Overexpressed eIF4E is functionally active in surgical margins of head and neck cancer patients via activation of the Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin pathway.

PURPOSE: Overexpression of eIF4E in surgical margins of head and neck cancer patients is an independent risk factor for recurrence. We hypothesize that overexpressed eIF4E is functionally active in tumor margins through activation of the Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Western blots and/or immunohistochemistry were performed to determine whether phosphorylation of mTOR and activation of its downstream molecules eIF4E-binding protein-1 (4E-BP1) and p70 S6 kinase and the upstream modulator of mTOR, Akt, were expressed in margins overexpressing eIF4E. RESULTS: There was a significant association between phospho-4E-BP1 and eIF4E expression of a margin or a significant difference in phospho-4E-BP1 expression between the eIF4E-positive and -negative margins (P < 0.01). A significant association between eIF4E and phospho-p70 S6 kinase as well as eIF4E and phospho-mTOR was also noted (P < 0.05). Western blot analysis indicated a highly significant difference in the phosphorylation status of 4E-BP1 between tumors and resection margins. A total of 89% of the 4E-BP1-expressing margins expressed more of the phosphorylated (beta, gamma, and delta) isoforms, whereas 81% of the 4E-BP1-expressing tumors expressed more of the unphosphorylated alpha isoform. A similar difference in Akt activation was noted between eIF4E-positive margins and tumors (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Overexpression of eIF4E is functionally active in tumor margins through activation of the Akt/mTOR signaling pathway. The greater degree of expression of downstream targets and upstream regulators of mTOR in margins compared with the tumors indicates preferential activation of the Akt/mTOR signaling pathway in margins overexpressing eIF4E. Rapamycin analogs can potentially be used as adjuvant therapy for patients with eIF4E-positive margins.     

Randomized, placebo-controlled study of oregovomab for consolidation of clinical remission in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

PURPOSE: To assess oregovomab as consolidation treatment of advanced ovarian cancer and refine the immunotherapeutic strategy for subsequent study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with stage III/IV ovarian cancer who had a complete clinical response to primary treatment were randomly assigned to oregovomab or placebo administered at weeks 0, 4, and 8, and every 12 weeks up to 2 years or until recurrence. The primary end-point was time to relapse (TTR). RESULTS: One hundred forty-five patients were treated with oregovomab (n = 73) or placebo (n = 72). For the population overall, median TTR was not different between treatments at 13.3 months for oregovomab and 10.3 months for placebo (P =.71). Immune responses were induced in most actively treated patients. This was associated with prolonged TTR. Quality of life was not adversely impacted by treatment. Adverse events were reported with similar frequency in oregovomab and placebo groups, indicating a benign safety profile. A long-term survival follow-up is ongoing. Cox analysis of relapse data identified significant factors: performance status, CA-125 before third cycle, and baseline CA-125. Further evaluation identified a subpopulation with favorable prognostic indicators designated as the successful front-line therapy (SFLT) population. For the SFLT population, TTR was 24.0 months in the oregovomab group compared with 10.8 months for placebo (unadjusted hazard ratio of 0.543 [95% CI, 0.287 to 1.025]), a hypothesis-generating observation. CONCLUSION: Consolidation therapy with oregovomab did not significantly improve TTR overall. A set of confirmatory phase III studies has been initiated to determine whether the SFLT population derives benefit from oregovomab treatment.     

Soft tissue sarcomas of adults: state of the translational science.

Sarcomas--like leukemias, which are also mesodermal malignancies--carry biological significance disproportionate to their clinical frequency. Identification of mutations and translocations associated with these tumors has illuminated aberrant signaling pathways that cause these diseases, determine their behavior, and are therapeutic targets. Activated receptor-associated tyrosine kinase c-kit, mutated in most gastrointestinal stromal tumors, has proven a clinically effective target for enzyme inhibition. A translocation involving a single gene family, consisting of EWS and related genes, has been identified in five different sarcomas, and its chimeric protein products could prove similarly amenable to inhibitors. Resolution of the histopathological complexity is being aided by data from molecular and chromosomal characterization. Improvements in imaging, definition of prognostic factors, and surgical and radiotherapeutic treatment have resulted in improved local control. Continued progress will depend on further adapting the rapidly evolving technologies of genomics and proteomics. It will also depend upon accurate histopathological diagnosis based on validated reagents and consistent methodologies applied to adequate tissue samples derived from patients with complete clinical data. Finally, multicenter, coordinated trials, such as those that occurred with assessment of imatinib mesylate in metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors, will assure the most rapid reductions in morbidity and mortality.     

Massive osteolysis of the skull base

Gorham's vanishing bone disease is a rare disorder characterized by massive osteolysis. Its etiology is unknown. We report the case of a 14-year-old girl with an unusually aggressive course and extensive involvement originating within the skull base. To our knowledge this pattern has not been described previously. MR findings are discussed. Received: 10 January 1996 Accepted: 3 July 1996     

A double-blind randomised controlled trial of the effects of medroxyprogesterone acetate on bone density of women taking oestrogen replacement therapy

Objective To assess the effects of medroxyprogesterone acetate on bone density in women who have had a hysterectomy
Design Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of medroxyprogesterone acetate 10 mg, 20 mg or placebo as an adjunct to oestrogen therapy.
Participants One hundred and twenty-three women, aged 18 to 45 years and currently receiving daily oestrogen, who presented at a university-based rheumatology practice.
Interventions The women were randomly assigned to receive either medroxyprogesterone acetate 10 mg, 20 mg or placebo daily beginning on day 15 of each month for one year. Forty-one women were randomised into each group.
Main outcome measure The primary outcome measurement was the percentage of change from baseline in bone mineral density of the lumbar spine (L2–L4). Secondary outcome measures included differences in femoral neck bone density, cholesterol and triglyceride levels between groups.
Results At one year, change in bone mineral density did not differ between either the treatment or placebo groups. Medroxyprogesterone acetate 20 mg and 10 mg led to statistically significant reductions in very low density lipoprotein cholesterol, total triglycerides, and very low density lipoprotein triglycerides when compared with placebo. Medroxyprogesterone acetate 20 mg also led to a statistically significant reduction in high density lipoprotein cholesterol, high density lipo-protein-2 cholesterol, and high density lipoprotein-2 triglycerides.
Conclusions Medroxyprogesterone acetate at either dose as an adjunct to oestrogen did not improve bone mineral density at one year when compared with placebo. Medroxyprogesterone acetate 10 mg may not adversely affect lipids. Medroxyprogesterone acetate 20 mg, however, did reduce high density lipoprotein cholestrol and therefore may increase cardiovascular risk.