Inter- and Intra-Subject Variability of Neuromagnetic Resting State Networks

Functional connectivity studies conducted at the group level using magnetoencephalography (MEG) suggest that resting state networks (RSNs) emerge from the large-scale envelope correlation structure within spontaneous oscillatory brain activity. However, little is known about the consistency of MEG RSNs at the individual level. This paper investigates the inter- and intra-subject variability of three MEG RSNs (sensorimotor, auditory and visual) using seed-based source space envelope correlation analysis applied to 5 min of resting state MEG data acquired from a 306-channel whole-scalp neuromagnetometer (Elekta Oy, Helsinki, Finland) and source projected with minimum norm estimation. The main finding is that these three MEG RSNs exhibit substantial variability at the single-subject level across and within individuals, which depends on the RSN type, but can be reduced after averaging over subjects or sessions. Over- and under-estimations of true RSNs variability are respectively obtained using template seeds, which are potentially mislocated due to inter-subject variations, and a seed optimization method minimizing variability. In particular, bounds on the minimal number of subjects or sessions required to obtain highly consistent between- or within-subject averages of MEG RSNs are derived. Furthermore, MEG RSN topography positively correlates with their mean connectivity at the inter-subject level. These results indicate that MEG RSNs associated with primary cortices can be robustly extracted from seed-based envelope correlation and adequate averaging. MEG thus appears to be a valid technique to compare RSNs across subjects or conditions, at least when using the current methods.     

Surgical anatomy of the preauricular anteroparotid approach for mandibular condyle surgery

Purpose

The different surgical approaches used to treat mandibular condyle fractures are carried out in the periparotid skin area and can lead to facial nerve injury. We conducted a preauricular and anteroparotid surgical approach. Our main aim was to show the anatomical relationship between this approach site and the facial nerve branches, and to define cutaneous landmarks to locate the extraparotid facial nerve branches.

Method

A 2-step dissection of 13 fresh human cadaver semi-heads was performed: a preauricular approach followed by a superficial parotidectomy to visualize the facial nerve. Its course and ramifications were studied and compared to cutaneous landmarks. The proximity of the facial nerve branches with the surgical approach site was observed.

Results

The approach allowed systematically visualising the zygomatic and/or buccal branches. No facial nerve branches were sectioned. In three cases (23 %), a nerve branch was visualized during the approach. The buccal and zygomatic branches were ramified in 77 % of cases.

Conclusions

During our preauricular anteroparotid approach, the buccal and zygomatic branches were visualized but none was sectioned. Most often the approach was carried out between these two branches (46 % of cases). Cutaneous landmarks used were reliable to define a safe and nerve-free area for dissection. The buccal and zygomatic branches are very interesting because their high number of ramifications and anastomoses could serve as nerve relays in case of surgical lesion.     

Molecular findings and clinical data in a cohort of 150 patients with anophthalmia/microphthalmia

Anophthalmia and microphthalmia (AM) are the most severe malformations of the eye, corresponding respectively to reduced size or absent ocular globe. Wide genetic heterogeneity has been reported and different genes have been demonstrated to be causative of syndromic and non‐syndromic forms of AM. We screened seven AM genes [GDF6 (growth differentiation factor 6), FOXE3 (forkhead box E3), OTX2 (orthodenticle protein homolog 2), PAX6 (paired box 6), RAX (retina and anterior neural fold homeobox), SOX2 (SRY sex determining region Y‐box 2), and VSX2 (visual system homeobox 2 gene)] in a cohort of 150 patients with isolated or syndromic AM. The causative genetic defect was identified in 21% of the patients (32/150). Point mutations were identified by direct sequencing of these genes in 25 patients (13 in SOX2, 4 in RAX, 3 in OTX2, 2 in FOXE3, 1 in VSX2, 1 in PAX6, and 1 in GDF6). In addition eight gene deletions (five SOX2, two OTX2 and one RAX) were identified using a semi‐quantitative multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) [quantitative multiplex PCR amplification of short fluorescent fragments (QMPSF)]. The causative genetic defect was identified in 21% of the patients. This result contributes to our knowledge of the molecular basis of AM, and will facilitate accurate genetic counselling.     

How Many Have Died from Undiagnosed Human Immunodeficiency Virus–Associated Histoplasmosis,A Treatable Disease? Time to Act

