Influence of resection margin on survival in hepatic resections for colorectal liver metastases

Background:

Traditionally a 1-cm margin has been accepted as the gold standard for resection of colorectal liver metastases. Evidence is emerging that a lesser margin may provide equally acceptable outcomes, but a critical margin, below which recurrence is higher and survival poorer, has not been universally agreed. In a recent publication, we reported peri-operative morbidity and clear margin as the two independent prognostic factors. The aim of the current study was to further analyse the effect of the width of the surgical margin on patient survival to determine whether a margin of 1 mm is adequate.

Methods:

Two hundred and sixty-one consecutive primary liver resections for colorectal metastases were analysed from 1992 to 2007. The resection margins were assessed by microscopic examination of paraffin sections. The initial analysis was performed on five groups according to the resection margins: involved margin, 0–1 mm, >1–<4 mm, 4–<10 mm and ≥ 10 mm. Subsequent analysis was based on two groups: margin <1 mm and >1 mm.

Results:

With a median follow-up of 4.7 years, the overall 5-year patient and disease-free survival were 38% and 22%, respectively. There was no significant difference in patient- or disease-free survival between the three groups with resection margins >1 mm. When a comparison was made between patients with resection margins ≤1 mm and patients with resection margins >1 mm, there was a significant 5-year patient survival difference of 25% versus 43% (P < 0.04). However, the disease-free survival difference did not reach statistical significance (P= 0.14).

Conclusions:

In this cohort of patients, we have demonstrated that a resection margin of greater than 1 mm is associated with significantly improved 5-year overall survival, compared with involved margins or margins less than or equal to 1 mm. The possible beneficial effect of greater margins beyond 1 mm could not be demonstrated.     

Graduating internal medicine residents' self-assessment and performance of advanced cardiac life support skills

Internal medicine residents in the US must be competent to perform procedures including Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) to become board-eligible. Our aim was to determine if residents near graduation could assess their skills in ACLS procedures accurately. Participants were 40 residents in a university-based training program. Self-assessments of confidence in managing six ACLS scenarios were measured on a 0 (very low) to 100 (very high) scale. These were compared to reliable observational ratings of residents' performance on a high-fidelity simulator using published treatment protocols. Residents expressed strong self-confidence about managing the scenarios. Residents' simulator performance varied widely (range from 45% to 94%). Self-confidence assessments correlated poorly with performance (median r = 0.075). Self-assessment of performance by graduating internal medicine residents was not accurate in this study. The use of self-assessment to document resident competence in procedures such as ACLS is not a proxy for objective evaluation.     

Altruism and compassion in the health professions: a search for clarity and precision

This article presents a conceptual model of altruism grounded in compassion in the health professions. The intent is to bring order out of the current conceptual chaos about the meaning and practical operation of these constructs. The theory-based model proposes that altruism is expressed as overt behavior in specific situations that vary in levels of intensity. It assumes that altruism is not a broad-based, cross-situational personal trait; that altruism can be measured objectively; and that altruism can be increased via education, practice and reinforcement. The article concludes by demonstrating the progression from formation of a theory-based conceptual model, development of objective measures, performing systematic research and accumulating an orderly and consensual body of knowledge about altruism grounded in compassion in the health professions.     

Simulation technology for health care professional skills training and assessment.

Changes in medical practice that limit instruction time and patient availability, the expanding options for diagnosis and management, and advances in technology are contributing to greater use of simulation technology in medical education. Four areas of high-technology simulations currently being used are laparoscopic techniques, which provide surgeons with an opportunity to enhance their motor skills without risk to patients; a cardiovascular disease simulator, which can be used to simulate cardiac conditions; multimedia computer systems, which includes patient-centered, case-based programs that constitute a generalist curriculum in cardiology; and anesthesia simulators, which have controlled responses that vary according to numerous possible scenarios. Some benefits of simulation technology include improvements in certain surgical technical skills, in cardiovascular examination skills, and in acquisition and retention of knowledge compared with traditional lectures. These systems help to address the problem of poor skills training and proficiency and may provide a method for physicians to become self-directed lifelong learners.