Doctor,please make me freer: Capabilities enhancement as a goal of medicine

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy - Biomedical innovations are making possible the enhancement of human capabilities. There are two philosophical stances on the role that medicine should play in...     

进展期胃癌多药耐药基因表达的临床意义

目的 探讨多药耐药基因（MDR1基因）在人胃癌组织中的表达及其与临床病理的关系。方法 采用逆转录－多聚酶链反应（RT－PCR）法检测了215例手术切除的进展期胃癌组织中的MDR1基因的表达。实验数据采用SAS软件中的χ^2检验和Fisher’s exact P做统计学处理。结果 MDRI基因的阳性率为31．63％（68／215）,与年龄、性别、组织学类型、分化程度、淋巴结转移、Borromann分型及TNM分期等无关,但在分化差的肿瘤中有增高趋势,如黏液腺癌及印戒细胞癌中达41．67％及50．00％。结论 化疗前胃癌组织中MDRI基因即存在较高的表达率,这为选用化疗药物和MDR逆转剂提供了参考指标,但不能作为制定化疗方案的唯一指标。     

Abordajes en cirugía tiroidea

Thyroidectomy is the most frequent procedure in endocrine surgery. The conventional approach through a collar incision, as described by Kocher in XIX^th century, has become the “gold standard”. It is continuously evolving in spite of, many years ago, it showed to be safe and efficient with quality standards difficult to beat.Endoscopic and robotic surgery have developed “new approaches” to thyroid in order to improve the cosmetic results, looking even for invisible scars.We have done a thoughtful review of most of them trying to understand their benefits and drawbacks.Currently none of these “new approaches” have been shown to be better than conventional open thyroidectomy beyond offering a better cosmetic result. Besides, only a small percentage of patients can benefit of them. However, most of these approaches will remain if they treat the diseased thyroid and also improve the quality of life of our patients.     

Mitigating disparity in children with acute appendicitis: Impact of patient-driven protocols

PurposePrevious reports in the literature demonstrate racial and ethnic disparities for children diagnosed with acute appendicitis, with minorities experiencing worse outcomes. At our institution, we have developed an evidence based patient driven protocol for children following laparoscopic appendectomy. However, the influence of such protocol on mitigating racial and ethnic disparities in outcomes remains unknown. The purpose of our study is to assess the impact of our protocol by evaluating the influence of race and ethnicity on surgical outcomes among children treated for acute appendicitis.Material and methodsA retrospective review of prospectively collected data was conducted. Children undergoing a laparoscopic appendectomy at our freestanding children's hospital between December 2015 and July 2017 were included. Demographic data, post-operative length of stay, same day discharge rates and hospital readmission rates were abstracted from patient medical records. Patients were classified by their race and ethnic background. Comparative analysis was performed in STATA with a p value < .05 determined as significant.ResultsA total of 786 children were included, with the majority being either White (70%, n = 547), Black (8%, n = 62) or Hispanic (17%, n = 133); 569 patients (72%) were found to have non-perforated appendicitis. There was no statistically significant difference in the rates of same day discharge among White, Black or Hispanic children respectively (88% vs. 77% vs. 86%, p = .126). Of the 217 children with perforated appendicitis, Hispanic children had increased rates of perforation (41%, n = 55) compared to White and Black children respectively (23%, n = 128 and 29%, n = 18, p = .001). However, average post-operative length of stay were similar among White, Black and Hispanic children (96 h vs. 95 h vs. 98 h, p = .015). On multivariate analysis, the only significant risk factor for an elevated post-operative length of stay was the presence of a perforation.ConclusionOur evidence based patient driven protocol effectively mitigates racial and ethnic disparities found in children with acute appendicitis. Further prospective investigation into the role of such patient-driven protocols to mitigate healthcare disparities is warranted.Levels of EvidenceTherapeutic study; Level 3.     

Hospital‐based health systems 20 years later: A taxonomy for policy research and analysis

ObjectiveBuilding on the original taxonomy of hospital‐based health systems from 20 years ago, we develop a new taxonomy to inform emerging public policy and practice developments.Data SourcesThe 2016 American Hospital Association''s (AHA) Annual Survey; the 2016 IQVIA Healthcare Organizations and Systems (HCOS) database; and the 2017‐2018 National Survey of Healthcare Organizations and Systems (NSHOS).Study DesignCluster analysis of the 2016 AHA Annual Survey data to derive measures of differentiation, centralization, and integration to create categories or types of hospital‐based health systems.Data CollectionPrincipal components factor analysis with varimax rotation generating the factors used in the cluster algorithms.Principal FindingsAmong the four cluster types, 54% (N = 202) of systems are decentralized (−0.35) and relatively less differentiated (−0.37); 23% of systems (N = 85) are highly differentiated (1.28) but relatively decentralized (−0.29); 15% (N = 57) are highly centralized (2.04) and highly differentiated (0.65); and approximately 9 percent (N = 33) are least differentiated (−1.35) and most decentralized (−0.64). Despite differences in calculation, the Highly Centralized, Highly Differentiated System Cluster and the Undifferentiated, Decentralized System Cluster were similar to those identified 20 years ago. The other two system clusters contained similarities as well as differences from those 20 years ago. Overall, 82 percent of the systems remain relatively decentralized suggesting they operate largely as holding companies allowing autonomy to individual hospitals operating within the system.ConclusionsThe new taxonomy of hospital‐based health systems bears similarities as well as differences from 20 years ago. Important applications of the taxonomy for addressing current challenges facing the healthcare system, such as the transition to value‐based payment models, continued consolidation, and the growing importance of the social determinants of health, are highlighted.