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)–associated disseminated Histoplasma capsulatum capsulatum infection often mimics tuberculosis. This disease is well know in the United States but is dramatically underdiagnosed in Central and South America. In the Amazon region, given the available incidence data and the regional HIV prevalence, it is expected that, every year, 1,500 cases of histoplasmosis affect HIV patients in that region alone. Given the mortality in undiagnosed patients, at least 600 patients would be expected to die from an undiagnosed but treatable disease. The lack of a simple diagnostic tool and the lack of awareness by clinicians spiral in a vicious cycle and made a major problem invisible for 30 years. The HIV/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome community should tackle this problem now to prevent numerous avoidable deaths from HIV-associated histoplasmosis in the region and elsewhere.In the Guianas and the Amazon Basin, the prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is approximately 1%. There have been some decreases in incidence in some states in this region, but recent increases in incidence in northern states of Brazil have been reported.^1–3 The population of the Amazon basin is estimated to be approximately 10 million persons,⁴ which would imply that approximately 100,000 persons are HIV positive in the Amazon Basin.The Amazonian environment is suitable for the growth of Histoplasma capsulatum.⁵ For immunocompetent patients, this organism causes mostly benign infections, but in severely immunodepressed HIV-infected patients, infection with this organism leads to a fatal disease in the absence of diagnosis and treatment. There lies the problem. Clinical symptoms are unspecific and often mimic those of tuberculosis.^6,7 Diagnosis is difficult and requires invasive procedures (biopsies, bone marrow smears), and trained staff to detect H. capsulatum, often after weeks of culture.⁸ Severe infections are often fatal within days.⁹ However, death often occurs after long delays in which patients are unsuccessfully treated for unconfirmed tuberculosis. Patients die because they are not treated for a treatable disease and because there is no diagnosis test. With no diagnosis, this possibility is not included in the diagnostic and treatment algorithms of clinicians who, despite unknowingly encountering this disease on a regular basis, have never seen a case because it was never diagnosed. In this context, then why give presumptive treatment of a disease that is not present?It is tragic but it makes total sense. It is even frighteningly tragic when one crunches the numbers to estimate what it means that after 30 years of the HIV epidemic, one of the leading causes of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) in the Amazon¹⁰ still goes largely unrecognized and evolves under the radar of national plans and international funding efforts.The only incidence data available for this region suggests that the incidence of histoplasmosis during the highly active antiretroviral therapy era was 1.5 cases/100 person-years.¹⁰ The historical mortality rate of disseminated histoplasmosis was > 30% despite mycology expertise.^7,8 This finding indicates that for 100,000 HIV patients, there would be 1,500 cases of histoplasmosis/year and 600 deaths/year, and probably more if undiagnosed. This finding also indicates that for more than 30 years the cumulated death rate in the region must have been huge, in the tens of thousands.A rational sceptic could rightly doubt this claim from the generalization of data from the smallest South American territory to the entire Amazon and elsewhere. However, when one reviews the literature, it becomes evident that histoplasmosis is present throughout the region, this fact has been known for decades, and that we should have been paying more attention.⁵ The high prevalence of histoplasmin test reactivity in the region was known even before AIDS was identified in 1981.¹¹ Histoplasmosis has been an AIDS-defining illness since 1993. We should have connected the dots earlier.How could something so huge escape the attention of the HIV/AIDS community in the region? One explanation for this dramatic blind spot is that in the region, the diagnostic capacity for mycology has been insufficient. It has been long argued that medical mycology is a neglected area of biology, and that the often low incidence of mycoses is caused by a lack of medical mycologists rather than the absence of the mycoses.¹² Another explanation is that the standard conceptualization of HIV/AIDS, the usual indicators, and the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS terminology and framework did not explicitly entail disseminated histoplasmosis or the regional AIDS-defining illnesses. The anesthetic effect of the familiarity of vertical concepts and vertical programs can make it difficult to reframe the problem and see what was always there.For better diagnostic and treatment, we should know what AIDS is to direct diagnostic hypotheses when caring for individual patients. Misdiagnosing histoplasmosis as tuberculosis, not only delays a life-saving treatment of the individual patient, but it can confound tuberculosis statistics (incidence, resistance, mortality) and make it difficult to evaluate tuberculosis program results.The current financial difficulties should not stand in the way of building the diagnostic capacity for detection of histoplasmosis. It does not necessarily cost much to do the diagnosis. Treatment relies on amphotericin B for severe forms and itraconazole for non-severe forms and prophylaxis.⁷ Both drugs are generic drugs that are perfectly affordable. The toxicity of amphotericin B leads industrialized countries to use the costly liposomal version of the drug. However, The Drugs for Neglected Disease Initiative is releasing a cheap alternative that was developed for treatment of cryptococcosis.¹³ This is an opportunity for resource-limited countries in disease-endemic areas for treatment of histoplasmosis. We should not wait any longer. Every year wasted to build capacity for diagnosis and treatment of histoplasmosis in the Amazon Basin and elsewhere leads to hundreds of deaths that could have been avoided. This is not acceptable.     

Positioning sulphonylureas in a modern treatment algorithm for patients with type 2 diabetes: Expert opinion from a European consensus panel

The large number of pharmacological agents available to treat type 2 diabetes (T2D) makes choosing the optimal drug for any given patient a complex task. Because newer agents offer several advantages, whether and when sulphonylureas (SUs) should still be used to treat T2D is controversial. Published treatment guidelines and recommendations should govern the general approach to diabetes management. However, expert opinions can aid in better understanding local practices and in formulating individual choices. The current consensus paper aims to provide additional guidance on the use of SUs in T2D. We summarize current local treatment guidelines in European countries, showing that SUs are still widely proposed as second-line treatment after metformin and are often ranked at the same level as newer glucose-lowering medications. Strong evidence now shows that sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are associated with low hypoglycaemia risk, promote weight loss, and exert a positive impact on vascular, cardiac and renal endpoints. Thus, using SUs in place of SGLT-2is and GLP-1RAs may deprive patients of key advantages and potentially important cardiorenal benefits. In subjects with ascertained cardiovascular disease or at very high cardiovascular risk, SGLT-2is and/or GLP-1RAs should be used as part of diabetes management, in the absence of contraindications. Routine utilization of SUs as second-line agents continues to be acceptable in resource-constrained settings.