Assessment of tissue viability in complex extremity injuries: utility of the pyrophosphate nuclear scan

BACKGROUND: Extensive extremity injuries often require difficult decisions regarding the necessity for amputation or radical debridement. During the past decade, we have used technetium-99 pyrophosphate (PyP) scanning as an adjunct in this setting. This study was performed to assess the accuracy of PyP scan in predicting the need for amputation in relation to clinical, operative, and pathologic findings. METHODS: Review of our computerized registry identified 11 patients (10 men, age 36.1 +/- 14.9 years) admitted from 1990 to 1999 who underwent PyP scan. Using operative and pathologic findings, accuracy of the PyP scan was graded as supporting or refuting the clinical assessment of the need for amputation. RESULTS: Eight patients suffered high-voltage electrical injuries, one had severe frostbite, and two suffered soft-tissue infections. In most cases, PyP scan showed clear demarcation of viable and nonviable tissue, verifying the need for amputation (positive); those that demonstrated viable distal tissues confirmed at operation were considered negative. PyP scan had a sensitivity of 94%, a specificity of 100%, and an accuracy of 96% in this setting. CONCLUSION: Technetium-99 PyP scanning is a useful adjunct in predicting the need for amputation in extremities damaged by electrical injury, frostbite, or invasive infection. In addition, by providing an objective "picture" of extremity perfusion, PyP scans can be helpful in convincing patients of the need for amputation.     

Factors influencing pediatric injury in side impact collisions

BACKGROUND: Side impact collisions pose a great risk to children in crashes, but information about the injury mechanisms is limited. METHODS: This study involves a case series of children in side impact collisions who were identified through Partners for Child Passenger Safety, a large, child-focused crash surveillance system. The aim of the current study was to use in-depth crash investigations to identify injury mechanisms to children in side impact collisions. RESULTS: Ninety-three children in 55 side impact crashes were studied. Twenty-three percent (n = 22) of the children received an Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) score > or = 2 (clinically significant) injury. In these 22 children, head (40%), extremity (23%), and abdominal injuries (21%) were the most common significant injuries. Cases that illustrate body region-specific injury mechanisms are discussed. CONCLUSION: The cases revealed that serious injuries, particularly head injuries, occur even in minor crashes, and efforts should be made to make the interiors of vehicles more child occupant friendly. Lower extremity and abdominal injuries occurred because of contact with the intruding door. Design of vehicles to minimize crush should mitigate the occurrence and severity of these injuries.     

Computerized decision support for mechanical ventilation of trauma induced ARDS: results of a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Variability and logistic complexity of mechanical ventilatory support of acute respiratory distress syndrome, and need to standardize care among all clinicians and patients, led University of Utah/LDS Hospital physicians, nurses, and engineers to develop a comprehensive computerized protocol. This bedside decision support system was the basis of a multicenter clinical trial (1993-1998) that showed ability to export a computerized protocol to other sites and improved efficacy with computer- versus physician-directed ventilatory support. The Memorial Hermann Hospital Shock Trauma intensive care unit (ICU) (Houston, TX; a Level I trauma center and teaching affiliate of The University of Texas Houston Medical School) served as one of the 10 trial sites and recruited two thirds of the trauma patients. Results from the trauma patient subgroup at this site are reported to answer three questions: Can a computerized protocol be successfully exported to a trauma ICU? Was ventilator management different between study groups? Was patient outcome affected? METHODS: Sixty-seven trauma patients were randomized at the Memorial Hermann Shock Trauma ICU site. "Protocol" assigned patients had ventilatory support directed by the bedside respiratory therapist using the computerized protocol. "Nonprotocol" patients were managed by physician orders. RESULTS: Of the 67 trauma patients randomized, 33 were protocol (age 40 +/- 3; Injury Severity Score [ISS] 26 +/- 3; 73% blunt) and 34 were nonprotocol (age 38 +/- 2; ISS 25 +/- 2; 76% blunt). For the protocol group, the computerized protocol was used 96% of the time of ventilatory support and 95% of computer-generated instructions were followed by the bedside respiratory therapist. Outcome measures (i.e., survival, ICU length of stay, morbidity, and barotrauma) were not significantly different between groups. Fio2 > or = 0.6 and Pplateau > or = 35 cm H2O exposures were less for the protocol group. CONCLUSION: A computerized protocol for bedside decision support was successfully exported to a trauma center, and effectively standardized mechanical ventilatory support of trauma-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome without adverse effect on patient outcome.     

Clinical tests of standing balance: performance of persons with multiple sclerosis

OBJECTIVE: To investigate differences in performance between people with multiple sclerosis (MS) and control subjects on clinical tests of balance, and to assess performance consistency on balance tests in people with MS from morning to afternoon. STUDY DESIGN: Two factor repeated measures design with a two group sample of convenience. SETTING: Kingston Centre and the Camberwell Centre of the MS Society of Victoria, Australia. SUBJECTS: Fourteen people with MS and 14 control subjects matched for age, height, and sex. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Subjects were measured on their ability to maintain standing balance in steady stance, (feet apart, feet together, stride stance, tandem stance, and single leg stance), during self-generated perturbations (functional reach, arm raise, and step tests) and in response to an external perturbation. Participants with MS were also asked to rate their fatigue level in the morning and afternoon. RESULTS: There were no differences between MS and control groups on the ability to maintain standing balance with feet apart, feet together, or in stride stance. Participants with MS performed more poorly than control subjects in tandem stance and single leg stance and in the functional reach test, arm raise test, step test, and in response to an external perturbation. There was little change in balance from morning to afternoon in participants with MS (ICCs (2,1) .70 to .94), despite an increase in self-rated fatigue (t(14) = -3.14, p = .008). CONCLUSION: The ability to maintain balance in standing is a marked problem in people with MS despite the consistency of their performance from morning to afternoon.