p53 expression and disease outcome of breast cancer patients undergoing primary chemotherapy with anthracycline-containing regimens

Primary chemotherapy administered to breast cancer patientsis the best model to identify baseline features able to predictwhich patients may be most likely to benefit or not from a cytotoxicregimen. In the March issue of Annals of Oncology two papersevaluated the predictive role of immunohistochemical p53 expressionon     

Avascular osteonecrosis after hyperthermia in children and adolescents with pelvic malignancies: a retrospective analysis of potential risk factors.

PURPOSE: In children with locally advanced or recurrent malignant tumours, prognosis can be improved by regional deep hyperthermia (RHT) in combination with platin-based chemotherapy. However, because of the increasing number of patients that achieve long-time remission with this therapy, it is necessary to evaluate long-term sequelae of thermochemotherapy. During the years 1993-2004 one has observed avascular osteonecrosis (AON) of the femoral head after RHT in seven children with pelvic germ cell tumours or rhabdomyosarcomas. METHODS: Although AON may develop in patients with malignancies treated with chemo- or radiotherapy alone, RHT might nevertheless contribute to the occurrence of AON. In order to determine potential risk factors for AON after RHT, this study analysed the relationship of AON to the patient's age, medical history and treatment parameters such as thermal dose equivalent and power output. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: In the present study AON was associated with young age as well as intensity of hyperthermia indicated by high power levels that exceed 20 W per kg body weight and/or application of eight or more heat sessions as well as additional radiotherapy. Based on this observation, it was assumed that an optimized three dimensional thermal field modelling may be helpful to avoid hazardous temperatures in the femoral heads during RHT treatment and to reduce AON of the femoral heads.     

研究结果的解释和报告

科学研究的目标是创造和传播知识。这得通过对系统收集以及报告信息的批判性分析来完成。批判性分析始于一个简单的步骤，即在运用复杂统计学分析方法进行比较之前对所收集的数据进行深入检查。根据所收集的数据类型按照标准化方式进行统计学分析。在为解决研究问题而需采用合理、标准化步骤进行比较时，新知识就产生了，同时要避免错误的结论。在对数据进行仔细检查和分析之后，为了保证结论的正确性，再对数据进行一次批判性评论是非常重要的补充步骤。在科学文献中发表研究成果过程中涉及的同行评价对于传播新知识并保证其质量方面是一个非常重要的步骤。如果没有将研究成果发表供同行参考，这项研究就不算完整。