False‐positive Extra‐Mammary Findings in Breast MRI: Another Cause for Concern

Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been repeatedly shown to have a high false‐positive rate for additional findings in the breast resulting in additional breast imaging and biopsies. We hypothesize that breast MRI is also associated with a high rate of false‐positive findings outside of the breast requiring additional evaluation, interventions, and delays in treatment. We performed a retrospective review of all breast MRIs performed on breast cancer patients in 2010 at a single institution. MRI reports were analyzed for extra‐mammary findings. The timing and yield of the additional procedures was also analyzed. Three hundred and twenty‐seven breast cancer patients (average age = 53.53 ± 11.08 years) had a breast MRI. Incidental, extra‐mammary findings were reported in 35/327 patients (10.7%) with a total of 38 incidental findings. The extra‐mammary findings were located in the liver (n = 21, 60.0%), thoracic cavity (n = 12, 34.3%), kidneys (n = 1, 2.9%), musculoskeletal system (n = 3, 8.6%), and neck (n = 1, 2.9%). Eighteen of the 35 patients (51.4%) received additional radiographic imaging, 3 (8.6%) received additional laboratory testing, 2 (5.7%) received additional physician referrals and 2 (5.7%) received a biopsy of the finding. The average time to additional procedures in these patients was 14.5 days. None of the incidental, extra‐mammary findings were associated with breast cancer or other malignancy. Breast MRI was associated with a high rate (10.7%) of extra‐mammary findings, which led to costly additional imaging studies, referrals, and tests. These findings were not associated with breast cancer or other malignancies. Extra‐mammary findings highlight an unrecognized adverse consequence of breast MRI.     

The Dilemma of Breast Cancer Treatment and Existing Collagen Vascular Disease: A Case of Scleroderma and Review of the Literature

Collagen vascular diseases present a treatment dilemma for patients with breast cancer. Due to the potential for severe, acute, and late complications of radiation therapy, a history of collagen vascular disease (CVD) is a relative contraindication to breast‐conserving treatment. We present a case of early stage breast cancer in a patient with severe scleroderma treated with breast‐conserving surgery without radiation and a brief review of the published literature regarding the therapeutic approach to the patient with CVD and breast cancer.     

Defining a new diagnostic assessment parameter for wound care: Elevated protease activity,an indicator of nonhealing,for targeted protease‐modulating treatment

It is widely accepted that elevated protease activity (EPA) in chronic wounds impedes healing. However, little progress has occurred in quantifying the level of protease activity that is detrimental for healing. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between inflammatory protease activity and wound healing status, and to establish the level of EPA above which human neutrophil‐derived elastase (HNE) and matrix metalloproteases (MMP) activities correlate with nonhealing wounds. Chronic wound swab samples (n = 290) were collected from four wound centers across the USA to measure HNE and MMP activity. Healing status was determined according to percentage reduction in wound area over the previous 2–4 weeks; this was available for 211 wounds. Association between protease activity and nonhealing wounds was determined by receiver operating characteristic analysis (ROC), a statistical technique used for visualizing and analyzing the performance of diagnostic tests. ROC analysis showed that area under the curve (AUC) for HNE were 0.69 for all wounds and 0.78 for wounds with the most reliable wound trajectory information, respectively. For MMP, the corresponding AUC values were 0.70 and 0.82. Analysis suggested that chronic wounds having values of HNE >5 and/or MMP ≥13, should be considered wound healing impaired. EPA is indicative of nonhealing wounds. Use of a diagnostic test to detect EPA in clinical practice could enable clinicians to identify wounds that are nonhealing, thus enabling targeted treatment with protease modulating therapies.     

Radiographic changes induced after cervical facet radiofrequency denervation

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Paraspinal infections after zygapophyseal (facet) radiofrequency denervation (RFD) are a serious but rare complication of this procedure. We are aware of only one case report of an epidural abscess after facet joint injection. PURPOSE: To report post-procedure inflammatory changes after cervical facet RFD. STUDY DESIGN: Case report. PATIENT SAMPLE: A 35-year-old Caucasian female. METHODS: Retrospective case review. RESULTS: The patient underwent cervical RFD and was admitted to the hospital 7 days after her procedure with severe neck pain. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with contrast revealed what appeared to be evidence of a paraspinal muscle abscess although blood tests were negative. She was treated with antibiotic therapy, yet she never developed systemic signs of infection. A follow-up MRI without contrast revealed no evidence of infection, and she was discharged home on hospital day 6. At her first follow-up visit, she was still experiencing scalp pain and paraspinal muscle spasm. During subsequent follow-up visits, she has continued to improve clinically without experiencing signs of infection. Another follow-up MRI 6 weeks after her discharge home revealed persistent minimal left paraspinal enhancement at C2-3, possibly representing post-procedure granulation tissue with no evidence of abscess. CONCLUSIONS: Post-procedural MRI findings after radiofrequency lesioning can resemble radiographic findings associated with a paraspinal abscess. Patients with radiographic findings consistent with abscess should only be treated if clinical signs or symptoms of systemic infection are present.     

