Sympathetic nervous system function as measured by I-123 metaiodobenzylguanidine predicts transplant-free survival in heart failure patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND: Heightened activity of the sympathetic nervous system in heart failure patients is a major contributor to disease progression and death. I-123 metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) provides an accurate, noninvasive method to assess cardiac sympathetic nerve activity. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with New York Heart Association class II, III, or IV heart failure underwent baseline measurement of I-123 MIBG heart-to-mediastinum ratios, maximum oxygen consumption, radionuclide left ventricular ejection fraction, and plasma norepinephrine levels. Patients were followed 48.8+/-8.6 months to endpoints of cardiac death or transplantation. The heart-to-mediastinum ratio of I-123 MIBG activity measured 15 minutes after injection was the only independent predictor of transplant-free survival (P<.0001). I-123 MIBG imaging at 15 minutes identified patients with subsequent cardiac transplantation or death with a sensitivity of 92% and specificity of 72%, whereas the corresponding values for maximum oxygen consumption were 75% and 56%. By Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, the time to a cardiac endpoint was significantly shorter in patients with a 15-minute I-123 MIBG heart-to-mediastinum ratio below the group mean ratio of 1.536, compared with patients with a preserved I-123 MIBG ratio. Maximum oxygen consumption was not predictive of time to cardiac transplant or death. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of patients with congestive heart failure resulting from dilated cardiomyopathy, a 15-minute heart-to-mediastinum ratio of I-123 MIBG activity provided more accurate prediction of cardiac transplantation or death than other standard clinical tests.     

Microbiota That Affect Risk for Shigellosis in Children in Low-Income Countries

Pathogens in the gastrointestinal tract exist within a vast population of microbes. We examined associations between pathogens and composition of gut microbiota as they relate to Shigella spp./enteroinvasive Escherichia coli infection. We analyzed 3,035 stool specimens (1,735 nondiarrheal and 1,300 moderate-to-severe diarrheal) from the Global Enteric Multicenter Study for 9 enteropathogens. Diarrheal specimens had a higher number of enteropathogens (diarrheal mean 1.4, nondiarrheal mean 0.95; p<0.0001). Rotavirus showed a negative association with Shigella spp. in cases of diarrhea (odds ratio 0.31, 95% CI 0.17–0.55) and had a large combined effect on moderate-to-severe diarrhea (odds ratio 29, 95% CI 3.8–220). In 4 Lactobacillus taxa identified by 16S rRNA gene sequencing, the association between pathogen and disease was decreased, which is consistent with the possibility that Lactobacillus spp. are protective against Shigella spp.–induced diarrhea. Bacterial diversity of gut microbiota was associated with diarrhea status, not high levels of the Shigella spp. ipaH gene.     

Comparative efficacy and safety of aliskiren, an oral direct renin inhibitor, and ramipril in hypertension: a 6-month, randomized, double-blind trial

OBJECTIVES: This double-blind study compared long-term efficacy, safety and tolerability of the oral direct renin inhibitor aliskiren and the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor ramipril alone and combined with hydrochlorothiazide in patients with hypertension. METHODS: After a 2-4-week placebo run-in, 842 patients [mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (msDBP) 95-109 mmHg] were randomized to aliskiren 150 mg (n = 420) or ramipril 5 mg (n = 422). Dose titration (to aliskiren 300 mg/ramipril 10 mg) and subsequent hydrochlorothiazide addition (12.5 mg, titrated to 25 mg if required) were permitted at weeks 6, 12, 18 and 21 for inadequate blood pressure control. Patients completing the 26-week active-controlled treatment period were re-randomized to their existing regimen or placebo for a 4-week double-blind withdrawal phase. RESULTS: Six hundred and eighty-seven patients (81.6%) completed the active treatment period. At week 26, aliskiren-based therapy produced greater mean reductions in mean sitting systolic blood pressure (17.9 versus 15.2 mmHg, P = 0.0036) and msDBP (13.2 versus 12.0 mmHg, P = 0.025), and higher rates of systolic blood pressure control (< 140 mmHg; 72.5 versus 64.1%, P = 0.0075) compared with ramipril-based therapy. During withdrawal, blood pressure increased more rapidly after stopping ramipril than aliskiren-based therapy; median blood pressure reached 140/90 mmHg after 1 and 4 weeks, respectively. Blood pressure reductions were maintained with continued active treatment. Aliskiren therapy was well tolerated. Overall adverse event rates were similar with aliskiren (61.3%) and ramipril (60.4%); cough was more frequent with ramipril (9.5%) than aliskiren (4.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Aliskiren-based therapy was well tolerated and produced sustained blood pressure reductions in patients with hypertension over 6 months, greater than those with ramipril-based therapy.     

