Dual Exposure to Sevoflurane Improves Anesthetic Preconditioning in Intact Hearts

Background: Anesthetic preconditioning (APC) with sevoflurane reduces myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury. The authors tested whether two brief exposures to sevoflurane would lead to a better preconditioning state than would a single longer exposure and whether dual exposure to a lower (L) concentration of sevoflurane would achieve an outcome similar to that associated with a single exposure to a higher (H) concentration.

Methods: Langendorff-prepared guinea pig hearts were exposed to 0.4 mm sevoflurane once for 15 min (H1-15; n = 8) or 0.4 mm (H2-5; n = 8) or 0.2 mm sevoflurane (L2-5; n = 8) twice for 5 min, with a 5-min washout period interspersed. Sevoflurane was then washed out for 20 min before 30 min of global no-flow ischemia and 120 min of reperfusion. Control hearts (n = 8) were not subjected to APC. Left ventricular pressure was measured isovolumetrically. Ventricular infarct size was determined by tetrazolium staining and cumulative planimetry. Values are expressed as mean +/- SD.

Results: The authors found a better functional return and a lesser percentage of infarction on reperfusion in H2-5 (28 +/- 9%) than in H1-15 (36 +/- 8%; P < 0.05), L2-5 (43 +/- 6%; P < 0.05), or control hearts (52 +/- 7%; P < 0.05).     

Type 2 diabetes: assessment of endothelial lesion and fibrinolytic system markers.

This study aimed to investigate whether endothelial cells are damaged and to evaluate fibrinolytic system function in patients with type 2 diabetes. For this proposal, plasma levels of von Willebrand factor (an endothelial marker of injury), homocysteine (an inductor of endothelial injury), D-dimer (a marker of coagulation cascade activation) and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (a fibrinolysis marker) were measured in individuals with both type 2 diabetes and high blood pressure, with type 2 diabetes, with high blood pressure and in healthy control individuals. No significant differences among groups were observed for von Willebrand factor and homocysteine plasma levels. The type 2 diabetes and high blood pressure group presented a significant difference to the other groups for D-dimer and also presented high values for plasminogen activator inhibitor-1. The high blood pressure group and type 2 diabetes group presented separately higher values of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 compared with the control group. High levels of D-dimer and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 in patients with type 2 diabetes and high blood pressure with normoalbuminuria therefore indicate a state of hypercoagulability and hypofibrinolysis, despite no evident microvascular injury supported by normal levels of von Willebrand factor and homocysteine.     

A random clinical trial study to assess the efficiency of topical applications of podophyllin resin (25%) versus podophyllin resin (25%) together with acyclovir cream (5%) in the treatment of oral hairy leukoplakia.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the efficiency of topical applications of podophyllin resin (25%) (P) versus podophyllin resin (25%) together with acyclovir cream (5%) (PA) in the treatment of oral hairy leukoplakia (OHL) in accordance with the following criteria: (1) number of applications necessary for the total clinical resolution of OHL; (2) correlation between the decrease of lesion size and the number of applications; (3) total clinical resolution of OHL; and (4) clinical reevaluation 12 months after the end of treatment. STUDY DESIGN: Forty-six OHLs were treated with P (P group) or with PA (PA group). Applications were performed weekly. Student t, Fisher exact, and Pearson correlation tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: All 24 lesions from the PA group presented total clinical resolution while 4 lesions from the P group did not. The P group required up to 25 applications performed weekly while the PA group required up to 18. Observed was a negative significant association between the size of the lesions and the number of applications performed weekly in the PA group. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrated the following: (1) P and PA topical treatments presented a similar average number of applications performed weekly; (2) both groups showed the same clinical response at 12 months post-therapy; and (3) PA presented a 100% clinical resolution and a continuous decrease in OHL size over the course of weekly applications.     

Saliva substitute in xerostomic patients with primary Sj?gren's syndrome: a single-blind trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of oral moisturizing gel (Oral Balance) in xerostomic patients with primary Sj?gren's syndrome (SS). METHOD AND MATERIALS: Twenty-one xerostomic patients with primary SS were subjected to a single-blind trial in which the efficacy of Oral Balance gel in reducing xerostomia and xerostomia-related oral symptoms was compared with that of a placebo. Both gels were packaged identically and were indiscernible in appearance and taste. Xerostomia was confirmed for all the patients through measurement of stimulated whole saliva. Patients began using the Oral Balance gel three times a day for 90 days, and were then switched to a gel placebo to be used in the same way for the same length of time. Clinical response was evaluated through the patients' subjective assessment (improved, worsened, or unaltered) of both gels. RESULTS: Neither the Oral Balance gel nor the gel placebo affected the salivary output of the patients. The Oral Balance gel presented a substantial statistically significant advantage in the control of burning mouth, mastication, and swallowing. No statistically significant relief of the isolated sensation of oral dryness was established. CONCLUSION: Oral Balance is a useful tool in the management of dryness-related oral symptoms in primary SS, but there is room for enhancing the overall properties of topical preparations designed to reduce oral complaints in xerostomic patients.     

Acute bacterial endocarditis due to Hemophilus parainfluenzae. Response to ceftizoxime in an ampicillin-allergic patient

Endocarditis secondary to Hemophilus parainfluenzae is an uncommon entity that appears to be increasing in frequency, perhaps due to improved laboratory isolation techniques. Although controversial, most of the published literature recommends a penicillin, with or without concomitant gentamicin, as definitive therapy. We report the first successful use of the third-generation cephalosporin ceftizoxime in an ampicillin-allergic patient. A 55-year-old white female was hospitalized after 5 days of experiencing fever, chills, nausea, and vomiting. A cardiac echocardiogram revealed a large mitral valve vegetation, and the patient was treated with intravenous ampicillin, gentamicin, and clindamycin. Two weeks after emergency mitral valve replacement the patient developed spiking fevers and a macular, erythematous rash while receiving ampicillin. Ceftizoxime was initiated and continued to complete a 4-week period of intravenous antibiotics. Follow-up at 14 months showed no further evidence of infection. Ceftizoxime appears efficacious in eradicating H. parainfluenzae in patients allergic to penicillin.     

Head injury mortality in two centers with different emergency medical services and intensive care

The authors report data collected prospectively on 551 cases of head injury in New Delhi, India, and 822 cases in Charlottesville, Virginia. The mortality rate, adjusted for initial severity of injury, was 11.0% in New Delhi versus 7.2% in Charlottesville (p less than 0.02). There was a striking similarity in mortality rates at both centers when comparing patients with the least severe head injuries and those with the most severe injuries according to the motor score of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS M). However, in the group with an abnormal but purposeful motor response (GCS M = 5), the mortality rate was 12.5% in New Delhi versus 4.8% in Charlottesville (p less than 0.01). The relative absence of prehospital emergency care and the delay in admission after head injury in New Delhi are cited as two possible causes for the differences in mortality rates in this subgroup of patients with "moderate" head injuries.