Exploring the decision-making preferences of people with colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVES: To explore patient views on participation in treatment, physical care and psychological care decisions and factors that facilitate and hinder patients from making decisions. DESIGN: Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with patients. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Three NHS Trusts in the north-west of England. Theoretical sampling including 41 patients who had been treated for colorectal cancer. RESULTS: For patients, participation in the decision-making process was about being informed and feeling involved in the consultation process, whether patients actually made decisions or not. The perceived availability of treatment choices (surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy) was related to type of treatment. Factors that impacted on whether patients wanted to make decisions included a lack of information, a lack of medical knowledge and trust in medical expertise. Patients perceived that they could have a more participatory role in decisions related to physical and psychological care. CONCLUSION: This study has implications for health professionals aiming to implement policy guidelines that promote patient participation and shared partnerships. Patients in this study wanted to be well informed and involved in the consultation process but did not necessarily want to use the information they received to make decisions. The presentation of choices and preferences for participation may be context specific and it cannot be assumed that patients who do not want to make decisions about one aspect of their care and treatment do not want to make decisions about other aspects of their care and treatment.     

T cell vaccinology: Exploring the known unknowns

The objective of modern vaccine development is the safe generation of protective long-term immune memory, both prophylactic and therapeutic. Live attenuated vaccines generate potent cellular and humoral immunity 0005, 0010 and 0015, but numerous problems exist with these vaccines, ranging from production and storage issues to adverse reactions and reversion to virulence. Subunit vaccines are safer, more stable, and more amenable to mass production. However the protection they produce is frequently inferior to live attenuated vaccines and is typically confined to humoral, and not cellular immunity. Unfortunately, there are presently no subunit vaccines available clinically that are effective at eliciting cellular responses let alone cellular memory [4]. This article will provide and overview of areas of investigation that we see as important for the development of vaccines with the capacity to induce robust and enduring cellular immune responses.