Decisions near the end of life.

Designing behavior change programs and evaluating their effects on patient care has been a persistent challenge in research on continuing medical education. The challenge becomes even more complex when we aim to change behaviors that are interactive and highly influenced by the formal and informal institutional context. The authors describe an interdisciplinary continuing education program in bioethics that is designed to effect just such behaviors. The program aims to help hospital and long-term care facilities improve their ability to resolve the ethical dilemmas inherent in terminal care decisions. Targeted to interdisciplinary groups of physicians, nurses, social workers, pastoral counselors, and administrators, Decisions Near the End of Life will provide strategies and tools for examining institutional policies and team practices as well as more traditional information, education, and skill building. The authors describe the program's rationale and design, and raise questions about the potential for developing interdisciplinary, action-oriented CME on other topics.     

EXTERNAL CEPHALIC VERSION

External cephalic version has been used periodically for centuries to manage breech presentations. As cesarean section rates have escalated in the last two decades, ways to curb this rise have been evaluated. By reducing the number of infants that arrive in labor in a representation, it is possible to impact the overall cesarean section rate. External cephalic version is a safe, effective method when used in appropriate cases of breech presentation. A forward or backward roll can be accomplished in women at term with singleton gestations, adequate amniotic fluid, and reactive nonstress tests. Parity, fetal and placental position, and descent of the presenting part may all influence the success rate of the version.     

Shoot First,Draw Later Peroneal Nerve Palsy: A Sonographic Study

A 32–year–old man had an unusual gunshot wound to the leg, causing a peroneal nerve palsy. Sonography provided useful complementary findings to the electrodiagnostic localization of the injury.     

Insertion of Hickman central venous catheters by using angiographic techniques in patients with hematologic disorders.

During a 9-month period, 69 Hickman catheters were successfully inserted by using angiographic techniques in 59 patients with hematologic disorders. A pneumothorax, which did not require drainage, developed in one patient. No other significant complications occurred at the time of insertion. Eighteen catheters were removed electively, 15 are still in situ, six were removed for thrombosis, and five were accidentally removed. Infection precipitated removal in six subjects. Ten patients died with the catheter in place. Five catheters were removed in patients with refractory septicemia of unknown origin. One catheter burst during an injection and had to be removed. Three patients were lost to follow-up. There were 3.24 infectious episodes per 1000 days of catheterization, more than twice the rate found in some other series. The results of this study are compatible with the growing body of evidence in favor of the angiographic insertion of Hickman catheters. The apparently high rate of infection is ascribed to factors other than insertion in the angiography suite, including the high proportion of bone marrow transplantation patients.     

Pretransplant Exposure to Donor HLA-DR Antigen in Random Transfusion Units and the Development of Donor Antigen-Specific Hyporeactivity

Our previous studies have shown that the in vitro assay of donor antigen-specific hyporeactivity is a useful marker for identifying solid organ transplant recipients (kidney, lung and heart) at low risk for immunologic complications (i.e., late acute rejection episodes and chronic rejection). Donor antigen-specific hyporeactivity is defined as a significantly decreased post- vs. pretransplant proliferative response to donor antigens while response to third-party controls remains unchanged. We analyzed whether exposure to the same HLA-DR antigen pretransplant via random blood transfusion and posttransplant via the transplanted organ influenced the development of hyporeactivity. Thirty previously nontransfused recipients, each receiving two 150 ml pretransplant random blood transfusions, were assessed for hyporeactivity at 1 year posttransplant. Of the 12 recipients with pretransplant exposure to kidney HLA-DR via transfusions, 6 (50%) developed hyporesponsiveness; in contrast, of the 18 recipients who were not preexposed, only 3 (15%) exhibited this form of immunomodulation. Of interest, 2 of the 3 hyporesponsive recipients who were not preexposed, received units containing HLA-DR antigens previously shown to share crossreactive epitopes with the kidney HLA-DR. In conclusion, these results suggest a increased incidence in the development of hyporeactivity in patients receiving pretransplant transfusions which share an HLA-DR antigen with the transplanted kidney.     

Addiction.: By David Marteau. Quay Books Division, Mark Allen Publishing, Ltd, London. 2001, 168pp., {pound}14.99. ISBN: 1-85642-189-9.

Addiction was written by David Marteau, a nurse and former headof treatment at Clouds House. It is a short book offering comprehensivecoverage of the causes, nature and treatment of     

Retention of "safe" blood donors. The Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study

BACKGROUND: There are obvious advantages to increasing donor retention. However, for reasons of blood safety, certain donors may, in fact, be more desirable to retain than others. “Safe” donors are defined as those who provided a blood donation that was negative on all laboratory screening tests and who subsequently reported no behavioral risks in response to an anonymous survey. This study identifies the most important factors affecting the intention of “safe” donors to provide another donation. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: An anonymous survey asking about donation history, sexual history, injecting drug use, and recent donation experience was mailed to 50,162 randomly selected allogeneic donors (including directed donors) who gave blood from April through July or from October through December 1993 at one of the five United States blood centers participating in the Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study. Before mailing, questionnaires were coded to designate donors with nonreactive laboratory screening tests at their most recent donation. RESULTS: A total of 34,726 donors (69%) responded, with substantially higher response among repeat donors. According to reported intentions only, the vast majority of “safe” donors indicated a high likelihood of donating again within the next 12 months. Only 3.4 percent reported a low likelihood of donating again. A comparison of those likely to return and those unlikely to return reveals significant differences in demographics and in ratings of the donation experience. A higher proportion of those unlikely to return were first-time donors, minority-group donors, and donors with less education. The highest projected loss among “safe” donors was seen for those who gave a fair to poor assessment of their treatment by blood center staff or of their physical well-being during or after donating. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that efforts to improve donors' perceptions of their donation experience, as well as attention to the physical effects of blood donation, may aid in the retention of both repeat and first-time donors.