Safety and Efficacy of Reteplase for the Treatment of Acute Arterial Occlusion: Complexity of Underlying Lesion Predicts Outcome

We evaluated both the safety and efficacy of reteplase for treatment of acute arterial occlusion as well as outcomes based on treatment of the underlying lesion. From November 2000 to February 2004, reteplase was used to treat arterial occlusions in 81 patients. Catheter-directed intrathrombus thrombolysis was performed with reteplase (0.5 units/hr) continuous infusion. Percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (Angiojet) was performed in 61% (n = 50) of patients prior to thrombolysis. Unmasking of significant lesions resulted in endovascular intervention (39.5%), open surgical repair (24.6%), or both endovascular and surgical repair (9.8%) of the lesion. No lesion was found in 25.9% of patients. Major and minor complication rates as well as restoration of patency, limb salvage, and amputation-free survival were evaluated. Eighty-one patients received reteplase therapy (median = 10.3 +/- 5.3 units, 19.5 +/- 7.4 hr) followed by next-day arteriogram to assess thrombus removal. Technical success was achieved in 96.2% (n = 78) of cases. Kaplan-Meier life table analysis revealed overall primary patency rates of 76.3%, 60.1%, and 51.6%, at 1, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Overall amputation-free survival rates were 86.4%, 76.4%, and 69.7% at 1, 6, and 12 months, respectively. When subdivided into postlysis intervention, the lysis-only group achieved increased patency (p = 0.0143) and increased limb salvage (p = 0.0219) at 1 year compared to the lysis and endovascular intervention and the lysis and surgical groups. The 30-day complication rate was 17.3% (n = 14), with a major complication rate of 4.9% (n = 4) and a minor complication rate of 12.3% (n = 10). There were no intracranial hemorrhagic complications. Intra-arterial catheter-directed infusion of reteplase for acute lower extremity ischemia is safe and efficacious, as shown by the low risk of bleeding complications, high limb salvage rates, and low mortality rates in this study. The complexity of the lesion that is unmasked through thrombolytic therapy is a predictor of patency and limb salvage.     

Unilateral groin surgery in children: will the addition of an ultrasound‐guided ilioinguinal nerve block enhance the duration of analgesia of a single‐shot caudal block?

Background: Inguinal hernia repair, hydrocelectomy, and orchidopexy are commonly performed surgical procedures in children. Postoperative pain control is usually provided with a single‐shot caudal block. Blockade of the ilioinguinal nerve may lead to additional analgesia. The aim of this double‐blind, randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the efficacy of an adjuvant blockade of the ilioinguinal nerve using ultrasound (US) guidance at the end of the procedure with local anesthetic vs normal saline and to explore the potential for prolongation of analgesia with decreased need for postoperative pain medication. Methods: Fifty children ages 1–6 years scheduled for unilateral inguinal hernia repair, hydrocelectomy, orchidopexy, or orchiectomy were prospectively randomized into one of two groups: Group S that received an US‐guided ilioinguinal nerve block with 0.1 ml·kg^?1 of preservative‐free normal saline and Group B that received an US‐guided nerve block with 0.1 ml·kg^?1 of 0.25% bupivacaine with 1 : 200 000 epinephrine at the conclusion of the surgery. After induction of anesthesia but prior to surgical incision, all patients received caudal anesthesia with 0.7 ml·kg^?1 of 0.125% bupivacaine with 1 : 200 000 epinephrine. Patients were observed by a blinded observer for (i) pain scores using the Children and Infants Postoperative Pain Scale, (ii) need for rescue medication in the PACU, (iii) need for oral pain medications given by the parents at home. Results: Forty‐eight patients, consisting of 46 males and two females, with a mean age of 3.98 (sd ± 1.88) were enrolled in the study. Two patients were excluded from the study because of study protocol violation and/or alteration in surgical procedure. The average pain scores reported for the entire duration spent in the recovery room for the caudal and caudal/ilioinguinal block groups were 1.92 (sd ± 1.59) and 1.18 (sd ± 1.31), respectively. The average pain score difference was 0.72 (sd ± 0.58) and was statistically significant (P < 0.05). In addition, when examined by procedure type, it was found that the difference in the average pain scores between the caudal and caudal/ilioinguinal block groups was statistically significant for the inguinal hernia repair patients (P < 0.05) but not for the other groin surgery patients (P = 0.13). For all groin surgery patients, six of the 23 patients in the caudal group and eight of the 25 patients in the caudal/ilioinguinal block group required pain rescue medications throughout their entire hospital stay or at home (P = 0.76). Overall, the caudal group received an average of 0.54 (sd ± 1.14) pain rescue medication doses, while the caudal/ilioinguinal block group received an average of 0.77 (sd ± 1.70) pain rescue medication doses; this was, however, not statistically significant (P = 0.58). Conclusions: The addition of an US‐guided ilioinguinal nerve block to a single‐shot caudal block decreases the severity of pain experienced by pediatric groin surgery patients. The decrease in pain scores were particularly pronounced in inguinal hernia repair patients.     

