expresses the results of tested high-risk or low-risk HPV genotypes as positive or negative. The hc2 high-risk cocktail is very reliable for the routine detection of clinically important HPV infection and is, at present, the only commercially available HPV DNA assay with sufficient scientific data to support its performance in a clinical setting. However, several studies have shown significant analytical inaccuracy of the high-risk cocktail, mainly due to cross-reactivity with several untargeted HPV genotypes (2-4, 6, 9, 16, 19, 21-26, 27). This phenomenon certainly reduces the analytical specificity of the high-risk cocktail, but cross-reactivity with some HPV genotypes has proven to be clinically beneficial (4, 19).The U.S. version of hc2, containing the high-risk probe cocktail only, is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for triage (in cases of equivocal cytology results showing the presence of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance) to determine which patients should be referred to physicians for a colposcopy and as a screening test for use in addition to cytology screening for women 30 years of age and older (15). Although the use of the hc2 low-risk probe cocktail is not recommended in the U.S. due to lack of FDA approval, the “Conformité Européene” (CE)-certified version of hc2, containing both high-risk and low-risk probe cocktails, is currently used in at least 40% of laboratories outside the U.S., mainly for individuals with clinically suspected low-risk HPV infection or as a reflex test for women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance who tested negative for high-risk HPVs. In contrast to the established cross-reactivity of the high-risk probe cocktail with several untargeted HPV genotypes, the specificity of the hc2 low-risk cocktail has never been studied in detail. According to the data presented in the hc2 package insert, the only recognized cross-reactivity of the hc2 low-risk cocktail is with HPV13, a genotype commonly detected in lip lesions of certain ethnic groups but never in anogenital lesions (17). In the present study, therefore, we have for the first time systematically examined the analytical specificity of the hc2 low-risk cocktail by determining the exact HPV genotype(s) present in 285 consecutive samples recognized using the hc2 low-risk probe cocktail as HPV DNA positive.To determine the specificity and accuracy of hc2 in the detection of the five HPV genotypes (HPV6, HPV11, HPV42, HPV43, and HPV44) included in the low-risk probe cocktail, 285 consecutive cervical specimens obtained from the same number of women and recognized as HPV positive using the hc2 low-risk probe cocktail were included in the study. Fifty-six out of 285 samples were positive using both low-risk and high-risk probe cocktails. The specimens included in the study were collected between June 2007 and May 2008, using a DNAPaP cervical sampler and specimen transport medium (STM; Digene Corporation, Gaithersburg, MD), from Croatian and Slovenian women undergoing routine gynecological examination. hc2 testing was performed not later than 5 days after the collection of specimens, strictly following the manufacturer''s instructions. According to the manufacturer''s interpretation criteria, the specimens with a RLU-per-cutoff (RLU/CO) value higher than 1.0 were considered positive for one or more low-risk HPV genotypes included in the cocktail, and the specimens with a RLU/CO value of <1.0 were considered negative for the five low-risk HPV genotypes tested.The presence of the five targeted low-risk genotypes, as well as other, untargeted low-risk and high-risk HPV genotypes, in the hc2 low-risk cocktail-positive samples was determined by using seven different PCR-based genotyping methods. To keep the number of tests to a minimum, the seven methods were used consecutively, e.g., if the first genotyping method reliably detected at least one of the five targeted HPV genotypes in the particular hc2 low-risk cocktail-positive sample, this sample was excluded from further testing. All seven genotyping tests were performed on the same sample used for hc2 testing, i.e., 500 μl of STM was removed before the addition of hc2 denaturing reagent solution (first step of hc2 testing) and kept at −70°C until genotyping. After the isolation of DNA from 200 μl of nondenatured STM using a QIAamp DNA mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), all 285 samples were first tested using a recently developed real-time PCR (RT-PCR) assay that allows very specific detection and reliable differentiation of HPV6 and HPV11 (13). The sensitivity of the test, assessed by probit analysis at a 95% detection level, is 42.9, 43.4, and 25.3 DNA copies per assay for prototypic and nonprototypic HPV6 variants and HPV11, respectively (13). Sixty-six samples were found to be positive for HPV6, and 6 samples contained HPV11 (Table (Table1).1). The remaining 213 samples were then tested using HPV42 genotype-specific RT-PCR, and 105 were found to contain this low-risk HPV. The remaining 108 samples were then tested using HPV43 genotype-specific RT-PCR, followed by testing of all negative samples using HPV44/55 genotype-specific RT-PCR. By using the two RT-PCR tests, the presence of HPV43 and HPV44/55 was identified in 8 and 17 samples, respectively (Table (Table1).1). The HPV42, HPV43, and HPV44/55 genotype-specific primers and probes were designed according to the L1 long control region genomic sequences of the prototype isolates (GenBank accession nos. M73236, AJ620205, U31788, and U31791, respectively). As shown in Table Table2,2, two primers and two hybridization (fluorescent resonance energy transfer) probes were selected for each HPV genotype studied. A common probe was designed for HPV44 and HPV55, which has recently been recognized as a subtype of HPV44 and is no longer considered a separate genotype (7). A BLAST search of the GenBank nr database was performed for each sequence in order to verify HPV genotype specificity. The assays were set up on a LightCycler 2.0 real-time system (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) and performed using a QuantiTect probe PCR kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer''s instructions.

