It is well known that high hydrostatic pressures can induce the unfolding of proteins. The physical underpinnings of this phenomenon have been investigated extensively but remain controversial. Changes in solvation energetics have been commonly proposed as a driving force for pressure-induced unfolding. Recently, the elimination of void volumes in the native folded state has been argued to be the principal determinant. Here we use the cavity-containing L99A mutant of T
4 lysozyme to examine the pressure-induced destabilization of this multidomain protein by using solution NMR spectroscopy. The cavity-containing C-terminal domain completely unfolds at moderate pressures, whereas the N-terminal domain remains largely structured to pressures as high as 2.5 kbar. The sensitivity to pressure is suppressed by the binding of benzene to the hydrophobic cavity. These results contrast to the pseudo-WT protein, which has a residual cavity volume very similar to that of the L99A–benzene complex but shows extensive subglobal reorganizations with pressure. Encapsulation of the L99A mutant in the aqueous nanoscale core of a reverse micelle is used to examine the hydration of the hydrophobic cavity. The confined space effect of encapsulation suppresses the pressure-induced unfolding transition and allows observation of the filling of the cavity with water at elevated pressures. This indicates that hydration of the hydrophobic cavity is more energetically unfavorable than global unfolding. Overall, these observations point to a range of cooperativity and energetics within the T
4 lysozyme molecule and illuminate the fact that small changes in physical parameters can significantly alter the pressure sensitivity of proteins.The destabilization of proteins by pressure is a fundamental and highly informative probe of their structural free energy landscape but remains inadequately understood (
1). The underlying determinants of pressure-induced unfolding have recently been a subject of several detailed investigations (
2–
10). Fundamentally, pressure-induced unfolding of proteins results from the population of nonnative conformations having a lower total system volume than the native structure seen at ambient pressure. Various mechanisms for pressure-induced unfolding have been proposed including changes in water structure that weaken the hydrophobic effect at high pressure (
11,
12), increases in solvent density at the protein surface that contribute to a reduction in the total volume of the protein–water system (
13,
14), and the elimination of cavities in the protein interior through exposure to solvent (
3). With the development of high-pressure sample cells compatible with modern solution NMR probes (
15), detailed measurements of proteins unfolding under pressure with atomic resolution have now become possible (
5,
16–
18). Recent studies of staphylococcal nuclease (SNase) compellingly argue that the filling of void volumes present in the native state is the primary determinant of pressure-induced unfolding (
4–
6). A critical aspect of a “destruction of voids” mechanism for pressure-induced unfolding of proteins is whether the voids or cavities are occupied with water in the folded state. Early investigations of buried hydrophobic pockets indicated that even large cavities are typically not hydrated, whereas hydrophilic cavities generally are occupied by water (
19,
20). Many of the key studies impacting this question used the L99A single-point mutant of the model enzyme T
4 lysozyme (
20).The L99A mutation creates an internal cavity with an estimated volume of ∼150–160 Å
3, large enough to accommodate three or four water molecules (
21) (). Crystallographic investigation found no electron density within this pocket at ambient pressure (
22,
23). In contrast, solution NMR and molecular-dynamics simulations suggest that the region of the protein around the hydrophobic pocket is highly dynamic, possibly to the extent that the pocket may be transiently accessible to solvent (
22,
24–
27). Crystallographic studies conducted at high pressure conversely suggested that the region around the pocket is rigid and exhibits increasing rigidity with increased pressure (
23). Electron density also increased within the cavity as the hydrostatic pressure was increased (
22), consistent with a pressure-induced filling of the hydrophobic cavity with water molecules. In contrast, fluorescence and small-angle X-ray scattering studies in bulk solution demonstrated that the protein is unfolded at these elevated pressures (
2), suggesting that the crystal packing effects stabilize the protein. The hydrophobic cavity also provides a general, moderate-affinity binding site for small, relatively nonpolar ligands (
28).
Open in a separate windowHydration of T
4 lysozyme L99A at ambient pressure (∼1 bar). A backbone ribbon representation of L99A [Protein Data Bank (PDB) ID code 1L90 (
63)] is shown with the N-terminal domain (residues 13–65) illustrated in blue, and the C-terminal domain (residues 1–12 and 66–164) is colored green. The hydrophobic pocket created by the L99A mutation is shown as orange mesh, and the three tryptophan side chains are shown as stick representations. The helices are numbered as a reference for discussion in the text. Cyan spheres are shown at the positions of amide hydrogens where an NOE to the water resonance was detected. Yellow spheres indicate the positions of amide hydrogens within NOE distance (5 Å) of the interior of the hydrophobic pocket, but outside NOE distance to the protein surface. These are the sites where detection of NOEs to the water resonance would indicate hydration of the pocket. No NOE cross-peaks from these sites to the water resonance were observed, suggesting that the pocket is not hydrated at ambient pressure.T
4 lysozyme is one of the smallest known proteins to contain more than one cooperative folding unit. The folding of WT T
4 lysozyme has been examined in detail by using hydrogen–deuterium exchange approaches and has been shown to contain two domains that fold cooperatively and with distinct free energy profiles (
29–
32). The N-terminal domain is ∼6 kcal/mol less stable than the C-terminal domain. The cavity created by the L99A mutation is in the center of the C-terminal domain. The thermal stability of the L99A mutant is reduced compared with the WT protein by 16 °C (5 kcal/mol) (
33), an effect that is partially abrogated by binding hydrophobic ligands to the cavity (
28,
34).The L99A mutant of T
4 lysozyme provides a unique system to examine the hydration of internal pockets and the details of pressure-induced unfolding. In principle, protein–water interactions can be characterized by solution NMR methods (
35), but severe artifacts often render the approach quite limited (
36). Recently, it has been shown that various advantageous properties of proteins and water encapsulated within reverse micelles largely overcome these artifacts (
37,
38). Here, we use this approach to directly measure the hydration of the internal cavity. High-pressure NMR is used to examine the pressure-induced response of the protein in bulk solution and under confinement by the reverse micelle. We demonstrate that the hydrophobic pocket appears to be essentially dehydrated at ambient pressure (∼1 bar) and that the pressure response of the protein is an unfolding of the C-terminal domain only, representing an inversion of the relative stability of the domains as a result of the cavity-creating mutation. This result is in contrast to the unfolding of the cysteine-free WT (WT*) protein, which shows only the earliest stages of pressure-induced subglobal unfolding. Furthermore, the L99A mutant with benzene occupying the cavity shows no evidence of pressure unfolding. Nanoscale confinement of the protein also suppresses the L99A pressure-induced unfolding transition (
Pu) as a result of the restriction of conformational space imposed by the reverse micelle. In lieu of the pressure unfolding transition, the volume reduction imposed by increasing pressure is compensated for in the reverse micelle by progressively increasing incorporation of water into the cavity interior, essentially recapitulating the observations from high-pressure crystallography in a solution measurement. These findings have important implications with respect to the nature of pressure-induced unfolding, the roles of cavities in protein structural stability, and the effects of confinement, a critical parameter when considering the intracellular milieu, in which proteins must fold and carry out their functions.
相似文献