Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy Can Be Used As Primary Therapy for Esophageal Achalasia Regardless of Age

Introduction

Laparoscopic Heller-Dor surgery is the current treatment of choice for patients with esophageal achalasia, but elderly patients are generally referred for less invasive treatments (pneumatic dilations or botulinum toxin injections).

Aim

To assess the effect of age on the surgical outcome of patients receiving laparoscopic Heller-Dor as primary treatment.

Methods

Demographic and clinical findings were prospectively collected on patients undergoing laparoscopic Heller-Dor from 1992 to 2012. Patients were classified in three age brackets: group A (≤45 years), group B (45–70), and group C (≥70). Treatment was defined as a failure if the postoperative symptom score was >10th percentile of the preoperative score (i.e., >8). We consecutively performed the Heller-Dor in 571 achalasia patients, 305 (53.4 %) in group A, 226 (39.6 %) in group B, and 40 (7 %) in group C.

Results

The mortality was nil; the conversion and morbidity rates were both 1.1 %. Group C patients had higher preoperative symptom scores (p?=?0.02), while the symptom duration was similar in all three groups. Mucosal tears occurred in 17 patients (3 %): 6 (2 %) in group A, 8 (3.5 %) in group B, and 3 (7.5 %) in group C (p?=?0.09). The postoperative hospital stay was slightly longer for group C (p?=?0.06).

Discussion

The treatment failure rate was quite similar: 31 failures in group A (10.1 %), 19 in group B (8.4 %), and 3 in group C (7.5 %; p?=?0.80). These failures were seen more in manometric pattern III (22.2 %, p?=?0.002). Laparoscopic Heller-Dor can be used as the first therapeutic approach to achalasia even in elderly patients with an acceptable surgical risk.     

Massive blood transfusion after the first cut in liver transplantation predicts renal outcome and survival

Introduction

Transfusion requirements of blood products may provide useful prognostic factors for the prediction of short-term patient mortality and renal outcome after liver transplantation.

Patients and methods

Two hundred ninety-one consecutive liver transplants in adults were analysed retrospectively. Combined and living-related liver transplants were excluded. The amount of transfused packed red blood cells (PRBC) and units of platelets (UP) within the first 48 h were investigated as prognostic factors to predict short-term patient mortality and renal outcome. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis with area under the curve (AUC), Hosmer-Lemeshow tests and Brier scores were used to calculate overall model correctness, model calibration and accuracy of prognostic factors. Cut-off values were determined with the best Youden index.

Results

The potential clinical usefulness of PRBC as a prognostic factor to predict 30-day mortality (cut-off 17.5 units) and post-transplant haemodialysis (cut-off 12.5 units) could be demonstrated with AUCs >0.7 (0.712 and 0.794, respectively). Hosmer-Lemeshow test results and Brier scores indicated good overall model correctness, model calibration and accuracy. The UP proved as an equally clinically useful prognostic factor to predict end-stage renal disease (cut-off 3.5 units; AUC?=?0.763). The association of cut-off levels of PRBC with patient survival (p?<?0.001, log-rank test) and dialysis-free survival (p?<?0.001, log-rank test) was significant (cut-off levels 17.5 and 12.5 units, respectively) as well as the association of UP with dialysis-free survival (p?<?0.001, log-rank test) (cut-off level 3.5 units).

Conclusions

The impressive discriminative power of these simple prognostic factors for the prediction of outcome after liver transplantation emphasizes the relevance of strategies to avoid excessive transfusion requirements.     

Surgical strategy for primary hyperparathyreoidism with thyroid hemiagenesis

Background

Thyroid hemiagenesis is a rare congenital anomaly, and still more rarely associated with primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT). Due to the embryologic pathways of the thyroid and parathyroid glands, it remains unclear whether or not thyroid hemiagenesis may be linked to ipsilateral parathyroid agenesis, and consequently, surgical strategy for thyroid hemiagenesis associated pHPT (THAP) does not only depend on preoperative localization but also on the thyroid anomaly.

Methods

Including the present case report, a total of nine cases with THAP retrieved from the literature were reviewed. Seven of nine cases had thyroid hemiagenesis on the left side, three out of nine showed a parathyroid adenoma on the contralateral side to the thyroid hemiagenesis.

Conclusions

Based on these cases, it can be concluded that the embryologic pathways of the thyroid and parathyroid glands are different, and in cases of THAP, parathyroid exploration should follow standard recommendations for pHPT surgery.     