TABLE 1.

Summary of genotyping results of 285 consecutive samples recognized as HPV DNA positive using the hc2 low-risk probe cocktail
HPV genotype detectedNo. of positive samplesDetection method(s)Interpretation
HPV666HPV6/-11-specific RT-PCR (13)Targeted HPV genotype
HPV116HPV6/-11-specific RT-PCR (13)Targeted HPV genotype
HPV42105HPV42-specific RT-PCRTargeted HPV genotype
HP438HPV43-specific RT-PCRTargeted HPV genotype
HP44/5517HPV44/55-specific RT-PCRTargeted HPV genotype
HPV404INNO-LiPA HPV testUntargeted low-risk alpha-HPV genotype related to HPV43 (species 8), analytically incorrect but clinically beneficial
HPV7413INNO-LiPA HPV testUntargeted low-risk alpha-HPV genotype related to HPV6 and HPV11 (species 10), analytically incorrect but clinically beneficial
candHPV919Sequencing of GP5+/GP6+ PCR productsUntargeted low-risk alpha-HPV genotype, related to HPV43 (species 8), analytically incorrect but clinically beneficial
HPV612Linear array HPV testUntargeted low-risk alpha-HPV genotype (species 3), analytically incorrect but clinically beneficial
HPV701INNO-LiPA HPV testUntargeted low-risk alpha-HPV genotype (species 7), analytically incorrect but clinically beneficial
candHPV871Sequencing of GP5+/GP6+ PCR productsUntargeted low-risk alpha-HPV genotype (species 3), analytically incorrect but clinically beneficial
candHPV892Linear array HPV testUntargeted low-risk alpha-HPV genotype (species 3), analytically incorrect but clinically beneficial
candHPV904Sequencing of GP5+/GP6+ PCR productsUntargeted low-risk alpha-HPV genotype (species 14), analytically incorrect but clinically beneficial
HPV165INNO-LiPA HPV test and linear array HPV testUntargeted high-risk alpha-HPV genotype
HPV183INNO-LiPA HPV test and linear array HPV testUntargeted high-risk alpha-HPV genotype
HPV312INNO-LiPA HPV test and linear array HPV testUntargeted high-risk alpha-HPV genotype
HPV451INNO-LiPA HPV test and linear array HPV testUntargeted high-risk alpha-HPV genotype
HPV521INNO-LiPA HPV test and linear array HPV testUntargeted high-risk alpha-HPV genotype
HPV591INNO-LiPA HPV test and linear array HPV testUntargeted high-risk alpha-HPV genotype
HPV682INNO-LiPA HPV test and linear array HPV testUntargeted high-risk alpha-HPV genotype
HPV51, HPV53, HPV56, HPV58, HPV66, HPV739INNO-LiPA HPV test and linear array HPV testUntargeted high-risk or probably high-risk alpha-HPV genotypes found only in combination with
    other high-risk genotypes
HPV negative23All seven genotyping methods
Open in a separate window

TABLE 2.

