Which dyskinesia scale best detects treatment response?

Numerous scales assess dyskinesia in Parkinson's disease (PD), variably focusing on anatomical distribution, phenomenology, time, severity, and disability. No study has compared these scales and their relative ability to detect change related to an established treatment. We conducted a randomized placebo‐controlled trial of amantadine, assessing dyskinesia at baseline and at 4 and 8 weeks using the following scales: Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale (UDysRS), Lang‐Fahn Activities of Daily Living Dyskinesia Rating Scale (LF), 26‐Item Parkinson's Disease Dyskinesia scale (PDD‐26), patient diaries, modified Abnormal Involuntary Movements Scale (AIMS), Rush Dyskinesia Rating Scale (RDRS), dyskinesia items from the Movement Disorder Society–sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS‐UPDRS), and Clinical Global Impression (severity and change: CGI‐S, CGI‐C). Scale order was randomized at each visit, but raters were aware of each scale as it was administered. Sensitivity to treatment was assessed using effect size. Sixty‐one randomized dyskinetic PD subjects (31 amantadine, 30 placebo) completed the study. Four of the 8 scales (CGI‐C, LF, PDD‐26, and UDysRS) detected a significant treatment. The UDysRS Total Score showed the highest effect size (η² = 0.138) for detecting treatment‐related change, with all other scales having effect sizes < 0.1. No scale was resistant to placebo effects. This study resolves 2 major issues useful for future testing of new antidyskinesia treatments: among tested scales, the UDysRS, having both subjective and objective dyskinesia ratings, is superior for detecting treatment effects; and the magnitude of the UDysRS effect size from amantadine sets a clear standard for comparison for new agents. © 2012 Movement Disorder Society     

Common data elements for clinical research in Friedreich's ataxia

To reduce study start‐up time, increase data sharing, and assist investigators conducting clinical studies, the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke embarked on an initiative to create common data elements for neuroscience clinical research. The Common Data Element Team developed general common data elements, which are commonly collected in clinical studies regardless of therapeutic area, such as demographics. In the present project, we applied such approaches to data collection in Friedreich's ataxia (FRDA), a neurological disorder that involves multiple organ systems. To develop FRDA common data elements, FRDA experts formed a working group and subgroups to define elements in the following: ataxia and performance measures; biomarkers; cardiac and other clinical outcomes; and demographics, laboratory tests, and medical history. The basic development process included identification of international experts in FRDA clinical research, meeting by teleconference to develop a draft of standardized common data elements recommendations, vetting of recommendations across the subgroups, and dissemination of recommendations to the research community for public comment. The full recommendations were published online in September 2011 at http://www.commondataelements.ninds.nih.gov/FA.aspx . The subgroups′ recommendations are classified as core, supplemental, or exploratory. Template case report forms were created for many of the core tests. The present set of data elements should ideally lead to decreased initiation time for clinical research studies and greater ability to compare and analyze data across studies. Their incorporation into new, ongoing studies will be assessed in an ongoing fashion to define their utility in FRDA. © 2012 Movement Disorder Society     

Pathological gambling in Parkinson's disease: Subthalamic oscillations during economics decisions

Pathological gambling develops in up to 8% of patients with Parkinson's disease. Although the pathophysiology of gambling remains unclear, several findings argue for a dysfunction in the basal ganglia circuits. To clarify the role of the subthalamic nucleus in pathological gambling, we studied its activity during economics decisions. We analyzed local field potentials recorded from deep brain stimulation electrodes in the subthalamic nucleus while parkinsonian patients with (n = 8) and without (n = 9) pathological gambling engaged in an economics decision‐making task comprising conflictual trials (involving possible risk‐taking) and non conflictual trials. In all parkinsonian patients, subthalamic low frequencies (2–12 Hz) increased during economics decisions. Whereas, in patients without gambling, low‐frequency oscillations exhibited a similar pattern during conflictual and non conflictual stimuli, in those with gambling, low‐frequency activity increased significantly more during conflictual than during non conflictual stimuli. The specific low‐frequency oscillatory pattern recorded in patients with Parkinson's disease who gamble could reflect a subthalamic dysfunction that makes their decisional threshold highly sensitive to risky options. When parkinsonian patients process stimuli related to an economics task, low‐frequency subthalamic activity increases. This task‐related change suggests that the cognitive‐affective system that drives economics decisional processes includes the subthalamic nucleus. The specific subthalamic neuronal activity during conflictual decisions in patients with pathological gambling supports the idea that the subthalamic nucleus is involved in behavioral strategies and in the pathophysiology of gambling. © 2013 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society     

Systematic review of the diagnostic utility of SPECT imaging in dementia

Single-photon emission-computed tomography (SPECT) may potentially contribute to the diagnostic work up of patients with neurodegenerative dementia. This systematic review aims to establish the diagnostic utility of ^99mTc-hexamethylpropyleneamine (^99mTc-HMPAO) and ^99mTc-ethylcysteine dimer SPECT in distinguishing between Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD), AD and vascular dementia (VD), AD and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), and AD and normal controls (NC). We searched MEDLINE and Embase databases via OVID for articles from January 1985 to May 2012 and identified additional studies from reviews and references. Of 755 studies, 49 studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria for this systematic review; AD versus FTD (n = 13), AD versus VD (n = 18), AD versus DLB (n = 5), and AD versus NC (n = 18). We compiled relevant data and graded the studies with an internal and external validity criteria checklist. We pooled the studies with a clinical diagnosis and those using ^99mTc-HMPAO SPECT in a meta-analysis, calculating the pooled weighted sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratios using DerSimonian–Laird random-effects model. The pooled weighted sensitivity and specificity of ^99mTc-HMPAO-SPECT in distinguishing clinically diagnosed AD from FTD are 79.7 and 79.9 %, respectively, AD from VD are 74.5 and 72.4 %, AD from DLB are 70.2 and 76.2 %, and AD from NC are 76.1 and 85.4 %. SPECT does have diagnostic value, particularly in differentiating Alzheimer’s disease from frontotemporal dementia and normal controls; however, it should not be used in isolation, rather as an adjunct, and interpreted in the context of clinical information and paraclinical test results.     

An enhanced treatment effect can be expected from a higher serum thyroglobulin level after radioactive iodine therapy

Annals of Nuclear Medicine - The aim of this study was to investigate if increased serum thyroglobulin (Tg) levels after radioactive iodine (RAI) showed more therapeutic effects in patients with...