Rapid,Full-Scale Change to Virtual PCIT During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Implementation and Clinical Implications

Health agencies call for the immediate mobilization of existing interventions in response to numerous child and family mental health concerns that have arisen as result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Answering this call, this pilot study describes the rapid, full-scale change from a primarily clinic-based Parent–Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) model to a virtual service model (i.e., I-PCIT) in an academic and community-based program in Miami, Florida. First, we describe the virtual service training model our program developed and its implementation with 17 therapists (M_Age?=?32.35, 88.2% female, 47.1% Hispanic) to enable our clinic to shift from providing virtual services to a small portion of the families served (29.1%) to all of the families served. Second, we examine the effect of I-PCIT on child and caregiver outcomes during the 2-month stay-at-home period between March 16, 2020, and May 16, 2020, in 86 families (M_ChildAge?=?4.75, 71% Hispanic). Due to the rapid nature of the current study, all active participants were transferred to virtual services, and therefore there was no comparison or control group, and outcomes represent the most recently available scores and not treatment completion. Results reveal that I-PCIT reduced child externalizing and internalizing problems and caregiver stress, and increased parenting skills and child compliance with medium to large effects even in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic. Finally, the study examined components of our virtual service training model associated with the greatest improvements in child and caregiver outcomes. Preliminary findings revealed that locally and collaboratively developed strategies (e.g., online communities of practice, training videos and guides) had the strongest association with child and caregiver outcomes. Implications for virtual service delivery, implementation, and practice in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic are discussed.

     

One in Ten CD8+ Cells in the Pancreas of Living Individuals With Recent-Onset Type 1 Diabetes Recognizes the Preproinsulin Epitope PPI15-24

In type 1 diabetes (T1D), a lifelong autoimmune disease, T cells infiltrate the islets and the exocrine pancreas in high numbers. CD8⁺ T cells are the main cell type found in the insulitic lesion, and CD8⁺ T cells reactive against β-cell antigens have been detected in peripheral blood and in the pancreas of patients with short- or long-term disease. In the Diabetes Virus Detection (DiViD) study, researchers collected pancreatic tissue, by pancreatic tail resection, from living patients with recent-onset T1D. These tissues have been extensively studied by the scientific community, but the autoreactive nature of the T-cell infiltrate has remained unexplored. Our objective was to determine the number and localization of these cells in pancreas samples obtained through the DiViD study. Here, we demonstrate the presence of high frequencies of CD8⁺ T cells reactive against a highly relevant epitope derived from the preproinsulin signal peptide in pancreatic tissue samples from these donors. We also show the heterogeneity of islet distribution and CD8⁺ T-cell infiltration. Our findings contribute to the current limited existing knowledge of T-cell reactivity in the pancreas of donors with recent-onset T1D and indicate that antigen-specific therapies directed toward preproinsulin could have high clinical impact.     

Pediatric versus adult paradigms for management of adolescent injuries within a regional trauma system

BackgroundWe aimed to examine process and outcome indicators for adolescents with specific injury patterns managed in pediatric versus adult paradigms within the same trauma system.MethodsAdolescents (15–17 years old) admitted to the region's adult trauma center (ATC) or pediatric trauma center (PTC) with an abdominal injury, femur fracture or traumatic brain injury (TBI) were reviewed retrospectively. Global and injury-specific process and outcome indicators were compared.ResultsOf 141 ATC and 69 PTC patients, injury patterns differed significantly with more TBI and abdominal injuries at the ATC and femur fractures at the PTC. Overall injury severity was greater at the ATC. Patients with solid organ injuries appeared more likely to undergo embolization or splenectomy at the ATC; however, higher injury grade and later time period were the only variables significantly associated with this. Computed tomography (CT) was used significantly more frequently at the ATC overall, most notable with panscanning and head CTs for major TBI. Time to operative management did not differ for patients with isolated femur fractures. Neuropsychological follow up after minor TBI was documented more often at the PTC than the ATC; there was no difference for those with more severe TBIs.ConclusionsManagement varies for adolescents between PTCs and ATCs with more exposure to radiation and less neuropsychological follow-up of less severe TBIs at the ATC. This presents distinct opportunities to identify best policies for triage and sharing of management practices within a single regional inclusive trauma system in order to optimize short and long-term outcomes for this population.Type of studyRetrospective cohort.Level of evidenceLevel IV.     

External validity of phase III trials on vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 to a middle-aged and elderly Western European population

European Journal of Epidemiology - Initial results from various phase-III trials on vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 are promising. For proper translation of these results to clinical guidelines, it is...     

Adverse childhood experiences and the development of Down syndrome regression disorder

Down syndrome regression disorder (DSRD) is a clinical symptom cluster of acute or subacute neurocognitive regression in otherwise health persons with Down syndrome. The objective of this study was to evaluate if adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) were more prevalent in children with DSRD than those with DS alone. A survey-based, cohort-based study was performed. Caregivers of individuals with DSRD with onset of symptoms between age 10 and 30 years and DS alone were administered the ACEs questionnaire via an online REDCap survey. A total of 159 responses were collected after excluding incomplete surveys and those not meeting criteria for DSRD. Individuals with DSRD were not more likely to experience ACEs (p = 0.18, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.43–1.17). In those with ACEs prior to the onset of symptoms, the median time prior was 7 months (interquartile range: 5–10). Individuals with DSRD were more likely to report three or more ACEs (52, 33%) compared to those with DS alone (39, 22%) (p = 0.02, 95% CI: 1.08–2.87). Exposure to ACEs were not predictive of response to particular therapeutic interventions although those with multiple ACEs 3 months prior to the onset of symptoms was associated with lower response rates to benzodiazepines and immunotherapy (p = 0.02, 95% CI: −3.64–−1.13). This study provides preliminary data that individuals with DSRD experience ACEs at a similar rate to individuals with only DS alone, although three or more ACEs, often preceding the onset of symptoms, was more prevalent in individuals with DSRD.