Does desmopressin acetate prophylaxis reduce blood loss after valvular heart operations? A randomized, double-blind study.

The effectiveness of prophylactic desmopressin acetate in reducing hemorrhage after cardiopulmonary bypass operations is controversial. We conducted a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial to determine its effectiveness and safety in such patients. Eighty-three evaluable patients undergoing valvular heart operations were randomized to receive desmopressin (0.3 microgram/kg) (41) or placebo (42) after cardiac bypass. Demographic characteristics were similar in both groups. There was no significant difference in total 24-hour blood loss between groups (desmopressin 1064.8 +/- 647.1 ml versus placebo 844.4 +/- 507.6 ml; p greater than 0.05), or in the requirement for red blood cell, platelet, or fresh frozen plasma transfusion, or for reexploration for control of hemorrhage. Neither was there a difference in the occurrence of thrombotic complications between groups. Analysis of factor VIII activity, von Willebrand factor, or von Willebrand factor multimers failed to show significant correlations with blood loss or differences between groups except for factor VIII activity, which was significantly higher in the desmopressin group 1 hour after operation than in the placebo group. A detailed comparative analysis of similar trials to determine the reasons for different outcomes suggests that desmopressin should not be used routinely as a prophylactic agent to reduce postsurgical hemorrhage, but that it may be beneficial when used in patients who already manifest excessive bleeding postoperatively.     

Type 2 diabetes: assessment of endothelial lesion and fibrinolytic system markers.

This study aimed to investigate whether endothelial cells are damaged and to evaluate fibrinolytic system function in patients with type 2 diabetes. For this proposal, plasma levels of von Willebrand factor (an endothelial marker of injury), homocysteine (an inductor of endothelial injury), D-dimer (a marker of coagulation cascade activation) and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (a fibrinolysis marker) were measured in individuals with both type 2 diabetes and high blood pressure, with type 2 diabetes, with high blood pressure and in healthy control individuals. No significant differences among groups were observed for von Willebrand factor and homocysteine plasma levels. The type 2 diabetes and high blood pressure group presented a significant difference to the other groups for D-dimer and also presented high values for plasminogen activator inhibitor-1. The high blood pressure group and type 2 diabetes group presented separately higher values of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 compared with the control group. High levels of D-dimer and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 in patients with type 2 diabetes and high blood pressure with normoalbuminuria therefore indicate a state of hypercoagulability and hypofibrinolysis, despite no evident microvascular injury supported by normal levels of von Willebrand factor and homocysteine.     

Tamponade caused by cardiac lipomatous hypertrophy.

Cardiac lipomatous hypertrophy is an unusual disorder that typically affects the interatrial septum. We report a case in which large subpericardial deposits of fat were initially mistaken for a pericardial effusion and the subsequent clinical picture resembled tamponade. The patient improved following a pericardiectomy.     

The -Omes are coming! The -Omes are coming! Research on the epididymis in the 21st century

Looking at the history of epididymal research provides a level of confidence in predictions of cause and effect that looking at the future cannot achieve. Thus, when one of us （Hamilton, 2002） wrote a short essay on the history of the testicular excurrent ducts it became fairly obvious that advances in understanding the epididymis followed advances in other fields, particularly those that provided new instrumentation to probe at ever finer levels of detail. Can this same theme lead to predictions about what will happen in epididymis research over the next century？