Radial artery in CABG: could the early results be comparable to internal mammary artery graft?

Background. The accidental detection of patency of radial artery grafts, by Acar, which had been labeled as blocked 18 years earlier, has led to its revival as a conduit in coronary artery bypass surgery. We used radial artery as one of the grafts in 287 patients from February 1996 to June 1998. Here we present our early clinical experience and the midterm angiographic follow up of the initial 62 patients.

Methods. A no touch, atraumatic harvesting technique coupled with gentle hydrostatic and pharmacological dilatation of the radial artery graft was employed. Radial artery was used to revascularize coronary vessels with >80% proximal stenosis. Postoperatively, the patients were administered a low dose nifedipine that was continued for 6 months thereafter. The patients were followed up clinically after discharge from the hospital and angiographic evaluation of the grafted radial artery by selective injection was done at a mean interval of 16.2 ± 5.1 months (3–24 months) postoperatively.

Results. There was no perioperative or late myocardial infarction or mortality. No significant complications related to the harvesting of radial artery were encountered. Angiographically, the radial artery grafts were found to be patent in 96.8% of patients (60/62). Mild distal anastomotic narrowing was seen in angiogram of one patient with good filling of the target vessel. Another patient showed diffuse spasm of radial artery graft. The patency of the pedicled left internal mammary grafts was also 98.2% (56/57). All the patients were asymptomatic.

Conclusions. Radial artery seems to be an excellent alternate arterial conduit for myocardial revascularization with early and midterm patency rates equivalent to that of pedicled internal mammary artery, and it should be used more often for myocardial revascularization as an adjunct to pedicled internal mammary artery graft.     

Tarlov Cyst and Infertility

Background/Objective: Tarlov cysts or spinal perineurial cysts are uncommon lesions. These are mostly incidental findings on magnetic resonance imaging or myelograms. The objectives of this study were to describe Tarlov cysts of the sacral region as a potential cause for retrograde ejaculations and review available management options.

Methods: Case report and literature review.

Results: A 28-year-old man presented with back pain and retrograde ejaculations resulting in infertility. After microsurgical excision of large perineurial cysts, back pain resolved, but semen quality showed only marginal improvement. Later, the couple successfully conceived by intrauterine insemination. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of Tarlov cyst associated with retrograde ejaculation and infertility.

Conclusions: Despite being mostly asymptomatic and an incidental finding, Tarlov cyst is an important clinical entity because of its tendency to increase in size with time. Tarlov cysts of the sacral and cauda equina region may be a rare underlying cause in otherwise unexplained retrograde ejaculations and infertility. Microsurgical excision may be a good option in a select group of patients.     

Randomized trial comparing diathermy hemorrhoidectomy with the scissor dissection Milligan-Morgan operation

Twenty consecutive patients (12 male and 8 female) with second-degree, third-degree, or thrombosed hemorrhoids were randomly allocated to undergo either diathermy hemorrhoidectomy (n=10) or a scissor dissection Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy (n=10). No significant difference was found in the postoperative pain score between the groups. On a scale of 0 to 10, the mean daily pain score in the diathermy group was 4.0, and it was 4.1 in the scissor dissection group. Nor was there any significant difference in the length of inpatient stay (diathermy group, 3.5 days; scissor dissection group, 4.0 days) or in the time between the operation and the first bowel action (diathermy group, 2.0 days; scissor dissection group, 30 days). Diathermy hemorrhoidectomy has no significant advantage over the scissor dissection classical Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy.