Is tibial cut navigation alone sufficient in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? Continuous series of fifty nine procedures

Purpose

Our purpose was to assess medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with navigation alone for the tibial cut and limb alignment. We hypothesised that this technique could be used routinely in practice.

Methods

Outcome measures were tibial cut orientation and residual varus. Six-month post-operative radiographs of 59 knees were assessed.

Results

Tibial cut orientation was within 2° of planned in 70.2 and 76.3 % of knees in the coronal and sagittal planes, respectively (49.1 % in both), within 4° in 91.2 and 91.5 %, respectively (82.5 % in both). All coronal-plane errors were in varus. Excessive planed tibial slope was at risk of excessive varus of the tibial cut. The hip-knee-ankle angle was ≤179° in 81.4 % and the mechanical axis through Kennedy Zone 2 in 59.3 % of knees. Risk factors for inadequate varus were pre-operative hip-knee-ankle angle >176° and strictly articular varus.

Conclusions

Our results are not as good as previously reported with this technique, but taking into account the factors of failure identified, we could enhance the results.

     

Evaluation of stair motion contributes to new insights into hip osteoarthritis‐related motion pathomechanics

Stair motion in the presence of hip osteoarthritis (OA) has received less attention than level walking. Its more strenuous aspect may shed the light on different locomotor strategies when compared to walking. We, therefore, aimed to define stair motion features associated to hip OA and to evaluate whether these specific features would differ from level walking and better characterize the hip pathological condition. Principal component and linear discriminant analyses were, respectively, used as data reduction and classification techniques. Our study highlighted that most of stair motion features associated to hip OA were similar to the ones of walking. Stair descent presented with the lowest misclassification error rate, ranging from 12% to 19% (estimated by cross‐validation). But, features that may be considered as a mechanism to reduce demand on the hip abductors were found to be more important in the stair ascent condition. This was reflected by both, greater importance in the classification rule and variance compared with walking, that is, decreased hip internal rotation moment at mid‐stance (72.50% vs. 57.63%) and increased trunk lateroflexion toward affected side (56.43% vs. 29.37%). This study emphasized the importance of investigating stair motion in hip osteoarthritic population by highlighting specific locomotor strategies. © 2015 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 34:187–196, 2016.     

Incidence and Characteristics of Atypical Femoral Fractures: Clinical and Geometrical Data

Despite the multitude of studies published on atypical femoral fractures (AFFs), a profile for patients at risk does not exist. This study aimed first at estimating AFF incidence over a 19‐month‐period in Quebec City using the ASBMR Task force criteria to define AFF. The medical records of patients hospitalized for hip or femoral fracture between June 1, 2009, and December 31, 2010, were reviewed. Thirty‐six cases of atypical fractures were identified during the 19‐month period, representing an AFF incidence of 7.0 (range, 4.7 to 9.3) cases per 100,000 person‐years. In the second part of the study, data regarding the characteristics suspected of increasing the risks of AFF were collected from medical and pharmacological records, proximal femur radiographs, and patient interviews. The data regarding each patient with an AFF during years 2008‐2011 were compared to two controls with a hip or femoral fragility fracture or a traumatic fracture, paired for age and sex. Twenty patients with AFF were added to the 36 patients with AFF selected in the first part, thereby 56 patients with AFF were investigated. The association between the occurrence of AFF and bisphosphonates (BPs) use was proven statistically significant in multivariate analysis, odds ratio (OR) = 10.39 (95% CI, 2.22 to 48.58; p = 0.0029). Compared to controls, patients with AFF had excessive femoral offset (43.1 mm versus 38.3 mm, p = 0.0007), proximal femoral neck angle in varus (128.9 degrees versus 134.0 degrees, p < 0.0001), and had greater proximal cortical thickness. This retrospective study confirms the low incidence of AFF, confirms its significant association with exposure to BPs, and reveals the possible contribution of proximal femoral geometry in AFF occurrence. © 2016 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.