Degenerative lumbar scoliosis in elderly patients: dynamic stabilization without fusion versus posterior instrumented fusion

Background contextPosterolateral fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation is currently the most widely accepted technique for degenerative lumbar scoliosis in elderly patients. However, a high incidence of complications has been reported in most series. Dynamic stabilization without fusion in patients older than 60 years has not previously been compared with the use of posterior fusion in degenerative lumbar scoliosis.PurposeTo compare dynamic stabilization without fusion and posterior instrumented fusion in the treatment of degenerative lumbar scoliosis in elderly patients, in terms of perioperative findings, clinical outcomes, and adverse events.Study designA retrospective study.Patient sampleFifty-seven elderly patients were included. There were 45 women (78%) and 12 men (22%) with a mean age of 68.1 years (range, 61–78 years). All patients had degenerative de novo lumbar scoliosis, associated with vertebral canal stenosis in 51 cases (89.4%) and degenerative spondylolisthesis in 24 patients (42.1%).Outcome measuresClinical (Oswestry Disability Index, visual analog scale, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire) and radiological (scoliosis and lordosis corrections) outcomes as well as incidence of complications.MethodsPatients were divided into two groups: 32 patients (dynamic group) had dynamic stabilization without fusion and 25 patients (fusion group) underwent posterior instrumented fusion. All the patients' medical records and X-rays were reviewed. Preoperative, postoperative, and follow-up questionnaires were obtained to evaluate clinical outcomes.ResultsAt an average follow-up of 64 months (range, 42–90 months), clinical results improved similarly in both groups of patients. Statistically superior scoliosis and final lordosis corrections were achieved with posterior fusion (56.9% vs. 37.3% and ?46.8° vs. ?35.8°, respectively). However, in the dynamic group, incidence of overall complications was lower (25% vs. 44%), and fewer patients required revision surgery (6.2% vs. 16%). Furthermore, lower average values of operative duration (190 vs. 240 minutes) and blood loss (950 vs. 1,400 cc) were observed in the dynamic group than in the fusion group.ConclusionsIn elderly patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis, pedicle screw–based dynamic stabilization was less invasive with shorter operative duration, less blood loss, and lower adverse event rates than instrumented posterior fusion. Scoliosis curve reduction and lumbar lordosis were superior after fusion; however, dynamic stabilization achieved satisfying values of both these parameters, and these results were stable after an average follow-up of more than 5 years. Furthermore, there was no difference between the two techniques in terms of functional clinical outcomes at the last follow-up.     

Do stand-alone interbody spacers with integrated screws provide adequate segmental stability for multilevel cervical arthrodesis?

Background contextSome postoperative complications after anterior cervical fusions have been attributed to anterior cervical plate (ACP) profiles and the necessary wide operative exposure for their insertion. Consequently, low-profile stand-alone interbody spacers with integrated screws (SIS) have been developed. Although SIS constructs have demonstrated similar biomechanical stability to the ACP in single-level fusions, their role as a stand-alone device in multilevel reconstructions has not been thoroughly evaluated.PurposeTo evaluate the acute segmental stability afforded by an SIS device compared with the traditional ACP in the setting of a multilevel cervical arthrodesis.Study designIn vitro human cadaveric biomechanical analysis.MethodsThirteen human cadaveric cervical spines (C2–T1) were nondestructively tested with a custom 6 df spine simulator under axial rotation, flexion-extension, and lateral bending loading. After intact analysis, eight single-levels (C4–C5/C6–C7) from four specimens were instrumented and tested with ACP and SIS. Nine specimens were tested with C5–C7 SIS, C5–C7 ACP, C4–C7 ACP, C4–C7 ACP+posterior fixation, C4–C7 SIS, and C4–C7 SIS+posterior fixation. Testing order was randomized with each additional level instrumented. Full range of motion (ROM) data were obtained and analyzed by each loading modality, using mean comparisons with repeated measures analysis of variance. Paired t tests were used for post hoc analysis with Sidak correction for multiple comparisons.ResultsNo significant difference in ROM was noted between the ACP and SIS for single-level fixation (p>.05). For multisegment reconstructions (two and three levels), the ACP proved superior to SIS and intact condition, with significantly lower ROM in all planes (p<.05). When either the three-level SIS or ACP constructs were supplemented with posterior lateral mass fixation, there was a greater than 80% reduction in ROM under all testing modalities (p<.05), with no significant difference between the ACP and SIS constructs (p>.05).ConclusionsThe SIS device may be a reasonable option as a stand-alone device for single-level fixation. However, SIS devices should be used with careful consideration in the setting of multilevel cervical fusion. However, when supplemented with posterior fixation, SIS devices are a sound biomechanical alternative to ACP for multilevel fusion constructs.