Sequences of the primers and probes used in genotype-specific RT-PCRs designed to detect HPV42, HPV43, and HPV44/55
HPV genotypePrimer/probeaSequence (5′-3′)bNucleotide positionc
HPV4242FGGTGACTGCCCACCATTAGA(s)6374-6393
42RCCTCAGCAGACATTTTTAAGTAATCA(a)6548-6523
42FLAGTTTTATTCAGGATGGGGATATGGTGG-FL(s)6404-6431
42LCLC610-TGTAGGGTTTGGGGCACTAGATTTTGG(s)6433-6459
HPV4343FAACTTACCCAGTTTCCCTTAGG(s)7126-7147
43RACAACCCATACAGGTACAAAACA(a)7303-7281
43FLAACTGTAAAGCGTTCTGCACCATCC-FL(s)7196-7220
43LCLC640-CCTCTACGTCTGCCCCTGCCT(s)7222-7242
HPV44/5544/55FGGCCTAGTGAAAACCAGGTATATG(s)5701-5724
44/55RAGTGTCTTGTTTGCTGGTCGT(a)5866-5846
44/55FLCTCCCGCCCCAGTATCCAAAG-FL(s)5731-5751
44/55LCLC705-AATAMCTACGGATGCCTATGTCAAACGCAC(s)5753-5782
Open in a separate windowaHPV genotype-specific forward (F) and reverse (R) primers and hybridization probes (FL and LC; see footnote b) are indicated.bFL, fluorescein; LC610, LC640, and LC705, LightCycler red dyes; M, A or C; (s), sense orientation; (a), antisense orientation.cNumbered according to the genomes of HPV42, HPV43, and HPV44 prototype isolates (GenBank accession nos. M73236, AJ620205, and U31788).As summarized in Table Table1,1, the presence of at least one targeted HPV genotype was detected in 202 (70.9%) of 285 samples recognized as HPV DNA positive using the hc2 low-risk probe cocktail. The remaining 83 HPV6-, HPV11-, HPV42-, HPV43-, HPV44-, and HPV55-negative samples were then tested using the commercially available INNO-LiPA HPV genotyping Extra test (Innogenetics, Gent, Belgium), capable of recognizing 27 different alpha-HPV genotypes (including HPV6, HPV11, HPV43, and HPV44), following the manufacturer''s instructions. All remaining HPV-negative samples were additionally tested using the commercially available Linear Array HPV genotyping test (Roche Diagnostics), capable of recognizing 37 different alpha-HPV genotypes (including HPV6, HPV11, and HPV42), following the manufacturer''s instructions. Finally, all remaining HPV-negative samples were tested using an in-house GP5+/GP6+ PCR targeting a 150-bp fragment of the L1 gene (12). HPV genotypes were determined by sequencing the GP5+/GP6+ PCR products. By using three additional genotyping methods, the presence of untargeted but low-risk alpha-HPV genotypes phylogenetically related (HPV40, HPV74, and candHPV91) or phylogenetically unrelated (HPV61, HPV70, candHPV87, candHPV89, and candHPV90) to targeted genotypes were detected in a total of 26 and 10 samples, respectively. The detection of these eight untargeted low-risk alpha-HPV genotypes was interpreted as analytically incorrect but clinically beneficial. As summarized in Table Table1,1, the presence of at least one targeted or untargeted low-risk HPV genotype was detected in 238 (83.5%) of 285 samples recognized as HPV DNA positive using the hc2 low-risk probe cocktail. The RLU/CO values measured in these samples ranged between 1.1 and 3,095.7 RLU/CO (median, 17.24 RLU/CO).In 24 (8.4%) of 285 samples recognized as HPV positive using the hc2 low-risk probe cocktail, only high-risk or probable high-risk HPV genotypes but no targeted or untargeted low-risk genotypes were detected (Table (Table1).1). The unexpected genotyping results were confirmed in all 24 samples, using both the INNO-LiPA HPV genotyping Extra test and the Linear Array HPV genotyping test. Infection with a single high-risk genotype only was thus detected in 15 samples, and 9 samples contained two or more high-risk or probable high-risk HPV genotypes but no targeted or untargeted low-risk genotypes (Table (Table1).1). Seven different high-risk alpha-HPV genotypes (HPV16, HPV18, HPV31, HPV45, HPV52, HPV59, and HPV68) were detected as single pathogens and thus interpreted as hc2 low-risk probe cocktail cross-reactive genotypes. Six different high-risk or probable high-risk alpha-HPV genotypes (HPV51, HPV53, HPV56, HPV58, HPV66, and HPV73) were detected only in samples with other high-risk alpha-HPV genotypes and thus interpreted as possible cross-reactive genotypes. As shown in Fig. Fig.1,1, weak RLU/CO values (below 6 RLU/CO) were observed in the majority of cross-reactive samples. RLU/CO values ranged between 1.1 and 255.6 RLU/CO (median, 2.4). For all 24 cross-reactive samples, the results of testing with hc2 high-risk cocktail were also available. As expected from our genotyping results, all 24 samples clearly tested hc2 high-risk positive, with high-risk RLU/CO values ranging between 21.4 and 3,053.9 (median, 254.1). Thus, similar to what was proposed for the hc2 high-risk probe cocktail (4, 19), the most probable reason for the false-positive hc2 low-risk probe cocktail results, recognized in 24 samples containing high-risk or probable high-risk HPV genotypes only, is the cross-reactivity of long low-risk RNA probes with high-risk HPV DNA present in high concentration in these samples.Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.The relationship between the proportion of hc2 false reactivity and hc2 RLU/CO values. The light gray part of each bar represents the percentage of hc2 false-positive results due to the absence of HPV DNA, the dark gray part the percentage of hc2 false-positive results due to cross-reactivity with untargeted high-risk HPV genotypes, and the white part the percentage of hc2 true-positive results.Finally, in 23 (8.0%) of 285 samples recognized as HPV positive using the hc2 low-risk probe cocktail, no HPV DNA was detected using all seven genotyping methods (Table (Table1).1). Focusing on five hc2-targeted HPV genotypes, the presence of HPV6 and HPV11 was excluded using four different and very sensitive PCR-based methods and the presence of HPV42, HPV43, and HPV44 using three different PCR-based methods each. In addition, all 23 samples tested positive using primers KM29/RS42 targeting 536 bp of the ubiquitous human beta-globin gene (12), indicating an adequate quality of DNA and the absence of PCR inhibitors. As shown in Fig. Fig.1,1, low-risk hc2 RLU/CO values measured in these samples were weak and ranged between 1.1 and 5.6 RLU/CO (median, 2.1). In addition to weak hc2 low-risk probe cocktail positivity, in 15 of 23 samples, weak hc2 high-risk probe cocktail positivity was also found, ranging between 1.4 and 7.7 RLU/CO (median, 4.3). Another eight samples tested hc2 high-risk probe cocktail negative. Although the possibility remains of the presence in the tested samples of HPV genotypes not covered by the seven genotyping methods but recognized by hc2 due to cross-reactivity with untargeted genotypes, this seems highly unlikely. Due to weak hc2 signals in these specimens and the recently published observation that in at least 4.8% of hc2 high-risk probe cocktail-positive samples, no HPV could be identified using two very sensitive PCR assays (4), we strongly believe that in the 23 hc2 low-risk probe cocktail-positive samples in which no HPV DNA was detected using all seven genotyping methods, no HPV DNA is present or it is present in clinically irrelevant quantities.In conclusion, in the present genotyping study, which was performed on 285 hc2 low-risk HPV-positive cervical specimens, we found that the hc2 low-risk probe cocktail, similarly to the hc2 high-risk cocktail, cross-reacts with several untargeted HPV genotypes. The broader-than-assigned HPV genotype detection range of the hc2 low-risk probe cocktail is clinically beneficial in the majority of cases, due to the detection of phylogenetically related and unrelated low-risk HPV genotypes. However, 8.4% of all hc2 low-risk probe cocktail-positive results, usually with weak signal strength, were due to cross-reactivity with untargeted high-risk genotypes. We thus suggest a more cautious interpretation of all samples with weak low-risk hc2 signal strength until the clinical consequences of cross-reactivity are finally determined. On the basis of our results, and similar to a recent proposal for the high-risk probe cocktail (24), we suggest the following strategy. If a tested sample has an hc2 low-risk RLU/CO value of less than 6 and, at the same time, an hc2 high-risk RLU/CO value above 20, a high possibility of cross-reactivity with untargeted high-risk genotypes should be considered. If a tested sample has an hc2 low-risk RLU/CO value of less than 6 and, at the same time, a weak hc2 high-risk RLU/CO value or if it is hc2 high-risk negative, a high possibility of HPV DNA false positivity due to unresolved reasons should be considered.  相似文献   
54.
55.
56.