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and hypertension in primary hyperparathyroidism

To evaluate the role of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in the hypertension associated with primary hyperparathyroidism, we measured plasma renin activity and aldosterone concentration before and after maneuvers to suppress and stimulate this system in 11 hypertensive patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. We also measured plasma or urinary norepinephrine concentration to examine the role of catecholamines in the hypertension. The results were compared with an age- and race-matched control population. While the mean plasma aldosterone concentrations were normal, the mean plasma renin activity in response to furosemide stimulation was subnormal in subjects with hyperparathyroidism. Plasma or urinary norepinephrine concentrations were within the normal range. Thus a specific abnormality of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system or catecholamines could not be identified in these hypertensives with primary hyperparathyroidism.     

Outcomes and risks of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with coronary artery disease.

OBJECTIVES: Cytokine mobilization of progenitor cells from bone marrow may promote myocardial neovascularization with relief of ischemia. BACKGROUND: Patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) have low numbers of endothelial progenitor cells compared with healthy subjects. METHODS: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), 10 microg/kg/day for five days, was administered to 16 CAD patients. Progenitor cells were measured by flow cytometry; ischemia was assessed by exercise stress testing and by dobutamine stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor increased CD34+/CD133+ cells in the circulation from 1.5 +/- 0.2 microl to 52.4 +/- 10.4 microl (p < 0.001), similar to the response observed in 15 healthy subjects (75.1 +/- 12.6 microl, p = 0.173). Indices of platelet and coagulation activation were not changed by treatment, but C-reactive protein increased from 4.5 +/- 1.3 mg/l to 8.6 +/- 1.3 mg/l (p = 0.017). Two patients experienced serious adverse events: 1) non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI) 8 h after the fifth G-CSF dose, and 2) MI and death 17 days after treatment. At 1 month after treatment, there was no improvement from baseline values (i.e., reduction) in wall motion score (from 25.7 +/- 2.1 to 28.3 +/- 1.9, p = 0.196) or segments with abnormal perfusion (7.6 +/- 1.1 to 7.7 +/- 1.1, p = 0.916) and a trend towards a greater number of ischemic segments (from 4.5 +/- 0.6 to 6.1 +/- 1.0, p = 0.068). There was no improvement in exercise duration at 1 month (p = 0.37) or at 3 months (p = 0.98) versus baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration to CAD patients mobilizes cells with endothelial progenitor potential from bone marrow, but without objective evidence of cardiac benefit and with the potential for adverse outcomes in some patients.     

Eplerenone,a selective aldosterone blocker,in mild-to-moderate hypertension

BACKGROUND: Eplerenone, a selective aldosterone blocker (SAB) that is highly specific for the aldosterone receptor, has the potential to be efficacious in the treatment of hypertension. METHODS: This 8-week, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial assessed the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of eplerenone in eligible patients randomized to eplerenone 50, 100, or 400 mg once daily; eplerenone 25, 50, or 200 mg twice daily; spironolactone 50 mg twice daily; or placebo. The primary efficacy variable was the adjusted mean change in baseline to final visit for seated diastolic blood pressure (DBP). RESULTS: Of 417 randomized patients, 409 were evaluated for efficacy. The adjusted mean change from baseline to final visit in seated and standing systolic blood pressure (SBP) and DBP was significantly greater (P < .05) in all eplerenone groups than in the placebo group. The adjusted mean change in 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) measurements of SBP and DBP also documented a 24-h duration significantly greater (P < .05) than placebo in eplerenone-treated patients. For all measurements, the antihypertensive effect of eplerenone increased in a dose-response fashion. Eplerenone (100 mg) reduced BP by 75% compared with spironolactone (100 mg) and had an adverse events incidence rate similar to placebo. No antiandrogenic or progestational effects or clinically relevant safety issues were observed in eplerenone-treated patients. However, one spironolactone-treated patient reported menstrual irregularities. CONCLUSIONS: Eplerenone doses of 50 to 400 mg once daily are well tolerated and effective in reducing BP in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension during a 24-h period.