A randomized trial comparing sevoflurane and propofol in children undergoing MRI scans

Objectives:  We compared three primary outcomes of pausing the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan, emergence quality and respiratory complications.
Aim:  To measure and compare the quality between sevoflurane and propofol in children undergoing MRI scans.
Background:  No randomized controlled trial exists comparing the quality between sevoflurane and propofol for MRI.
Methods/Materials:  Two hundred unpremedicated children (18 months to 7 years) scheduled for brain MRI scans were recruited. After induction with sevoflurane, children were randomized to receive sevoflurane [general anesthesia with sevoflurane (GAS)] via laryngeal mask airway (LMA) or propofol [general anesthesia with propofol (GAP)] bolus and infusion for their scan. The three primary outcomes of pausing the MRI scan (P), agitation (A), and respiratory complications (R) were compared. Timeliness of care was also measured.
Results:  No MRI scan pauses were found in 92% and 80% in the GAS and GAP groups. The median and interquartile A scores were 3 (0, 7) in GAS and 0 (0, 4) in GAP groups respectively. There was no difference in respiratory complications between GAS and GAP ( P  = 0.62). The median and interquartile postanesthesia care unit (PACU) times were 25 (18, 34) for GAS and 31 (25, 44) for GAP ( P  = 0.0001). The median and interquartile total times were 78 (69, 90) for GAS and 88 (78, 100) for GAP ( P  = 0.0002).
Conclusion:  Our study compared the three primary outcomes of pausing, agitation, and respiratory complications between the two groups, and we found no difference in respiratory complications. However, the GAP group had more pausing and less agitation than the GAS group.     

Quality of recovery from two types of general anesthesia for ambulatory dental surgery in children: a double-blind, randomized trial

Background:  Pediatric dental procedures are increasingly performed under general anesthesia because of the inability to cooperate, situational anxiety, or other behavioral problems. Volatile anesthetics have been associated with emergence delirium in children, whereas the use of propofol for anesthetic maintenance has been shown to reduce the incidence of emergence delirium after other types of surgeries. The aim of this study is to compare a sevoflurane-based anesthetic with a propofol-based technique as it relates to the incidence of emergence delirium and the quality of recovery after pediatric dental surgery, in patients who present with risk factors for perioperative behavioral issues.
Methods:  We prospectively collected data of 179 pediatric patients scheduled for ambulatory dental surgery using a double-blind and randomized trial design. Subjects were anesthetized following standardized protocols for either a sevoflurane- or a propofol-based technique. The incidence of emergency delirium, as measured by the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium score, was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), number of nursing interventions in the recovery room, time to discharge readiness, and parental satisfaction.
Results:  We found no difference in the incidence of emergence delirium after both types of anesthesia. However, use of sevoflurane significantly increased both the risk of PONV and the number of postoperative nursing interventions. Discharge criteria were met about 10 min earlier in patients anesthetized with sevoflurane. Parental satisfaction was equally high with both anesthesia regimens.
Conclusions:  A propofol-based anesthetic technique did not lead to a lower incidence of emergence delirium after dental surgery in children but did result in significantly less PONV and fewer postoperative nursing interventions.