BackgroundTo assess potential associations between the ankle-brachial blood pressure index (ABI) and ocular disorders.MethodsIn the population-based cross-sectional Russian Ural Eye and Medical Study including 5,899 (80.5%) out of 7328 eligible participants aged 40+ years, the participants underwent a series of ocular and medical examinations including measurement of ABI.ResultsBlood pressure measurements of both arms and ankles were available for 3187 (54.0%) individuals. The mean ABI was 1.26 ± 0.19 (median:1.20; range: 0.61, 2.20). In multivariate analysis, a higher ABI was associated with younger age (P < 0.001; non-standardized regression coefficient B: −0.001; 95% confidence interval (CI): −0.002, −0.001), female sex (P < 0.001; B: 0.03; 95% CI: 0.02, 0.04), lower body mass index (P < 0.001; B: −0.004; 95% CI: −0.006, −0.003), lower waist-to-hip ratio (P = 0.01; B: −0.10; 95% CI: −0.17, −0.02), lower glucose serum concentration (P = 0.008; B: −0.005; 95% CI: −0.009, −0.001), lower prevalence of arterial hypertension (P < 0.001; B: −0.14; 95% CI: −0.16, −0.12), higher mean systolic blood pressure (P < 0.001; B: 0.003; 95% CI: 0.002, 0.003), and higher prevalence of any alcohol consumption (P < 0.001; B: 0.03; 95% CI: 0.02, 0.04). In that multivariate model, prevalence of glaucoma (P = 0.67) as a whole, open-angle glaucoma (P = 0.86) and angle-closure glaucoma (P = 0.54), stage of glaucomatous optic neuropathy (P = 0.57), prevalence of age-related macular degeneration (P = 0.88), prevalence and stage of diabetic retinopathy (P = 0.30, and P = 0.29, respectively), nuclear cataract (P = 0.32, and P = 0.41, resp.), cortical cataract (P = 0.33, and P = 0.92, resp.), subcapsular cataract (P = 0.74 and P = 0.60, resp.), and pseudoexfoliation (P = 0.44 and P = 0.47, resp.), intraocular pressure (P = 0.52), axial length (P = 0.20), and peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer thickness (P = 0.55) were not significantly associated with the ABI.ConclusionsIn this ethnically mixed population from Russia, none of the major ocular diseases was associated with ABI suggesting that subclinical atherosclerosis is not markedly associated with the aetiology of these ocular disorders.Subject terms: Retinal diseases, Lens diseases  相似文献   
57.
58.
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a well-known autoimmune chronic inflammatory disease, which can virtually affect any organ system in the body. Although hemolytic anemia has been known to occur in < 10% of SLE patients, they are usually mediated through warm antibodies. It is extremely rare to see cold antibody-mediated hemolytic anemia in SLE, and only few cases have been reported in literature to our knowledge. This is a unique case report of SLE associated with cold agglutinin hemolytic anemia in a patient presented with generalized tender lymphadenopathy and typical B-symptoms including fever, night sweats, and significant weight loss.  相似文献   
59.
Background: Genotyping for the most carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) types (HPV16/HPV18) can identify high risk of underlying cervical precancer and guide further management.

Research design and methods: A pooled analysis was performed of the clinical accuracy of high-risk HPV (hrHPV) testing and HPV16/18 genotyping in triage of women with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL). Data regarding 24 assays evaluated in four VALGENT validation panels were used.

Results: In women with LSIL, hrHPV had a pooled sensitivity for CIN2+ of 95.5% (95% CI: 91.0–97.8%) and a specificity of 25.3% (95% CI: 22.2–28.6%). HPV16/18 genotyping had a sensitivity and specificity for CIN2+ of 52.9% (95% CI: 48.4–57.4%) and 83.5% (95% CI: 79.9–86.5%), respectively. The average risk of CIN2+ was 46.1% when HPV16/18-positive, 15.5% in women who were HPV16/18-negative but positive for other hrHPV types and 4.3% for hrHPV-negative women.

Conclusions: Triage of women with LSIL with HPV16/18 genotyping increases the positive predictive value compared to hrHPV testing but at the expense of lower sensitivity. Arguably, women testing positive for HPV16/18 need further clinical work-up. Whether colposcopy referral or further surveillance is recommended for women with other hrHPV types may depend on the post-test risk of precancer and the local risk-based decision thresholds.  相似文献   

60.
Graphene has attracted a lot of interest as a potential replacement for silicon in future integrated circuits due to its remarkable electronic and transport properties. In order to meet technology requirements for an acceptable bandgap, graphene needs to be patterned into graphene nanoribbons (GNRs), while one-dimensional (1D) edge metal contacts (MCs) are needed to allow for the encapsulation and preservation of the transport properties. While the properties of GNRs with ideal contacts have been studied extensively, little is known about the electronic and transport properties of GNRs with 1D edge MCs, including contact resistance (RC), which is one of the key device parameters. In this work, we employ atomistic quantum transport simulations of GNRs with MCs modeled with the wide-band limit (WBL) approach to explore their metallization effects and contact resistance. By studying density of states (DOS), transmission and conductance, we find that metallization decreases transmission and conductance, and either enlarges or diminishes the transport gap depending on GNR dimensions. We calculate the intrinsic quantum limit of width-normalized RC and find that the limit depends on GNR dimensions, decreasing with width downscaling to ~21 Ω∙µm in 0.4 nm-wide GNRs, and increasing with length downscaling up to ~196 Ω∙µm in 5 nm-long GNRs. We demonstrate that 1D edge contacts and size engineering can be used to tune the RC in GNRs to values lower than those of graphene.  相似文献   
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号