Role of brachytherapy in stage III endometrial cancer treated with adjuvant chemotherapy: Identifying factors predictive of a survival benefit

OBJECTIVESTo determine which patients with stage III endometrial cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy derive benefit from the addition of vaginal brachytherapy, as stage III is a highly heterogeneous population with substantial variations in practice.METHODSPatients with FIGO stage III endometrial carcinoma diagnosed 2004–2016 who underwent at least total hysterectomy and adjuvant multiagent chemotherapy were identified in the National Cancer Database. The primary outcome was overall survival according to receipt of brachytherapy, stratified by histologic type, pathological features, and status of pelvic external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), and analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox multivariable regression.RESULTSIn total, 9369 patients were identified (24% stage IIIA, 5% stage IIIB, 71% stage IIIC; 61% endometrioid, 39% nonendometrioid histology), and 28% received brachytherapy. In the endometrioid cohort, brachytherapy was associated with a 5% absolute increase in 3-year overall survival (87% vs. 82%, p < 0.0001), which persisted in multivariable analysis (adjusted hazard ratio 0.74, 95% confidence interval 0.64–0.84, p < 0.0001). The benefit of brachytherapy was greater in patients not also receiving EBRT, and in patients with vaginal/parametrial extension, grade 3 disease, lymphovascular invasion, and/or deep myometrial invasion. In the nonendometrioid cohort, brachytherapy was associated with a significant survival benefit in univariable but not multivariable analysis, regardless of EBRT status or pathological features.CONCLUSIONSFactors predictive of brachytherapy benefit were endometrioid histology and pathological risk factors for local recurrence. Additionally, brachytherapy appeared more beneficial in patients not already receiving pelvic EBRT. Further research is warranted to determine which stage III patients may be best served by brachytherapy, EBRT, or both.     

Birth seasons and heights among girls and boys below 12 years of age: lasting effects and catch-up growth among native Amazonians in Bolivia

Background: Seasons affect many social, economic, and biological outcomes, particularly in low-resource settings, and some studies suggest that birth season affects child growth.

Aim: To study a predictor of stunting that has received limited attention: birth season.

Subjects and methods: This study uses cross-sectional data collected during 2008 in a low-resource society of horticulturists-foragers in the Bolivian Amazon, Tsimane’. It estimates the associations between birth months and height-for-age Z-scores (HAZ) for 562 girls and 546 boys separately, from birth until age 11?years or pre-puberty, which in this society occurs ～13–14?years.

Results: Children born during the rainy season (February–May) were shorter, while children born during the end of the dry season and the start of the rainy season (August–November) were taller, both compared with their age–sex peers born during the rest of the year. The correlations of birth season with HAZ were stronger for boys than for girls. Controlling for birth season, there is some evidence of eventual partial catch-up growth, with the HAZ of girls or boys worsening until?～?age 4–5?years, but improving thereafter. By age 6?years, many girls and boys had ceased to be stunted, irrespective of birth season.

Conclusion: The results suggest that redressing stunting will require attention to conditions in utero, infancy and late childhood.     

Comparison of patient reported outcomes after Triathlon? and Kinemax Plus prostheses

INTRODUCTION

The Triathlon^® (Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI, US) total knee replacement was designed to improve patient function and survivorship. The aim of this study was to determine whether the Triathlon^® prosthesis produces better patient reported outcomes than a previous design by the same manufacturer, the Kinemax Plus.

METHODS

The outcome of 233 knees of patients with a mean age of 68 years (range: 40–80 years) who received the Kinemax Plus prosthesis were compared with the outcomes of 220 knees of patients with a mean age of 70 years (range: 42–90 years) who received the Triathlon^® prosthesis. Data were collected via postal questionnaire prior to surgery as well as at 8–12 weeks and at 1 year following surgery. Validated questionnaires were used including the WOMAC^® (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities) pain and function scales, the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score quality of life scale and the self-administered patient satisfaction scale.

RESULTS

This study found that patients who had the Triathlon^® prosthesis had significantly better pain relief (p<0.0001), function (p=0.028), knee related quality of life (p<0.0001) and satisfaction (p=0.0003) at three months after surgery than those who received the Kinemax Plus prosthesis. In addition, knee related quality of life (p=0.002) and satisfaction (p=0.021) were significantly higher at one year after surgery in Triathlon^® patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that return to function and reduction in pain may occur more quickly in patients with a Triathlon^® prosthesis than in those with the Kinemax Plus.