首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   60篇
  免费   17篇
耳鼻咽喉   1篇
儿科学   1篇
基础医学   1篇
口腔科学   1篇
临床医学   16篇
内科学   23篇
外科学   3篇
预防医学   5篇
眼科学   1篇
药学   1篇
肿瘤学   24篇
  2024年   5篇
  2023年   16篇
  2022年   5篇
  2021年   3篇
  2020年   6篇
  2019年   6篇
  2018年   7篇
  2017年   6篇
  2016年   9篇
  2015年   4篇
  2014年   6篇
  2013年   2篇
  2011年   1篇
  1993年   1篇
排序方式: 共有77条查询结果,搜索用时 31 毫秒
61.
    

Objective

To describe health equity research priorities for health care delivery systems and delineate a research and action agenda that generates evidence-based solutions to persistent racial and ethnic inequities in health outcomes.

Data Sources and Study Setting

This project was conducted as a component of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's (AHRQ) stakeholder engaged process to develop an Equity Agenda and Action Plan to guide priority setting to advance health equity. Recommendations were developed and refined based on expert input, evidence review, and stakeholder engagement. Participating stakeholders included experts from academia, health care organizations, industry, and government.

Study Design

Expert group consensus, informed by stakeholder engagement and targeted evidence review.

Data Collection/Extraction Methods

Priority themes were derived iteratively through (1) brainstorming and idea reduction, (2) targeted evidence review of candidate themes, (3) determination of preliminary themes; (4) input on preliminary themes from stakeholders attending AHRQ's 2022 Health Equity Summit; and (5) and refinement of themes based on that input. The final set of research and action recommendations was determined by authors' consensus.

Principal Findings

Health care delivery systems have contributed to racial and ethnic disparities in health care. High quality research is needed to inform health care delivery systems approaches to undo systemic barriers and inequities. We identified six priority themes for research; (1) institutional leadership, culture, and workforce; (2) data-driven, culturally tailored care; (3) health equity targeted performance incentives; (4) health equity-informed approaches to health system consolidation and access; (5) whole person care; (6) and whole community investment. We also suggest cross-cutting themes regarding research workforce and research timelines.

Conclusions

As the nation's primary health services research agency, AHRQ can advance equitable delivery of health care by funding research and disseminating evidence to help transform the organization and delivery of health care.  相似文献   
62.
63.
64.
65.
66.
In this first article of the “Do You Know Your Guidelines” series, we review National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommendations and underlying evidence for the follow‐up and surveillance of head and neck cancer survivors. The goals of follow‐up and surveillance care are (1) to maximize long‐term oncologic outcomes of therapy with appropriate evaluation for recurrence, (2) to maximize functional and quality of life outcomes, and (3) minimizing unnecessary and harmful low‐value care. Finding the right balance of testing and surveillance is a challenge for providers and patients. Herein, we review all NCCN recommendations for head and neck cancer survivors. We pay particular attention to an area of controversy: the use of ongoing surveillance imaging, in particular, PET/CT scans. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38 : 168–174, 2016  相似文献   
67.
68.
69.
70.
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号