Analysis of protease-activated receptor-1 and -2 in human scar formation

Protease-activated receptor (PAR)-1 and PAR-2 are reported to contribute to the fibrotic process in a number of organs, including lung, liver, pancreas, and kidney. The aim of this study was to localize expression and biological activity of PAR-1 and PAR-2 in normal and pathological cutaneous scars. First, we investigated the immunohistochemical expression of PAR-1 and PAR-2 proteins in a series of human normal scars (NS, n = 10), hypertrophic scars (HS, n = 10), and keloids (K, n = 10). Expression of PAR-1 and PAR-2 was observed in all types of scar. Specifically, in HS and K, diffuse PAR-1 and PAR-2 positivity was found in dermal cellular areas composed of myofibroblasts, while no or minor staining was observed in the scattered fibroblasts embedded in abundant extracellular matrix in the context of the more collagenous nodules, irrespective of the type of scar. The hyperplastic epidermis overlying K was also found to be strongly PAR-1 and PAR-2 positive, whilst in most NS and HS the epidermis was faintly to moderately stained. Second, ribonuclease protection assay on paraffin-embedded specimens showed overexpression of PAR-1 and PAR-2 mRNA in K compared to NS and HS. Third, cultured human fibroblasts exposed to TGF-beta1 expressed a myofibroblast phenotype associated with overexpression of PAR-2, while PAR-1 expression was unaffected. Intracellular Ca(2+) mobilization by PAR-2 agonists in myofibroblasts was increased as compared to fibroblasts, whereas the effect of PAR-1 agonists was unchanged. Our in vivo study indicates that PAR-1 and PAR-2 are expressed in cells involved in physiological and pathological scar formation and suggests that in vitro overexpression and exaggerated functional response of PAR-2 may play a role in the function of myofibroblasts in scar evolution from a physiological repair process to a pathological tissue response.     

Prostatic ductal adenocarcinoma presenting as a urethral polyp: a clinicopathological study of eight cases of a lesion with the potential to be misdiagnosed as a benign prostatic urethral polyp

AIMS: Centrally located prostatic ductal adenocarcinoma can present as a single urethral polyp mimicking a benign polyp. Such lesions have not been formally studied. METHODS AND RESULTS: Clinicopathological and immunohistochemical findings of eight cases were analysed. Patients (mean age 76 years) presented with urinary symptoms and haematuria. Mean serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) was 7.01 ng/mL (range 1.04-21). Single small polyps were seen on cystourethroscopy with a clinical diagnosis of benign polyps. The most common architectural patterns were cribriform and papillary. Five cases had mild cytological atypia, three of which were initially diagnosed as benign prostatic urethral polyps. All cases were positive for PSA and 34betaE12. Seven cases tested were positive for AMACR (a-methylacyl-CoA racemase), p63 and cytokeratin (CK) 7 and 70% for CK20. Proliferative activity defined as Ki-67 labelling index was high (mean 26%, range 20-35%). Adenocarcinoma, predominantly ductal, was found in other specimens in four patients. CONCLUSIONS: Centrally located prostatic ductal adenocarcinoma has the propensity to mimic benign urethral polyps clinically and histopathologically. Basal cell immunostaining may not help with this distinction but AMACR is useful. Prominent glandular complexity including cribriform patterns, nuclear pseudostratification, at least mild atypia and a high Ki-67 index distinguish these lesions from prostatic urethral polyps.     

Organ donor screening for carbapenem‐resistant gram‐negative bacteria in Italian intensive care units: the DRIn study

The 759 cases of brain death declaration (BDD [Italian law, 6 hours of observation time]) that occurred in 190 Italian intensive care units (ICUs) between May and September 2012 were studied to quantify carbapenem‐resistant gram‐negative bacteria (CR‐GN) isolated in organ donors, to evaluate adherence to national screening guidelines, and to identify risk factors for CR‐GN isolation. Mandatory blood, bronchoalveolar lavage, and urine cultures were performed on the BDD day in 99% of used donors. Because results were rarely made available before transplant, >20% of transplants were performed before obtaining any microbiological information, and organs from 15 of 22 CR‐GN cases were used. Two (lung–liver) of the 37 recipients died, likely because of donor‐derived early CR‐GN sepsis. ICU stay >3 days (odds ratio [OR] = 7.49, P = .004), fever (OR = 3.11, P = .04), age <60 years (OR = 2.80, P = .06), and positive ICU epidemiology (OR = 8.77, P = .07) were associated with CR‐GN isolation. An association between single ICU and risk of CR‐GN was observed, as a result of differences across ICUs (ICC = 29%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.5%‐72%) probably related to inadequate practices of infection control. Continuous education aimed at implementing priority actions, including stewardship programs for a rational use of antimicrobials, is a priority in healthcare systems and transplant networks. Improved awareness among ICU personnel regarding the importance of early CR‐GN detection and timely alert systems might facilitate decisions regarding organ suitability and eventually save recipient lives.     

Enhancer blocking activity located near the 3′ end of the sea urchin early H2A histone gene

The sea urchin early histone repeating unit contains one copy of each of the five histone genes whose coordinate expression during development is regulated by gene-specific elements. To learn how within the histone repeating unit a gene-specific activator can be prevented to communicate with the heterologous promoters, we searched for domain boundaries by using the enhancer blocking assay. We focused on the region near the 3′ end of the H2A gene where stage-specific nuclease cleavage sites appear upon silencing of the early histone genes. We demonstrated that a DNA fragment of 265 bp in length, defined as sns (for silencing nucleoprotein structure), blocked the enhancer activity of the H2A modulator in microinjected sea urchin embryos only when placed between the enhancer elements and the promoter. We also found that sns silenced the modulator elements even when placed at 2.7 kb from the promoter. By contrast, the enhancer activity of the modulator sequences, located downstream to the coding region, was not affected when sns was positioned in close proximity to the promoter. Finally, the H2A sns fragment placed between the simian virus 40 regulative region and the tk promoter repressed chloramphenicol acetyltransferase expression in transfected human cell lines. We conclude that 3′ end of the H2A gene contains sequence elements that behave as functional barriers of enhancer function in the enhancer blocking assay. Furthermore, our results also indicate that the enhancer blocking function of sns lacks enhancer and species specificity and that it can act in transient assays.