Validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Self-Assessment Disability Scale in patients with Parkinson’s disease in Serbia

The symptoms of Parkinson’s disease (PD) worsen over time affecting performance and causing disability. The purpose of this study was to translate the Self-Assessment Disability Scale in patients with Parkinson's disease (SADS-PD) into the Serbian language and assess its validity and reliability. From January to July 2012, 114 consecutive PD patients were recruited at the Neurology Clinic in Belgrade. The inclusion criteria were: ability to walk independently for at least 10 m, ability to stand for at least 90 s. The exclusion criteria were: cognitive impairment, the presence of other major neurologic, psychiatric, visual, audio-vestibular, and orthopedic disturbances. The 25-item SADS-PD was translated according to internationally-accepted methodology. The internal consistency of the scale was evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. Test–retest reliability was evaluated using Kendall’s concordance coefficient for total scores. To evaluate construct validity, an exploratory factor analysis (principal component analysis, varimax rotation) was performed. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.984. Kendall’s concordance coefficient was 0.994. Duration of the disease, Hoehn & Yahr (H&Y) stage, Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor score, history of falls, Hamilton’s Depression and Anxiety Rating Scales (HDRS and HARS) scores were significantly correlated with the total SADS-PD score. On factor analysis 25 items in the SADS-PD questionnaire were separated in two clusters with total matrix variance of 79.7 %. The psychometric properties of the cross-culturally adapted SADS-PD questionnaire (Serbian version) have outstanding validity and reliability as an instrument for evaluation of the extent of disability in patients with PD.     

Medizinstudierendenauswahl in Deutschland

Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz - Das Bundesverfassungsgericht überprüft aktuell, ob das Vergabeverfahren der Medizinstudienplätze mit dem...     

Disturbed Anterior Prefrontal Control of the Mesolimbic Reward System and Increased Impulsivity in Bipolar Disorder

Bipolar disorder (BD) is characterized by recurrent mood episodes ranging from severe depression to acute full-blown mania. Both states of this severe psychiatric disorder have been associated with alterations of reward processing in the brain. Here, we present results of a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study on the neural correlates and functional interactions underlying reward gain processing and reward dismissal in favor of a long-term goal in bipolar patients. Sixteen medicated patients diagnosed with bipolar I disorder, euthymic to mildly depressed, and sixteen matched healthy controls performed the ‘desire-reason dilemma'' (DRD) paradigm demanding rejection of priorly conditioned reward stimuli to successfully pursue a superordinate goal. Both groups exhibited significant activations in reward-related brain regions, particularly in the mesolimbic reward system. However, bipolar patients showed reduced neural responses of the ventral striatum (vStr) when exploiting a reward stimulus, and exhibited a decreased suppression of the reward-related activation of the mesolimbic reward system while having to reject immediate reward in favor of the long-term goal. Further, functional interaction between the anteroventral prefrontal cortex and the vStr in the ‘DRD'' was significantly impaired in the bipolar group. These findings provide evidence for a reduced responsivity of the vStr to reward stimuli in BD, possibly related to clinical features like anhedonia. The disturbed top-down control of mesolimbic reward signals by prefrontal brain regions in BD can be interpreted in terms of a disease-related enhanced impulsivity, a trait marker of BD.     

Comprehensive Analysis of the HLA Class I and the HLA class II Alleles in Patients with Takayasu Arteritis: Relationship with Clinical Patterns and Prognosis

Background: Takayasu arteritis (TA) is a systemic vasculitis, affecting mainly the aorta and its branches. Objective: To analyze the HLA class I and class II alleles in patients with TA and explore their relationship with clinical and demographic characteristics, and potential significance in prognosis. Methods: Twenty-five, unrelated TA patients were genotyped for HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, HLA-DRB1, and the HLA-DQB1 loci. The frequencies of the HLA-A, HLA-B, and the HLA-DRB1 were compared with a control group of 1992, while the HLA-C and the HLA-DQB1 were compared with a group of 159 healthy, unrelated individuals. Results: Among TA patients, 5/25 (20%) were identified as the HLA-B*52 carriers. There was a significant difference in the HLA-B*52 allele frequency in the TA patients (10%) compared with the healthy controls (1.2%). Moreover, presence of the HLA-B*52 was associated with significantly earlier disease onset, more severe clinical presentations, and a poorer response to treatment. The HLA-C*03 was detected in 32% of patients and was present exclusively in those with a clinically mild form of the TA, indicating a putative protective effect. Conclusion: These findings indicate that the HLA-B*52 allele contributes to a higher susceptibility to the TA whereas the HLA-C*03, can be a protective factor in the TA.     

Educating about biomedical research ethics

This article examines the global and worsening problem of research misconduct as it relates to bio-medico-legal education. While research misconduct has serious legal implications, few adequate legal remedies exist to deal with it. With respect to teaching, research ethics education should be mandatory for biomedical students and physicians. Although teaching alone will not prevent misconduct, it promotes integrity, accountability, and responsibility in research. Policies and law enforcement should send a clear message that researchers should adhere to the highest standards of ethics in research. It is vital that researchers and physicians understand basic aspects of law and the legal system in order to develop understanding of the medico-legal issues not just in the legal context, but with a sound grounding in ethics, social and theoretical contexts so that they can practice good medicine. Routine and holistic research ethics education across the curriculum for medical students and resident physicians, and continuing medical education for practicing doctors, are probably the best ways to accomplish this goal.